Oh well, they are entitled to their opinion, and have the right to express it.

But that does not change the fact that a great many of us think they are full of sh*t !

I seriously doubt their celebrity status is going to impact the election.

Mainstream globalist D&R party Sunni Wahhabi Zionists.

Judge Jeannie don't like the neocons.

Hoo gives a fxxx?

Bernie may well not have the majority of votes to win the convention on the first ballot. It goes to the second ballot, and Bloomberg will have bought all of the superdelegates, and half the other people in the room. He wins the nomination.

Against Trump, Bloomberg will be the most effective, because it will be New York billionaire versus New York billionaire, flingin' poo at each other. Very entertaining, and Bloomberg is the more successful businessman, and ran New York City for 8 years. He's a formidable candidate.

If Bernie doesn't win it outright, Bloomberg could very well win it.

Of course if he beaver-dicks himself again tonight in the debate it may be over for him...except that if it goes to the second ballot, he could win by purchase.

That said, I agree that a Trump 48-state buttwhuppin of the MarxistMoron would be both enjoyable and educational for those miseducated snowflakes ignorant enough to support Bernie...MUD

Steyer, Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar all stood up there and supported ending the filibuster.

Biden, wisely, said No way.

Bloomberg said You work with the other side to get things passed.

Biden and Bloomberg are the only two who have the adult sense to be President.

Sure, abolishing the filibuster is a great idea - IF you live in a one party state and can never lose elections.

But we don't, and sure as sunshine, your party is going to be out of power someday. The filibuster is not a complete veto, but it DOES mean that there has to be some measure of bipartisanship and negotiation to pass ANYTHING.

It's true, if there were no filibuster, Trump would have easily abolished Obamacare, built his Wall, deported more illegals, cut taxes further, etc.

But if there were no filibuster, we would have nationalized health care, eliminated gun rights, and had government-funded abortion on demand 30 years ago. The courts would have been packed by Leftist hard-liners under Obama, just as they are being packed by Trump BECAUSE Harry Reid abolished the filibuster for judicial appointments.

Biden has been through winning and losing, and understands that you DON'T give away your veto.

Bloomberg, who's a Republican running as a Democrat, and who got things through the divided New York legislature, just says very pragmatically that you make a deal. OF COURSE you do.

These other Democrats think that you just grab all the power, negotiate with nobody, and jam everything down their throat without negotiation. And the one thing that none of them who think that has ever done is hold high executive power.

Biden and Bloomberg get it. They've already calculated into their minds, through experience, that the other side - the Republicans in Biden's case, the Democrats in Bloomberg's - always gets a seat at the table, and you always have to make deals with them.

That's just realism. Which is what makes Biden and Bloomberg, however annoying they may be, the only two up there who are realistic adults. They're the only ones who have even taken into account the fact that sometimes you lose, and when you're on the weak side, having a partial veto is really important, whatever side you're on.

"Biden and Bloomberg are the only two who have the adult sense to be President."

All Dem RATS are fighting for a greater percentage of their base. But these millennial BernieBackers' minds have been warped by 12-16+ years of relentless miseducation, thanks to the anti-American RATS who infest our education system.

No wonder this sorry group of RATcandidates moved to the top of the dungheap...MUD

Sure, abolishing the filibuster is a great idea - IF you live in a one party state and can never lose elections.

Sounds good.

In my opinion the Democrats will eliminate it anyway. Might as well beat them to the punch.

You can't make deals on everything. Often you have to stick to principle and just outright defeat your opponents by convincing a majority that you are right.

Today we have many evil people in America so that gets hard.

Faggots pretending to be married is evil.

Taking peoples guns away so they can't defend themselves is evil.

Antifa is evil.

Trump had the House and the Senate for two years. And Obama held that for two years. W Bush had that, barely, for 4 years.

Before that, Eisenhower had it for two years. And then you get back to good ol' Herbert Hoover, who had it for four years. So, since 1929, the Republicans have held the White House and both houses of Congress for a total of12 years.

The Democrats have held all three simultaneously for 34 years. Nearly three times as long as the Republicans. And the Democrats had powerful leaders like FDR, Truman, JFK and LBJ during that time, also politically popular leaders like Clinton and Obama. The one thing that stopped the Democrats during those three decades of power was the Republican filibuster, the need to negotiate with the other party to pass legislation.

Strip that away and look what happened during those few years of FDR and LBJ when the Democrats had such a majority in the Senate that the Republicans could not filibuster during FDRs and LBJs rule. Look what came out of that: the New Deal and the Great Society.

Strip away the filibuster and what will you get from the Republicans if they control both parties? A Border Wall? Nah. It wasn't the Democrats who stopped that, it was Paul Ryan. Tax cuts? What would you get out of Democrats? Socialised Medicine, Hard Gun Control, free college in public institutions, open borders.

The filibuster was THE means by which the Republicans held back the tide for decades. Giving up that veto would be disastrous for them.

Even if every thing you said is true. It doesn't matter because the democrats are evil and will abolish it regardless.

That may be so. Obama didn't during the time that the Democrats controlled the Senate under him. Biden won't. Bernie will - that's true.

Biden won't

Do you really trust evil liars?

Do you really trust evil liars?

When their own self-interest is at stake, I trust them to seek to protect it. Biden is old enough and experienced enough in the Senate to realize that the filibuster has been valuable at saving the Democrats from disaster, and that if the Senate denies, Executive Orders supply the power needed to do just about anything.

Your opinion is reasonable in my opinion. I just think that the democrats will definitely do it when given the chance. Should the house have a fillibuster too? Thed demoncrats are desperate especially when Ginsburg is replaced by Trump. And that other old freak Breyer too. He's 81.

"I just think that the democrats will definitely do it when given the chance."

I would NOT bet against you...still, I would prefer if the Pubbies try to maintain the high road on this as long as possible. If the RATS open the door, then the GOP will walk right thru it. But let the RATS open the door first, imho...MUD

I bet Biden voted for removing filibusters on Judicial nominees.

I think Biden was VP at the time, so didn't get a vote.