A K A Stone on Thin Ice

Source: 4um
Published: Jan 25, 2010
Author: Various
Post Date: 2010-01-26 00:00:16 by Fred Mertz
Views: 51841

That site doesn't ban anyone, or so they say.

.. I'm biting my fingertips to keep from typing words expressing my annoyance with you.

christine posted on 2010-01-25 23:47:26 ET

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: mininggold    To: Fred Mertz (#0)

That site doesn't ban anyone, or so they say.

The video on the main page says there is freedom of speech and association there. I guess Stone doesn't want to associate with Chuck Baldwin although I would have been a little less blunt about it.

mininggold posted on 2010-01-26 01:55:38   Reply   Private Reply

#2: war    To: Fred Mertz (#0)

4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site. This editorial policy certainly appears to protect the posters there who don't want to be called out for their irrational hatred of Jews. If you point this out, as I have, you get warned or banned. It wouldn't surprise me if posters there believe that I was some sort of Zionista plant sent to disrupt simply because I questioned why a poster used the term "Hebe"...

One of the more bizzarre conversations I had there was over an Irish-American NPR reporter...the person I was speaking with said his name sounded Jewish...

war posted on 2010-01-26 07:47:50   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Biff Tannen    To: A K A Stone (#0)

Good work AKA, you're completely right. Baldwin's a complete nut.

Biff Tannen posted on 2010-01-26 08:26:25   Reply   Private Reply

#4: A K A Stone    To: Biff Tannen (#3)

I have read some of his other articles and i find them dead on. But not this one.

A K A Stone posted on 2010-01-26 08:47:18   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Badeye    To: war (#2)

No, they just knew you were a fraud, a hypocrite, and quite insane...

Badeye posted on 2010-01-26 09:12:23   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Badeye    To: Fred Mertz (#0)

oooooh, skanks upset again....

Badeye posted on 2010-01-26 09:13:06   Reply   Private Reply

#7: war    To: Badeye (#5)

Why don't you register there, basslips...?

war posted on 2010-01-26 09:24:34   Reply   Private Reply

#8: Badeye    To: war (#7)

I am, idiot.

Badeye posted on 2010-01-26 10:03:54   Reply   Private Reply

#9: war    To: Badeye (#8)

I am, idiot.

You don't need a comma there, sport...

war posted on 2010-01-26 10:08:49   Reply   Private Reply

#10: mininggold    To: war (#2)

4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site.

I was surprised at all the hubb bubb created when Destro brought up the fact the site might be banned or filtered from libraries due to some of the nasty language used by a few of the inner circle. Like this would be news?

Free association on an internet chat site is just another word for social club when not everyone is allowed the same freedom.

mininggold posted on 2010-01-26 13:55:03   Reply   Private Reply

#11: war    To: mininggold (#10)

Websense blocks it here...I went to bat for it but it ran afoul again...since I was banned no reason to go to bat for it...

war posted on 2010-01-26 15:49:35   Reply   Private Reply

#12: war    To: mininggold (#10)

Free association on an internet chat site is just another word for social club when not everyone is allowed the same freedom.

Yep

war posted on 2010-01-26 15:49:51   Reply   Private Reply

#13: buckeroo    To: Fred Mertz, AKA Stone (#0)

How does a simple brick layer have the POWER to create an Internet chit-channel that has any capabilities to alter the future?

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 20:05:39   Reply   Private Reply

#14: Fred Mertz    To: buckeroo (#13)

Is this a riddle? Hiya Bucky!

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-01-31 20:24:59   Reply   Private Reply

#15: buckeroo    To: Fred Mertz (#14)

Is this a riddle?

It is a philosophical enigma.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 20:41:18   Reply   Private Reply

#16: A K A Stone    To: buckeroo (#13)

How does a simple brick layer have the POWER to create an Internet chit-channel that has any capabilities to alter the future?

Brickwork, historic restoration, carpentry, drywall, painting, masonry work, ceramic tile, wood floors and pretty much anything else anyone would ever want done on their home. To bad you are so far away buckeroo or I would offer you a discount since you are such a nice chap.

A K A Stone posted on 2010-01-31 20:58:27   Reply   Private Reply

#17: buckeroo    To: A K A Stone (#16)

Don't fuck with me ever again. You are nothing more than a simple guy in Ohio looking for a job and while idle, attempting to make some prolific perspective because your wife and possible children slap you around because all you have is fried rice for dinner mixed upped with San Francisco treats called macaroni laden with goat fat.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 21:19:34   Reply   Private Reply

#18: A K A Stone    To: buckeroo (#17)

You are nothing more than a simple guy in Ohio

That's me bucky.

A K A Stone posted on 2010-01-31 21:22:22   Reply   Private Reply

#19: Fred Mertz    To: buckeroo (#17)

...fried rice for dinner mixed upped with San Francisco treats called macaroni laden with goat fat.

Stop it, bucky, you're making me hungry. Mmmmm, fried rice...

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-01-31 21:25:31   Reply   Private Reply

#20: buckeroo    To: A K A Stone (#18)

Who the fuck would publicky admit to living in Ohio on their own web chat site? What are you some fucking monster making Dayton going into revolution? I hear the sheriff is going to hold you accountable.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 21:33:53   Reply   Private Reply

#21: Mad Dog    To: faggot freddy, drunken bucky (#19)

Stop it, bucky, you're making me hungry.

LMAO!

Why faggot freddy, did he say dick or asshole?

Mad Dog posted on 2010-01-31 22:27:59   Reply   Private Reply

#22: buckeroo    To: Mad Dog (#21)

I don't talk like your silly channel over @liberty_post. I never have. But it is up you to prove your perspective.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 22:34:30   Reply   Private Reply

#23: _Jim    To: Fred Mertz (#0)

That site doesn't ban anyone, or so they say.

They (or you're) nutz.

Yes, they BAN.

Any claims to the contrary are completely fallacious.

That, or site management has a recall capability of that of a child (two, no more than three days).

.

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 22:39:49   Reply   Private Reply

#24: Fred Mertz    To: _Jim (#23)

Yes, they BAN.

I know they do. They keep a few outliers like Ferret Mike and A K A and buckeroo, but they are mostly a clique or an echo chamber.

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-01-31 22:43:51   Reply   Private Reply

#25: buckeroo    To: Fred Mertz, Palo_Verde (#24)

They keep a few outliers like Ferret Mike and A K A and buckeroo

I am groomed to take over the channel administration. With luck you will keep this significant secret between yourself and me. What-ever you do, keep this expose to yourself. I don't want others to go "off' into a tizzy.

My God, are you aware that some desert flowers could just walk away from their respective husbands in Arizona claiming the "GREAT AMERICAN RELIEF ACT" based upon individual rights and freedoms?

I won't mention any names but the initials, Palo-Verde comes to mind.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:18:36   Reply   Private Reply

#26: buckeroo    To: war (#2)

4um? They do ban people and if you read the mission statement or whatever on the front page, Christine, IMHO, states that free association will trump free speech on that site.

I am the first poster on 4um to be banned .... and on FU and on LibertyPost and on FR.

When I helped John Deere create LibertyForum, I was banned.

Who the fuck are you?

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:29:19   Reply   Private Reply

#27: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#26)

I am the first poster on 4um to be banned

I think I may trump you on this point ...

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 23:31:26   Reply   Private Reply

#28: buckeroo    To: _Jim, AKA Stone (#27)

There is no way ANYONE can trump my personal efforts to be banned on the Internet. Yet, here on Stone's Ohio chittie-chatty channel I am welcome. What is wrong with this guy? I shall kill his efforts and certainly his money to create a channel.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:35:15   Reply   Private Reply

#29: Mad Dog    To: drunken bucky (#22)

LOL!

Try writing it again sometime when you are sober bucky.

As it is now, it only makes sense to wet brains such as you wino.

I'll wait.

LOL!

Mad Dog posted on 2010-01-31 23:37:41   Reply   Private Reply

#30: Fred Mertz    To: buckeroo (#26)

I am the first poster on 4um to be banned ....

You can't be banned if you're still posting there.

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-01-31 23:38:06   Reply   Private Reply

#31: buckeroo    To: Mad Dog (#29)

LOL!

You dumb fucking Alaskan whiner begging Palin to come to you in your dreams. And what do you wake up with ... your pal, yukon?

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:42:33   Reply   Private Reply

#32: buckeroo    To: Fred Mertz (#30)

Not true.

I was number one banned; on every chitty-chat channel you ever saw me appear upon. Now, do you want to know why?

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:44:10   Reply   Private Reply

#33: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#28)

There is no way ANYONE can trump my personal efforts to be banned on the Internet.

Not challenging that point; when were you banned on 4um?

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 23:45:19   Reply   Private Reply

#34: Mad Dog    To: drunken bucky (#31)

LOL!

You really are much more pleasant to be around since you switched your "beverage" of choice from sterno to vanilla extract drunken bucky, your breath smells so much better now.

Mad Dog posted on 2010-01-31 23:46:41   Reply   Private Reply

#35: Mad Dog    To: drunken bucky (#31)

LOL!

Btw drunken bucky it's spelled Alaskan "winner".

I hope you aren't mixing that vanilla extract with any soda drunken bucky, soda is bad for you.

Mad Dog posted on 2010-01-31 23:50:42   Reply   Private Reply

#36: buckeroo    To: _Jim (#33)

Not challenging that point; when were you banned on 4um?

Check it out for yourself. It was not long after creation.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:52:27   Reply   Private Reply

#37: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#28)

My last post date late 2005 (10-29) ... before being banned ...

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=_Jim&To=&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 23:52:40   Reply   Private Reply

#38: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#36)

Check it out for yourself. It was not long after creation.

YOUR latest/last post date comes up more like ... 2010-01-31 (today)

freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=buckeroo&To=&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 23:55:07   Reply   Private Reply

#39: buckeroo    To: Mad Dog (#35)

Alaskan "winner".

Correction, you are a fucking Alaskan whiner. You would probably screw a melted glacier just after eating some newly understood wetland tundra that you think is all because of Obama.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:56:37   Reply   Private Reply

#40: buckeroo    To: _Jim (#38)

Go back in time, my good friend. Go way back.

buckeroo posted on 2010-01-31 23:57:38   Reply   Private Reply

#41: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#40)

I see a solid posting history on 4um from 2005-02-18 through today ... WUWT?

_Jim posted on 2010-01-31 23:59:59   Reply   Private Reply

#42: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#40)

#2. To: buckeroo (#1)

Welcome to 4..

Zipporah posted on 2005-02-18 13:57:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=667&Disp=2#C2

_Jim posted on 2010-02-01 00:02:08   Reply   Private Reply

#43: Fred Mertz    To: _Jim (#41)

Maybe he means FreedomUnderground...I'm just guessing...

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-02-01 00:03:47   Reply   Private Reply

#44: Fred Mertz    To: _Jim (#41)

Check that last reply...he's still posting at FU too.

Fred Mertz posted on 2010-02-01 00:05:40   Reply   Private Reply

#45: buckeroo    To: _Jim (#41)

Not true.

I am number one poster banned. I taunt while making everyone feel insecure about themselves. Just like here on AKA's channel. I am going to get the BIG_KICK.... he will watch his ratings plummett because I picked on him.

It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on you back on FR during 1999 while you believed the federal government was "GOOD" frying the Branch Davidians to death. And you supported Chuck Schumer in the Congressional hearings while he smiled burning innocent women and children.

buckeroo posted on 2010-02-01 00:08:21   Reply   Private Reply

#46: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#45)

It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on ...

Fortunately, the facts of the case were never in your favor.

Only hyperbole, dissembling, craw-dadding and in some case wholesale fabrication 'for your cause'.

Oh yeah, we know you well ...

_Jim posted on 2010-02-01 00:20:36   Reply   Private Reply

#47: _Jim    To: Fred Mertz (#44)

Check that last reply...he's still posting at FU too.

Either he's (his mind) has skipped a cog or - he's testing us to see if we can spot the inconsistency.

I think we spotted the inconsistency.

_Jim posted on 2010-02-01 00:23:31   Reply   Private Reply

#48: buckeroo    To: _Jim (#46)

the facts of the case were never in your favor.

Yeah. I am alive and kicking, similar to yourself. But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles.

Would you like me to send a lighter to you in recognition of YOUR awesome talent towards discerning the truth?

buckeroo posted on 2010-02-01 00:28:13   Reply   Private Reply

#49: _Jim    To: buckeroo (#48)

But your compliant government message swore your faith about America before any honour or pursuit of ethical or moral principles.

Negative; I had a specific message to get out, to wit, the truth, as opposed to the wholesale fabrication of the du jour patriot movement at the time ... You are entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled to your own 'facts'; get the diff?

_Jim posted on 2010-02-01 00:31:43   Reply   Private Reply

#50: goldeeluckx    To: buckeroo (#45)

It is fun, _Jim, to have debate. Just like I used to pick on you back on FR during 1999 while you believed the federal government was "GOOD" frying the Branch Davidians to death. And you supported Chuck Schumer in the Congressional hearings while he smiled burning innocent women and children.

Remember to that those kids were burned to death under the watch of Janet Reno. I saw that movie Rules of Engagement. Unbelievable! Those people were fried to death with cns gas by our own feds.

goldeeluckx posted on 2010-02-01 00:33:31   Reply   Private Reply