/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fimage%2F836565%2Ffdec8aa6-f493-4904-9982-4f30b4959d5a.jpg)
Trump was forced to unblock 41 Twitter accounts after a judge ruled the President was violating Twitter users' First Amendment rights by blocking them on the site.
If the President of the United States blocks you on Twitter, that means hes violating your First Amendment rights.
Donald Trump has been forced to unblock 41 Twitter users who had apparently irked the President on the social media platform. However, this isnt a choice Trump willingly made. A federal judge ruled that the tweets posted on the Presidents account are public forums and blocking a user violated their Constitutional right to free speech.
Back in May of this year, a judge ruled on Trumps Twitter blocking practices after the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed a lawsuit on behalf of 7 Twitter users who were blocked by the President. The suit argued that Trump blocked the plaintiffs after they criticized the president, which constituted "viewpoint discrimination. Being that the Presidents Twitter, @RealDonaldTrump, is a public forum, that would be in violation of their First Amendment rights to free speech. U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan agreed with the plaintiffs.
The presidents practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end, Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institutes executive director, said in a statement at the time.
Those 7 users which included comedian Nick Pappas, surgeon and anti-Trump Twitter personality Dr. Eugene Gu, and DailyKOS editor and legal analyst Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza were unblocked by Trump in June. Yet, months later, many Twitter users who @ replied their opinions to Trump remained blocked by the President.
Earlier this month, the Knight First Amendment Institute sent a letter to the U.S. Justice Department requesting the President comply with judges ruling. Along with the letter was a list of 41 accounts that Trump still blocked. Yesterday, these users which includes TV producer and frequent Trump critic Danny Zuker, MoveOn activist Jordan Uhl, and journalists like Alex Kotch and Jules Suzdaltsev were unblocked by the Presidents Twitter account.
WE DID IT GUYS!
WE WON THE LAWSUIT!
WE'RE FINALLY UNBLOCKED BY @REALDONALDTRUMP! pic.twitter.com/yebQvNQhU2 Jules Suzdaltsev (@jules_su) August 28, 2018
Thanks to @knightcolumbia for getting me unblocked from Our Dumb President! So much moronic content awaits me. https://t.co/nN7ORXGxGS
Alex Kotch 🔥🚲 (@alexkotch) August 29, 2018
After the ruling in May, the Justice Department complained about the decision, claiming that Trump's @RealDonaldTrump Twitter account "belongs to Donald Trump in his personal capacity and is subject to his personal control, not the control of the government." While the judge disagreed, she did allow the President a bit of a workaround. While Trump would violate Twitter users rights with a block, the President could use the mute feature, which would still give them the ability to view and reply to his tweets, even though he cant see their posts.
Its important to note that the Presidents Twitter account seems to have only unblocked the accounts mentioned in the list sent to the DOJ. Many users are still blocked by Trump, as Rosie ODonnell pointed out.
still blocked ... #cowardTRUMP pic.twitter.com/lhwO9Rh2GR
ROSIE (@Rosie) August 29, 2018
Laura Packard is a stage 4 cancer survivor, health care activist, co-chair of Health Care Voter, and one of the 41 Twitter users the President just unblocked. Packard was blocked by Trump last year while criticizing the Republicans plan to repeal and replace Obamacare.
Your latest TrumpCare bill would mean 32M Americans will lose their health insurance. What about putting them first? https://t.co/wPObZisLQp
Laura Packard (@lpackard) September 19, 2017
Omg. The President of the United States just personally blocked me. pic.twitter.com/MgLfwufOXC
Laura Packard (@lpackard) September 20, 2017
I'm pleased that the President of the United States is following the law and doing what the courts told him to do, which is to respect our first amendment rights and unblock critics on Twitter, Packard said in a statement to Mashable. I would hope that our President had more important things to do than spend all day on Twitter, but since he does not, we should at least have the right to correct his fake news, demagoguery and racist dog-whistles as needed.
Poster Comment:
Reunited.

The lines of communication are open once again.
#1: Justified To: hondo68 (#0)
Why and how is this possible without a commie judge?
When you can not block people from abusing "your" twitter account its unAmerican. Commies will stop at nothing to hound Trump or any user they dislike until they stop posting and kill the account. This is like a judge claiming you can not block callers to your phone.
Justified posted on 2018-08-29 19:02:53 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hondo68 To: Justified (#1)
He did it to himself. There's a price to pay for being stupid, as The Donnell is learning. Or is he?
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-29 19:29:02 Reply Private Reply
#3: Justified To: hondo68 (#2)
There are 320 million people in America and over 7 billion in the world. It would be pure chaos to let just anyone post as they see fit.
There is 60 million opposition members who are bat shit crazy and would have no problem clogging up HIS Twitter account just because they are hateful people.
This judgement must have come from one of those batshit crazy people!
Justified posted on 2018-08-29 20:35:39 Reply Private Reply
#4: Hondo68 To: Justified, Dont Censor The Donald! (#3)
President Trump needs to be free to respond to Rosie O'Doughnut, without any censorship. He may be a NWO stooge, but he has free speech rights too.
Don't censor The Donald! Use the twitter "mute" feature if it's too painful for you to read President Trump's NYC progressive rants.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-29 20:56:40 Reply Private Reply
#5: Justified To: hondo68 (#4)
Since its his account he should be free to allow whoever he wishes or disallow those he dislikes.
Justified posted on 2018-08-29 21:04:52 Reply Private Reply
#6: jeremiad To: Justified (#5)
jeremiad posted on 2018-08-29 22:14:05 Reply Private Reply
#7: Justified To: jeremiad (#6)
Since they are considered more like a "utility company" that its open to all that can pay for it's services and not abuse it. I think the 64k question is what is abuse?
Justified posted on 2018-08-30 08:41:54 Reply Private Reply