Grassley Announces Senate Confirmation Hearings on Kavanaugh September 47
by Ken Klukowski
Breitbart
10 Aug 2018
Washington, DC
WASHINGTON, DC Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) announced on Friday that his Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on Judge Brett Kavanaughs nomination for the U.S. Supreme Court on September 4 through 7, giving the Senate time to confirm him before the Supreme Court begins its annual term on October 1.
Opening statements from Kavanaugh and the senators on the committee will take place September 4. The senators will then question the nominee on September 5. The final part of the hearings will include testimony from national leaders in the legal community.
Democrats are expressing outrage at the schedule, saying that they have not had enough time or material to vet President Trumps nominee, but those objections fall apart on the facts.
Grassley has presided over the most thorough vetting of any Supreme Court justice in U.S. history, and he says it is now time for his committee to prepare for public hearings.
Kavanaugh has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for 12 years. During that time he has authored 307 opinions, totaling 4,800 pages. He has also joined hundreds more, for a total of over 6,400 pages of additional judicial opinions. This comprehensive record of his legal philosophy has been in the public domain for years.
All that notwithstanding, Grassley has ensured that the Judiciary Committee took an extremely close look at Kavanaugh, and has reviewed hundreds of thousands of documents. While senators received 172,000 pages on Justice Elena Kagan and 184,000 pages on Justice Neil Gorsuch, lawmakers received an all-time record of over 900,000 pages of documents on Kavanaugh the largest number of Executive Branch records ever submitted to the Senate for a Supreme Court nominee in American history.
Beyond that, Kavanaugh returned the most comprehensive, bipartisan Senate questionnaire in the history of the Judiciary Committee, providing 110 pages of answers to the committees questions. These answers were accompanied by an astounding 17,000 pages of documentation and supporting materials.
[snip]
#1: Hondo68 To: nolu chan, WH DOJ cover up (#0)
900,000 pages is not enough to bury Kavanaugh's cover up of the Vince Foster murder.
Release the dirt and defeat confirmation.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-10 19:15:54 Reply Private Reply
#2: nolu chan To: hondo68 (#1)
hondo68 accused of disseminating despicable Democrat propaganda
Thi repulsive and disgusting propaganda is is half-assed garbage. The Trump administration is withholding nothing that has been properly requested by the Senate committee.
Here is where the propaganda bullshit becomes obvious to those familiar with the system. Why is the article citing the FOIA without explaining the bullshit nature of the article's propaganda?
The standard procedure is for the committee to request the documents from the National Records and Archives Administration (NARA), and it does not involve the FOIA. A request was made by the committee for 900,000 pages of documents, and NARA has already begun reviewing and supplying them.
Elections have consequences. As a result of the people electing a majority of Republicans to the Senate, all committee chairmen are Republicans, and all committees have Republican majorities.
NARA reviews and provides the requested documents on a priority basis to the Commmittee, as requested by the Committee. NARA estimates it will take until the end of October to finish reviewing and providing the 900,000 pages requested by the Committee.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/national-archives-may-not-finish-reviewing-kavanaugh-documents-before-end-of-october/
NARA does NOT provide similar review and release of documents on a priority basis to individual members of a committee. There is no provision for the individual members to bypass the committee and obtain the same services.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/03/national-archives-denies-schumer-request-for-kavanaugh-docs.html
NARA declined to process an irregular request from Cryin' Chuck Shumer which did not follow proper protocol and get processed through the Judiciary Committee.
The despicable Democrats are merely engaged in delaying tactics to push the nomination of the estimable Judge Kavanaugh past the midterm elections, in the desperate hope that they will then regain control of the Senate Judiciary committee and stop the nomination for unjustified partisan political reasons. In a disgusting move, these despicable Democrats have even called for the cessation of expediting the review process.
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/senate-democrats-stop-expediting-release-of-kavanaughs-white-house-records/
Of course, none of this had anything whatever to do with the FOIA.
Why did the half-assed propaganda article not explain where the FOIA came into all this? Because it jacks the propaganda bullshit all to hell.
Individual members of the Judiciary Committee can file FOIA requests as members of the public. Such individual requests from the public will not take precedent over the 900,000 page job that was dumped on NARA by the Judiciary Committee.
If the workload exceeds the ability of NARA to meet demand within the time set by the FOIA, you just get to wait. It happens to everybody, even Chuck Shumer and his Cryin' Choir. Take a number and get in line.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08/politics/senate-democrats-brett-kavanaugh-documents/index.html
nolu chan posted on 2018-08-10 23:22:03 Reply Private Reply
#3: Hondo68 To: nolu chan, slow FOIA disclosure, fast CONfirmation (#2)
The Donald's bipartisan Deep State drags it's feet on FOIA disclosure, as Grassley's hack commission kicks it up to Full Speed Ahead confirmation cover-up.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-11 00:21:46 Reply Private Reply
#4: nolu chan To: hondo68 (#3)
Faced with facts, hondo68 makes up propaganda and tries to bullshit his way through with an ignorant claim of Deep State foot dragging on FOIA disclosure.
As was document at my #3, several individuals, in their individual capacities as members of the public, filed Freedom of Information Act requests on August 8, 2018. (Blumenthal, Feinstein,Leahy, Durbin, Whitehouse, Klobuchar, Coons , Hirono, Booker, and Harris.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08/politics/senate-democrats-brett-kavanaugh-documents/index.html
The FOIA Requests of 8 August 2018, which is THREE (3) DAYS AGO. As a Saturday, today does not count as a day of handling by the receiving agency.
Please explain your ignorant and propagandist claim that there is FOIA foot dragging involved.
What is the earliest date that even a preliminary response could possibly be due for an FOIA request of 8 August 2018?
When all else fails, read the instructions.
See 36 CFR Ch. XII (7-1-11 Edition), § 1250.26(e):
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presidential Records, FOIA, NARA FOIA Regs
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Executive Order 13489 - Presidential Records, Barack Obama (21 Jan 2009)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
https://www.scribd.com/document/385962096/5-USC-552-Public-Information-Agency-Rules-Opinions-Orders-Records-And-Proceedings-aka-FOIA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
https://www.scribd.com/document/385962174/NARA-FOIA-REG-CFR-2011-Title-36-Vol-3-Part-1250-Sub-C-PUBLIC-AVAILABILITY-AND-USE
nolu chan posted on 2018-08-11 13:26:57 Reply Private Reply
#5: Hondo68 To: nolu chan, Vince Foster coverup, bushbot neocon progressive, Deep State swamp (#4)
When Donald Trump started running for the Republican nomination for president in June 2015, he began by attacking the Republican establishment in Washington, and he began his attack by calling the establishment "the swamp."
His real target was the permanent government and its enablers in the legal, financial, diplomatic and intelligence communities in Washington. These entities hover around power centers no matter which party is in power.
Beneath the swamp, Trump argued, lies the deep state. This is a loose collection of career government officials who operate outside ordinary legal and constitutional frameworks and use the levers of government power to favor their own, affect public policy and stay in power. Though I did not vote for Trump -- I voted for the Libertarian candidate -- a part of me rejoiced at his election because I accepted his often repeated words that he would be a stumbling block to the deep state and he'd drain the swamp.
On Monday night, he rewarded the swamp denizens and deep state outliers by nominating one of their own to the Supreme Court.
Here is the back story.
The late Justice Antonin Scalia -- my friend during the final 10 years of his life -- and his neighbor and colleague Justice Anthony Kennedy often remarked to each other during the Obama years that each would like to leave the Supreme Court upon the election of a Republican president. Scalia's untimely death in February 2016 denied him that choice, but Kennedy bided his time.
When Trump was elected president, Kennedy told friends that he needed to await Trump's nominee to replace Scalia to gauge whether the judicially untested Trump could be counted upon to choose a nominee of Kennedy's liking and Scalia's standing.
Trump knew Kennedy's thinking, and that guided him in choosing Neil Gorsuch for Scalia's seat. Gorsuch believes in the primacy of the individual and natural rights and is generally skeptical of government regulators. He is also a former Kennedy clerk.
So the Gorsuch selection was intended to serve two purposes. The first was to pick a Scalia-like thinker for the court as candidate Trump had promised, and the second was to give Kennedy a comfort level so he could retire and give President Trump a second nominee. It worked.
When Kennedy paid an unprecedented visit to the Oval Office two weeks ago, ostensibly to tell the president of his intention to retire, he also had a secret purpose -- to recommend his replacement. The announcement of Kennedy's departure began a firestorm of lobbying in behalf of four people from a list of 25 potential nominees that Trump had published when searching for Scalia's replacement.
The idea of a published list is novel. But it cemented loyalty from conservatives to Trump, who, of course, had no track record in evaluating or appointing judicial nominees. The standards used to put names on the list involved examining academic credentials and published works and, with the exception of one person, requiring judicial experience with a traditionalist bent, even if brief.
Social and religious conservatives pushed the president to nominate Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a fiercely Catholic mother of seven and former Notre Dame Law School professor who is a known opponent of abortion. Intellectual conservatives pushed for Judge Raymond Kethledge, a philosopher like Justice Gorsuch who believes in the primacy of the individual and who recognizes natural rights. The president's sister Judge Maryanne Trump Barry had her brother convinced that her colleague Judge Thomas Hardiman, a blue-collar diamond-in-the-rough conservative, would fulfill his promise to his base.
But at the last minute, a gaggle of Washington lawyers and lobbyists -- called the establishment when you agree with them and the swamp when you don't -- persuaded the president to reject his commitment to his sister and nominate Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is the man Justice Kennedy had asked the president to nominate and is another former Kennedy clerk.
The suspense over all this was palpable earlier this week. The showman in the president beat a drum so effectively last weekend that we all watched with excited pulse rates on Monday night. I was and remain extremely disappointed. Donald Trump -- whatever you think of him as a president -- has been utterly faithful to his campaign promises in foreign and domestic policy. Until now.
Now he has given us a nominee to the highest court in the land who typifies the culture he railed against when he claimed he'd drain the swamp. This man and this culture accept cutting holes in the Fourth Amendment because they don't believe that it should protect privacy. This man and this culture accept unlimited spying on innocent Americans by the National Security Agency because they don't believe that the NSA is subject to the Constitution.
This man and this culture even looked the other way in the face of deep state shenanigans against President Trump himself. This man and this culture accept the federal regulation of health care and its command that everyone buy health insurance, called Obamacare. This man and this culture embrace the Nixonian mantra that if the president does it, it is not illegal.
What happened here?
The Kavanaugh nomination is not a question of his qualifications; it is a question of his values. It is dangerous for judges to embrace values that diminish personal freedom rather than expand it. When they do that, they reveal their view that freedom comes from the government, not from within us. Thomas Jefferson and all the Founding Fathers profoundly rejected the government-as-source-of-freedom argument, but Judge Kavanaugh accepts it.
Jefferson once remarked that unless you pick someone's pocket or break someone's leg, no one should care how you exercise your freedom or pursue happiness. I wish the president had nominated a person who believes that, as well. But he didn't.
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-11 14:12:54 Reply Private Reply
#6: nolu chan To: hondo68 (#5)
nolu chan posted on 2018-08-13 19:01:20 Reply Private Reply
#7: Hondo68 To: nolu chan, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#6)
President Warren
Hondo68 posted on 2018-08-13 20:13:26 Reply Private Reply
#8: nolu chan To: hondo68 (#7)
Is that your replacement for those years of practicing to say President Hillary Clinton?
Come back to reality. Fauxcahontas ain't ever gonna win.
nolu chan posted on 2018-08-13 21:51:23 Reply Private Reply