President Trump tweeted Monday morning that he has the right to pardon himself, but that he has no reason to do so, because hes completely innocent.
His bold, frightening assertion comes after a weekend in which the Trump administrations legal argument that the president can basically do whatever he wants with no repercussions came into sharper focus.
On Saturday, the New York Times reported that Trump lawyers had sent Special Counsel Robert Mueller a letter in January arguing that their client should not be forced to sit for questioning because, as the president, he could not by definition have obstructed justice.
Then, on Sunday, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said on This Week that the Constitution probably gives Trump the power to pardon himself, but that if the president were to pull the trigger, it would lead to immediate impeachment.
Later, Giuliani told HuffPost that even if Trump had shot former FBI director James Comey, he couldnt be indicted while in office.
In reality, a presidential self-pardon is a constitutional gray area, the kind of weak spot in the document that Trump excels at exploiting.
In a Foreign Policy examination of the issue last year, Brian Kalt wrote that if the president tried the maneuver, he would have a very simple case that his self-pardon was valid: There is nothing in the Constitution that explicitly forbids it.
#1: Pinguinite To: Deckard (#0)
He could still be impeached. But speculating on what Trump thinks he can do vs what he actually does is a waste of time. Before he could pardon himself, he'd need to first know which crime he's accused of committing and that hasn't even been suggested yet.
I'd question any thing the NYT claims about what Trump or his lawyers said.
Pinguinite posted on 2018-06-04 11:12:23 Reply Private Reply
#2: Jameson To: Deckard (#0)
None of his "pardons" can protect himself or any of his toadies from
Mr. Mueller's close friend, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman
Jameson posted on 2018-06-04 11:17:26 Reply Private Reply
#3: misterwhite To: Deckard (#0)
Oh, Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court do a much, much better job exploiting that document.
If Trump does it he can be impeached. But if Congress or the U.S. Supreme Court does it? Yawn.
misterwhite posted on 2018-06-04 11:37:21 Reply Private Reply
#4: Vicomte13 To: Jameson (#2)
No. It'll take the CIA and NSA to do that.
Vicomte13 posted on 2018-06-04 11:39:58 Reply Private Reply
#5: nolu chan To: Jameson (#2)
Eric Schneiderman is not the New York Attorney General. Barbara Underwood is the NY AG.
Mueller's close friend was forced to resign within 24 hours of a sex scandal breaking.
nolu chan posted on 2018-06-04 12:39:50 Reply Private Reply
#6: tpaine To: Deckard, y'all (#0)
Trump made a supposedly "bold, frightening assertion",_---- and the progressives bit..
Gotta love this crap...
tpaine posted on 2018-06-04 19:24:41 Reply Private Reply
#7: Hank Rearden To: Deckard (#0)
Well played, Donald. More flopsweat.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-06-04 19:32:17 Reply Private Reply
#8: Jameson To: nolu chan (#5)
Correct. - Thanks - I don't follow too closely, as you can see.
My point remains valid.
Jameson posted on 2018-06-04 20:01:37 Reply Private Reply
#9: nolu chan To: Jameson (#8)
No, it does not. Any President has plenary authority to issue pardons, except in cases of impeachment. The threat a self-pardon would pose is impeachment. A state action goes nowhere while he is still in office.
nolu chan posted on 2018-06-04 20:14:22 Reply Private Reply
#10: Jameson To: nolu chan (#9)
SH45 cannot save Cohen or Mannafort or any of his other stooges from state charges.
Likewise, once he is out of office through resignation or removal, (or end of term) even a pardon of himself will not protect him from state charges.
I'm not an attorney, but the concept is fairly simple....
Jameson posted on 2018-06-04 22:07:21 Reply Private Reply
#11: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#8)
Yes we know like most liberal pieces of shit you don't follow things to closely. You are the token piece of shit of the forum.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-06-05 06:26:18 Reply Private Reply
#12: nolu chan To: Jameson (#10)
Correct. Two to six years from now, the state can bring charges, but for WHAT?
Cohen and Manafort have no immunity, and there are no state charges.
nolu chan posted on 2018-06-05 12:58:03 Reply Private Reply
#13: Jameson To: nolu chan (#12)
Be patient...Mr. Mueller is working on it.
and there are no state charges.
Yet...
Jameson posted on 2018-06-05 13:00:56 Reply Private Reply