|
Ever since President Trump said he was sending the military to the border to help stem the flow of illegal aliens coming in from Mexico, the media has been in a tizzy. Was it legal? Was it a good idea? Could they really do anything productive? And just what did he mean by the military anyway?
Now some of those questions have been answered and several hundred National Guard troops are on the job or at least on the way. But rather than asking the usual collection of talking heads on cable news or the reporters at the Washington Post, perhaps we should ask the people most directly impacted by the decision. Those would be the members of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) forces, more commonly referred to as the Border Patrol. Theyre ones who will still have to make all the arrests and coordinate with CBP. Government Executive has the response from some of their representatives and agents this week and it turns out that theyre actually quite happy to see the troops arriving.
Ill confess that part of the response from the Border Patrol has me rethinking the question of using National Guard troops along the border. (Assuming that we have the whole Posse Comitatus thing sorted out, of course.) I originally wondered what the point of having troops on the border was if they couldnt track down and detain illegal aliens coming in from Mexico. But while I knew the CBP had been asking for more resources, I didnt realize how understaffed they actually are. Their representative reports that the Patrol is currently 2,000 agents short of its congressionally defined minimum and theyre just not finding enough qualified applicants to fill their ranks. With that in mind, were being reminded that there are a lot of jobs to be done in order for CBP agents to actually nab incoming illegal aliens and the National Guard troops can fill those roles. They include watching surveillance cameras and sensors, keeping watch from roving mobile units or even performing routine administrative tasks back in the office. That frees up those agents to be out in the field making arrests. Sadly, if we want a true, long-term solution, the CBP needs to find a way to recruit, train and deploy more qualified candidates. Its not even a question of money because Congress has funded them above and beyond the level required for the number of agents they anticipated needing. If they want to attract more recruits for a frequently dangerous job in remote locations, new compensation packages and college training and recruitment programs should be considered. But in the meantime, the National Guard seems to be receiving a warm welcome at CBP. Lets see if theyve learned any lessons from when Bush and Obama sent them in and how effective they are this time. |
Poster Comment:
Another good thought piece. Shaw is one of HotGas's best writers.

#1: buckeroo To: Tooconservative (#0)
buckeroo posted on 2018-04-09 19:56:22 Reply Private Reply
#2: Tooconservative To: buckeroo (#1)
Short of a big spending and hiring spree to improve this situation, adding Guard members in support positions to free up trained Border Patrol agents to be in the field is the next best thing.
I included that photo of the trailer-mounted guard tower as a demonstration of how even some field jobs could be filled by relatively untrained Guard members. Also, I didn't even know we had those portable guard towers. They'd make a hell of a hunting stand for deer.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-10 08:06:54 Reply Private Reply