|
In the hey-day of social media start-ups, Facebook went from being a popular platform for keeping up with family and friends to a vital business resource. Media companies began to use the connections made by Facebook users to spread their content. Business pages grew exponentially. Some outlets like Independent Journal Review became media outlets precisely and exclusively because of their Facebook reach. During Obamas two terms, Facebook was a vital resource to his campaigns. They innovated data-gathering strategies and used Facebook as an indispensable messaging platform. All of Obamas opponents were left scrambling to catch up, history was made. Then along came 2016. Along came Trump. Suddenly those hailing the Obama teams tech savvy were utterly confounded and enraged that the same strategies boosted this strange, reality-star underdog to the presidency. Facebook -once the darling of social media began having to answer questions about how their algorithms helped spread fake news, or at least news that wasnt benefiting a certain ideology and political bent. It was a mess. Zuckerberg and his team immediately began promising to crack down on fake news and clickbait and offensive content. Algorithms shifted, censors were hired unsurprisingly conservative outlets were punished the most harshly. Media outlets like our own and IJR and others began to hire people whos only job it was to work with Facebook and its constantly changing algorithms. Over the last year it has become sickeningly clear that Facebook has no real intentions of working with media outlets who pay handsomely to comply with their ever-changing rules. If youve noticed some of your favorite pages for news and culture cant be seen anymore, thats because Facebook is deliberately squashing them. In March, the incredibly successful news and culture blog Rare -which is owned by media behemoth Cox Media announced that they would be closing up shop after nearly five years as a major outlet. This week, a Rare writer who had been with them from the beginning posted a saddening and blistering op-ed about Facebooks shady algorithm game, and how it is now killing careers and years of hard work and ultimately free expression. In Killed by Facebook, Matt Naham details the heady beginnings of the Rare start-up and how it expanded to multiple verticals which became hugely popular. Through hard work, good writing and a deliberate strategy to work within the Facebook boundaries Rare became one of the top sites for news and entertainment on the web. Naham says the plan was to seek out the shareable stories and make them most shareable on Facebook. But that didnt last long not long enough, anyway.
Rare scrambled to keep up with the constant changes. They, and others, paid Facebook huge sums of money for access and aid in navigating the algorithm jungle. Facebook had cleverly (and very capitalistically) found a way to monetize their influence. It only seemed fair for a private company, and media outlets were miffed but willing to play the game. This is how its done in America. Only, Facebook wouldnt stop moving the goalposts. They were happy to take the money all the while making it more and more difficult for content to be shared and even seen.
Naham says the team at Rare became increasingly frustrated, and it soon became clear that their grand and hugely successful endeavor would be coming to an end all because of an intentionally vicious algorithm.
Rare isnt the only casualty of Facebooks changes. Several start-up sites (including one I recently worked for) were forced to close just as they were taking off. The hugely popular Right Wing News has already had to close their doors. Rumors of serious issues at online media giants like IJR and The Blaze abound. It wont be long before more and more of your favorite news pages are simply gone for good in Facebook-land. It is clear they are making moves to become their own media outlet, thus having complete control over what users see and share. Have you noticed more FBTV videos popping up in your feed? Facebook wants to be what you share. Facebook wants the approval of what you share. Facebook wants any media outlet left on their platform to have to work through their own media in order to have any reach. In short, Facebooks big solution to tamping down fake news is to become the news. We should all be concerned about what that might mean in the upcoming election cycles. |
Poster Comment:
I've posted Rare articles here before, so have a few others. No more, thanks to Facebook.
This is a good inside story of what successful small media companies have to do to try to stay on Creepbook and have access to their monetization.
#1: Hank Rearden To: Tooconservative (#0)
FaceFvck is now the one beginning to wobble prior to collapse.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-01 13:05:22 Reply Private Reply
#2: Tooconservative To: Hank Rearden (#1)
They were huge on Facebook, trying to be the most inoffensive yet sharable stories. Facebook wanted that market for themselves so they made it harder and harder to find the Rare pages on Facebook and instead promoted their own stuff.
The most sinister angle here is that Rare was by no means a rightwing Facebook online news site. It went out of its way to be rigorously neutral and just report news. Facebook coveted their success and used The Algorithm to destroy them after they built up a staff of dozens of good writers and staff. All so Facebook could promote their own crap.
If this is what Creepbook does to a rigorously "neutral" news site, it isn't hard to imagine how all the conservative sites will just disappear from Facebook entirely, sooner than later. Unless Congress and/or the FCC do something about it.
Facebook wants to behave like a public utility, be shielded from legal consequences, and still get away with censoring anything and everything that people post there.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-01 13:26:22 Reply Private Reply
#3: Hank Rearden To: Tooconservative (#2)
No wonder I never heard of them.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-01 16:00:54 Reply Private Reply
#4: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#2)
Zuckenberg is a life-long leftie. Despite the popular propaganda myth the left promotes that they are about equality and sharing,and not money and control,they are about nothing BUT money and control.
The difference between the Nazis and the Communists in the 30's and 40's were primarily the uniforms,and the fact that the Communists murdered many,many more innocent people to seize and hold on to control.
sneakypete posted on 2018-04-01 19:46:22 Reply Private Reply