Big Questions:

Why would this previously un-released hotel video suddenly be released NOW of all times? And NOT by Las Vegas Police or the FBI to the public, but by the New York Times ("obtained exclusively" it is said "FROM MGM Resorts")?

And WHY is it It is narrated by what sounds like a Leprechaun, who assures us that the entire Stephen Paddock riddle will be explained and solved in six and a half minutes when we haven't heard such a resolution from the Vegas PD or FBI themselves??

Why is the New York Times the bearer of "good news", the "exclusive" recipient of this video AND the answer to the riddle?

NONE of this passes the smell-test.

One take from this baloney -- this is designed to give the New York Times credibility.

Another take: This (coupled with the "solved" case of the Austin Bomber) is timed to demonstrate LE competence.

Because they got ahold of the footage.

It takes a while to out this together.

The police don't edit videos like this for you.

The New York times had to wait a bit for the police to finish some stuff.

This stuff doesn't come out instantly they have to go through a process.

Because they got ahold of the footage.

So we've been told. As though it's a Fairy Tale with a good ending. And it's the NYT that gets the honor of telling it.

It takes a while to out this together. The police don't edit videos like this for you.

No, I wouldn't think it was the Vegas PD who authorized the release to the NYT, edit the footage, narrate the story, and tell the American public how it all went down.

I'm thinking it's more like...Speilberg.

The New York times had to wait a bit for the police to finish some stuff. This stuff doesn't come out instantly they have to go through a process.

Yeah. A "process" like sausage.

I don't believe a word of it. The whole thing reeks of bad propaganda. But then they know it but don't care. The Pods will lap it up with a spoon.

Again -- WHY is the lying Gray Hag New York Times the Media's Chosen Ones for this supposed revelation?

Who said they were chosen?

More like they chose to do the story and got the footage. I think they did a good job.

You apparently think they are part of the conspiracy. Why would they do that?

What has always struck me as odd is that Ammo weighs a ton. Seems like people were not paying attention at all. We could be talking nearly a 6-800lbs of ammo alone.

Another 200lbs in guns.

Who said they were chosen?

Weren't they? Why didn't it land in the lap of FNC?

The video's release required authorization. You know who has such authority.

You apparently think they are part of the conspiracy. Why would they do that?

The New York Times??

Who do you think has been THE recipient of most of the "leaking"? The NYT is easily a major tool, ally of The Left and enemy of Trump, and in on whatever The Swamp Plans. You don't?

This is such an obvious stunt to me. But hey -- everyone is entitled to their opinion...