"is accusing Star Trek icon George Takei of sexual assault in 1981."

You know George Takei must have approached hundreds of men of all ages for sex. It may not have been sexual "assault" but I'm sure it would fall into the category of "unwanted sexual advances".

Homosexuals get away with behavior a heterosexual would be fired for. Huge double standard.

Homosexuals get away with behavior a heterosexual would be fired for. Huge double standard.

Absolutely. Homofascists, like blacks and women are apparently "special" creatures.

All of them have managed to politically extract and buy extra layers of special judicial protections and shielding because of unconstitutionally legislated "Hate-Crime" AND "Hate-Speech" statutes. This is exactly why they get away with committing so many crimes and this insane moral/lawful double-standard.

Absolutely. Homofascists, like blacks and women are apparently "special" creatures.

Sure. They're not condemned or punished because that's who they are.

-------- -------------------------------

"Halfway across the river, the frog suddenly f felt felt a sharp sting in his back and, out of the corner of his eye, saw the scorpion remove his stinger from the frog's back. A deadening numbness began to creep into his limbs."

"You fool!" croaked the frog, "Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?"

The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog's back. "I could not help myself. It is my nature."

Sure. They're not condemned or punished because that's who they are.

Right...Identity Politics at its extreme.

BOTH parties are guilty of sabotaging the Constitution. And likely paid generously to do so.

"Equality" has NEVER been the goal of Social "Justice" Warriors. NOR Democrats. Homofascists, thugs, and THE worst of humanity have been using "Hate Crime/Speech" legislation and MSM/Hollywood/Sports propaganda to mug white, straight, conservative males LEGALLY.

Homosexuals get away with behavior a heterosexual would be fired for. Huge double standard.

Not to defend Takei at all but sex is sometimes ridiculously casual for the homos. So making a sex play for someone even if drunk or sleeping might not be unusual in some circles.

Far more serious is the implication that Takei drugged his victim. And if that is true and Takei was operating with knockout drops the way Cosby was, we should assume it happened more than once. So other accusers should come forward to say that Takei drugged them too.

This isn't some spontaneous eruption of women (or men) being suddenly offended or shocked to learn how many people in positions of absolute power operate as predators on those within their circle of power, how these various media heavyweights from multiple branches of media work together, how they use lawsuits to threaten and to buy silence, etc.

And it is a battle the Left seems to want to fight.

but sex is sometimes ridiculously casual for the homos.

I think it's expected, and that's what I'm referring to. Casual sex, anonymous sex, multiple partners, orgies, sex in public places (parks, restrooms, rest stops) -- all part of the homosexual lifestyle.

So we're supposed to accept is as "just the way they are". My question is, if homosexuals can get away with behaving this way, how long before heterosexuals adopt this lifestyle?

They sex themselves seeking more and more prestgtuo.

Prestgtuo? Isn't that an Italian spaghetti sauce?

Casual sex, anonymous sex, multiple partners, orgies, sex in public places (parks, restrooms, rest stops) -- all part of the homosexual lifestyle.

Yeah, just because a large number or even a majority of gay men are basically tomcats and very casual about sex, that doesn't mean all of them are.

Even if gay men are promiscuous generally, a majority probably does object to being drugged for sex. Or at least drugged against their will and not getting to choose what drug to take.

Casual sex, anonymous sex, multiple partners, orgies, sex in public places (parks, restrooms, rest stops) -- all part of the homosexual lifestyle.

You sound like a homo expert. Something you're not telling us?

A former model and actor is accusing Star Trek icon George Takei of sexual assault in 1981. The accuser, Scott R. Brunton, who was 23 at the time of the alleged incident, claims that Takei took advantage of him when he was most vulnerable.

Met GT (before outing) at a Historic Preservation conference in LA the US Army co-sponsored. One of our stops was the Japanese American museum where GT was a gracious host. He made all of us in dress uniform feel welcome and made sure we were fed well. He took photos with us afterwards and showed us the 442nd Regimental Combat Team memorial outside the museum.

To this day my SF buddy claims TK grabbed his 4th point of contact during a photo. Dunno....

To this day my SF buddy claims TK grabbed his 4th point of contact during a photo. Dunno....

Sounds like Takei was still willing to go where no man had gone before.     : )

You sound like a homo expert. Something you're not telling us?

Yep. That was it.

Yeah, just because a large number or even a majority of gay men are basically tomcats and very casual about sex, that doesn't mean all of them are.

Enough to generalize.

Less than 5% of the earths population are filthy sick twisted faggots

More like 2%. But they raise the odds by congregating in cities like San Francisco or Key West, neighborhoods, or bars and nightclubs. Or Hollywood.

Prestgtuo? Isn't that an Italian spaghetti sauce?

I really have no idea what that word was supposed to be. Yikes!

More like 2%. But they raise the odds by congregating in cities like San Francisco or Key West, neighborhoods, or bars and nightclubs. Or Hollywood.

Maybe now... but when this incident allegedly happened, early 80's, even in KOOKIFONIA, the fags stated in the closet... were they belong.

All the faggot Hollyweirdo's still had to drug or rape to overcome the lack of willing assholes. Pun intended.

My question is, if homosexuals can get away with behaving this way, how long before heterosexuals adopt this lifestyle?

Probably never.

The reason why the globalists promote the homosexual lifestyle is the same reason that they promote abortion and open borders for Western nations.

Their goal is to replace the indigenous Western population -- heterosexual Westerners having rampant promiscuity would be counterproductive to their goal.

heterosexual Westerners having rampant promiscuity would be counterproductive to their goal.

Then we need to hold homosexuals to the same societal standards. But in so doing, we'll be labeled homophobic.

So we'll end up defining deviancy down, lowering our standards to the level of homosexuals -- ending sexual monogamy in marriage, accepting those who have a different sexual partner every week, having unprotected anonymous sex with strangers, holding drug-fueled orgies, having sex in public places such as restrooms, parks and rest stops, etc.

One or the other. How do you raise children to accept everyone as equal, but have different standards for different groups? Hasn't worked with African Americans, has it? Quotas, preferences, lower standards -- that's resulted in resentment, not acceptance.