URL Source: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=87850

You should be ashamed to promote this kook site.

You're a fricking sheep.

PopCulture: Couple Who Survived Las Vegas Shooting Die in Car Crash

Kook away.

And guess who like clockwork barges into to another Vegas thread, barking like a moonbat: "KOOOOK!!! KOOOK!! KOOOK!!!!"

That's right: TooConservative aka "The Erasure."

At this point TC, your position and shilling is conspicuously obvious.

It wasn't a kook site when I posted other stories from there - now suddenly, it publishes a story that shows more evidence that the "official" Vegas shooting narrative you and others of your ilk are touting is bullshit and abracadabra - kook site.

You're a fricking sheep.

Right...

I can't even take the professional bleater seriously anymore.

The striking similarities between Kymberley Suchomel and Danny Contreras’s death are apparent:

1) They both reported multiple gunmen

2) They both reported gunmen chasing people in the crowd

3) Their version of events contradicted the “lone wolf” gunman narrative that Stephen Paddock carried out the attacks all by himself

Whether this disturbing series of deaths and disappearances is purely coincidental, or whether there is something deeply sinister afoot, has yet to be determined.

In cases like this, however, there’s rarely such a thing as “coincidence.”

The above is the chilling breakdown of an insidious plot.

Kymberley was found dead in her home a few days after giving her detailed account.

The PTB may be given the benefit of doubt on ONE coincidental death. BUT NOT TWO.

Chad Nishimura, Kymberley Suchomel and Danny Contreras??

Contreras' Tweet is indicting. Wow.

LVRJ reports: Based on Contreras’ tattoos, Metropolitan Police Department homicide Lt. Dan McGrath said it is possible he had gang ties.

But McGrath said the initial investigation showed that the killing likely was related to narcotics rather than gang activity.

"Possible," "likely" -- Chyeah, right.

LVRJ is no cred.

The "investigation" is a complete and utter sham.

This was a black op that went bad. OR rather went EXACTLY as planned.

That's right: TooConservative aka "The Erasure."

Since when have I become known as "The Erasure"?

You just made that up.

It wasn't a kook site when I posted other stories from there - now suddenly, it publishes a story that shows more evidence that the "official" Vegas shooting narrative you and others of your ilk are touting is bullshit and abracadabra - kook site.

No, it has been a kook site all along.

Let's examine another of their "stories".

SOTN: LAS VEGAS SACRIFICE: The Incredible Back Story Designed To Cover Up The Shocking Truth, 10/3/17

It's a kook site, run by a kook, written for kooks like you.

Since when have I become known as "The Erasure"?

Oh come now. Suddenly now you're shy??

A question is how often should a death be expected out of a pool of people the size of the LV concert.

A rough estimate: Assuming the concert had an audience of 10,000, and if the average life expectancy is 75 years, then that would mean an average of about 11 people per month would die for any cause. (10,000 / (75*12)). Of course that assumes a random age range of attendees which it probably wasn't.

Refined averages would show deaths from "natural" (old age) vs unnatural causes which would of course show a somewhat lower death rate, but still, even if it was half that, a half dozen deaths within one month of the event would not be above statistical norm.

And yes, if the size of that pool were lower considering only those outspoken about the number of shooters, that should be taken into consideration as well.

You should be ashamed to promote this kook site.

You should be ashamed of trying to reflexively erase every shred of plausible truth, witness, fact, and circumstantial evidence from your consciousness. Unless it's in your contract. Or sworn as part of your oath.

You'll forgive the rest of us for ignoring a weaponized, propagandist MSM (Wapo/NYT, etal) whose "job" is to outright lie, obfuscate, and release tangential diversionary disinfo. Maybe that's why you trust and rely on the "Legacy" Media for your "news."

It must be exhausting shilling for and/or accepting every default position of implausible/highly unlikely "official" Fairy Tales based on nothing but hot air, sloppy "investigations" and badly scripted narratives.

Repeatedly we have seen (and heard) the same "officials" who refuse to add 2+2 and indict when it comes to Hitlety's ILLEGAL Server, the Klintoon Foundation, the Russian Uranium Deal, Benghazi, The Tarmac Deal, relationship with the "Dossier" facilitators and Awan Bros...FOR STARTERS.

It is also noted that you have not nor will not responded to the above and have forged NO opinion or defense on why these issues are ignored...

But somehow YOU expect the rest of us to give an iota of credence to and blindly believe an honest investigation and account from these people regarding Vegas...or EVER??

If the Vegas Caper and it's "official" cast of actors are to be believed (as actual eyewitnesses discounted/knoked off, alternative investigators are intimidated and threatened), one can reasonably conclude that you are either in denial here OR playing "Gate-Keeper"/Erasure.

A search on the name shows a lot of sites repeating the claim, so it seems the person and death is real.

A question is how often should a death be expected out of a pool of people the size of the LV concert.

Ok, I believe we can all accept that premise.

By the current count, we've had three deaths. YOUNG PEOPLE.

What are the further odds of those considered "hard" witnesses dying? And two tweeting? (one that he was being chased?)

Other factors to consider:

Circumstantially and anecdotally, we have several reports of confiscation and erasures of all info on phones.

We have the disappearance of Campos.

We have NO hotel video of the perp.

We have ballistics tests and ear-witness accounts of more than one shooter.

Hard drives by the alleged "perp" that have walked away.

We have a collective "authoritah" who have purposely been slow, sloppy, and incurious. But immediately ID's the perp, even as far as disseminating his bloody "suicide."

We do NOT know how many other witnesses have been intimidated into silence (a disturbing trend that goes back to TWA Fl 800...and yes, Bubba-vile.)

We have ballistics tests

Where?

Circumstantially and anecdotally, we have several reports of confiscation and erasures of all info on phones.

If true, there is ZERO justification for law enforcement to do that, and further, doing so is immoral and counterproductive in a civilized society. The moral of the story is that any time one is required or compelled to turn over digital evidence to law enforcement, make a copy first.

We have the disappearance of Campos.

I am thinking Campos has some dirt of some kind, possibly for being an illegal or some other paperwork violation that could be completely unrelated to the shooting, and that the attention the shooting is bringing him places him at risk of that dirt being discovered. If so, his suspicious activities might have nothing to do with the shooting.

We have NO hotel video of the perp.

The hotel likely has a strong motive to conceal as much info from the public for reasons related to civil liability related to the event. The USA is a sue happy country, after all, so I'd consider their silence a normal business response.

Law enforcement investigators, however, has no such compelling motive so they don't have that excuse.

We have ballistics tests and ear-witness accounts of more than one shooter.

I don't know that we have formal ballistics tests showing that. We have informal studies that do, however. It would seem certain that if there were indeed multiple shooters from 2+ substantially different locations, there should be plenty of forensic evidence of that, not the least of which would be spent bullets that don't match any of the rifles in Paddock's room.

Hard drives by the alleged "perp" that have walked away.

Very valid concern.

We have a collective "authoritah" who have purposely been slow, sloppy, and incurious. But immediately ID's the perp, even as far as disseminating his bloody "suicide."

If it were not self inflicted, but physically forced or occurred at an earlier time, there should again be plenty of forensic evidence of that.

Overall, the authoritahs are relying on plausibility of events in general. That works if the facts and data are limited to vague generalities regarding key aspects of the case.

Regarding the lack of hotel video, yes, that could be considered a liability issue. BUT, wouldn't that be confiscated or subpoenaed and/or released for dissemination by HONEST authoritahs in such a crucial case given the weight of the case and slaughter and public outcry for transparency and justice? Isn't there already mega-liability if it's accepted that Paddock is the perp, and shot hundreds of people from the hotel as it is? How much worse can it get?

I don't know that we have formal ballistics tests showing that. We have informal studies that do, however.

"Informal" is the best we're going to get I'm afraid. Regarding ANY forensics.

Since "Formal" = "Official," we know where this is heading (*cough 911*)

Yes, the phantom hard drives situation (IF it is to be believed as part and parcel of the "formal" narrative) is...inexcusable.

We have also forgotten how the supposed "perp's" girlfriend was allowed to get on a plane to Asia and return. Immediately after the slaughter. Makes NO sense.

With respect to the alleged perps alleged suicide (and hundreds of casings allegedly fired at Campos), again, "investigators" and forensic experts are either burying their findings or this is just one more scripted Act and Scene.

Regarding Campos, the reason as you stated is plausible. But it discounts other reasons and factors as well.

It doesn't discount other possible motives. But it is one of many and should be reasonably considered with the others.

Isn't there already mega-liability if it's accepted that Paddock is the perp, and shot hundreds of people from the hotel as it is? How much worse can it get?

Ask a trial lawyer and he'll give you and earful, I'm sure.

We have also forgotten how the supposed "perp's" girlfriend was allowed to get on a plane to Asia and return. Immediately after the slaughter. Makes NO sense.

I understood she went to the Philippines weeks prior to the event, paid for by Paddock, supposedly to get her out of the way of his plans.

With respect to the alleged perps alleged suicide (and hundreds of casings allegedly fired at Campos), again, "investigators" and forensic experts are either burying their findings or this is just one more scripted Act and Scene.

I do agree there has been too little info released by the police.

It [Campos role?] doesn't discount other possible motives. But it is one of many and should be reasonably considered with the others.

"Should" is the keyword here.

As far as we know, Campos made his suspicious debut on 'Ellen' as she conspicuously declared his controlled, scripted appearance should be considered the punctuation of his Vegas role and any further public appearance, whereby he scooted out to Who-Knows-Where. Unfettered by TMZ and a MSM who've stood down on any follow up.

WHAT did Campos know, WHEN did he know it, and WHY was his supposed "testimony" permitted by the authoritahs? WAS he designated to be THE sole corroboration of Paddock as a hotel "guest" in that particular room??

As to hotel "liability" claimed to be a reason no vid exists of Paddock, that appears to be a red herring. The Hotel is already liable up the wazoo. Am I imagining this but is the lack of video in several high-profile bloody cases (Fl 800/911/THIS case etal all are lacking. In an age where there are camera on every cornor, from every angle, it's more than conspicuous that no video exists of Paddock -- especially in Vegas.

(Btw, we've also forgotten the several other cases of shootings and high alert at OTHER casinos/hotels that same night that are conspicuously ignored/dismissed by the "legacy MSM" as well as authoritahs.)

I do agree there has been too little info released by the police.

And conspicuously, too little curiosity by a "legacy MSM". I'd presume the Po-Po have been advised to back off getting too curious.

I understood she went to the Philippines weeks prior to the event, paid for by Paddock, supposedly to get her out of the way of his plans.

Thanks for that account.

Anyone have any idea who the source(s) of that dissemination were? LVPD? Alphabet agys? And why haven't we more info about her background and involvement with Paddock? (rhetorically speaking.)

I am thinking Campos has some dirt of some kind, possibly for being an illegal or some other paperwork violation that could be completely unrelated to the shooting, and that the attention the shooting is bringing him places him at risk of that dirt being discovered. If so, his suspicious activities might have nothing to do with the shooting.

Assume he is an illegal alien. Also, he was not registered to work as a security guard. And he was a material witness to a case with 58 or 59 murders, thousands of attempted murders, hundreds of people shot, and he was allowed to leave the jurisdiction of the United States. It is enough to raise suspicion.