On Thursday, the House voted to pass Kates Law.
The law is named after Kate Steinle, an American woman who was shot to death in San Francisco by an illegal alien who had been deported numerous times.
The House passed a total of 2 bills today, which will go a long way in cracking down on illegal immigration.
One of the bills will deny federal grants to sanctuary cities.
The other bill, known as Kates Law, will severely punish deported aliens who illegally return to the United States.
Twenty-four Democrats voted for Kates Law.
Justin Amash was the only Republican to oppose it.
Amash is a Palestinian Republican congressman who represents Michigans 3rd District.
Michigan, he needs to go.

UNITED STATES Ð MAY 10: Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich.
#1: nolu chan To: Gatlin (#0)
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2017/roll344.xml
The Roll Call vote on HR 3004, Kate's Law, 29 June 2017
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I believe this tweet by Justin Amash addressed his vote on Kate's Law, sort of. I do not find any explanation given as to why he finds the bill unconstitutional. The second bill he alluded to was about sanctuary cities.
Looking at the text, I note that the bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act under Title 8. It does not amend or create a provision under Title 18, the criminal statutes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
https://twitter.com/justinamash?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Justin Amash
Verified account @justinamash 23h23 hours ago
I voted no today on two bills that together violate the 1st, 4th, 5th, 10th, and 11th Amendments. I will always defend our Constitution.
4,730 replies 1,051 retweets 3,431 likes
Justin Amash
Verified account @justinamash Jun 29
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Text of Kate's Law
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
nolu chan posted on 2017-06-30 19:01:51 Reply Private Reply
#2: Justified To: nolu chan (#1)
Justified posted on 2017-06-30 19:13:56 Reply Private Reply
#3: nolu chan To: Justified (#2)
It's not clear to me. I guess it must await a clarification by Amash. The only thing I could think of was this imposed severe penalties of imprisonment without resort to creating or changing a criminal statute.
nolu chan posted on 2017-06-30 23:32:23 Reply Private Reply