The New York Times attempted to take a cheap ideological shot at President Donald Trump by comparing organization attendance by the New England Patriots football team between President Obama and President Trump:
The picture the New York Times used is expanded below:
However, the cheap shot attempt backfired against the New York Times when the New England Patriots organization pointed out they were not comparing accurate attendance.
In the 2015 picture the support staff were on the stairs, in the 2017 picture the staff were seated in the audience.
The entire 2017 organization attendance was captured in their follow-up tweet to thank President Trump.
Additionally, the New England Patriots provided context for player participation:
#Patriots won two Super Bowls in three years, 36 players visited the White House. Today, we had 34.pic.twitter.com/Aslvf1RaXU
Yes, the New York Times is busted again with their ongoing ideological “fake news” efforts!
#1: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#0)
So who cares if the rest of them went.
These sporting crossover events are as phony as the Hollyweirdos hanging out at the White House. Or the endless succession of presidential dogs, almost none of whom had dogs or cats prior to becoming prez. I recall the Xlintons had that cat, Socks (I think). They gave it away when they left the WH. Same with their dog, Buddy (I think). And Buddy got run over by a car a few months later anyway. Bush had a dog, not sure what happened to that mutt. And I don't think the 0bama's are vacationing on the superyacht with their two ugly mutts either. We'll never see the 0bama's with those dogs again.
And the phoniest will be when Trump, a self-described germophobe, finally has to get a dog for the White House so he can pose for a few pictures with it.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 09:00:06 Reply Private Reply