BREAKING : White House POOPS on Hillary’s Recount Bid, “There was no Election Hacking”

Source: truthfeed.com
Published: Nov 26, 2016
Author: Amy Moreno
Post Date: 2016-11-26 23:48:26 by Gatlin
Views: 4898

As Hillary Clinton begins her (pointless) recount of the blue states that abandoned her, Obama’s White House has come out to say that there is no evidence of any “hacking” swaying the election.

Hillary Clinton made a huge stink over the fact that Donald Trump would not agree to the election outcome weeks before a single vote was cast.

Hillary claimed that Trump’s refusal pre-accept the election outcome was a THREAT to our democracy.

Click HERE to read the remainder of the article.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: rlk    To: Gatlin (#0)

White House POOPS on Hillary’s Recount Bid, “There was no Election Hacking”

There probably was, but it was done by Democrats to favor Hillary and Democrats. Leave well enough alone.

rlk posted on 2016-11-27 00:03:12   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Vicomte13    To: rlk (#1)

Exactly. If we had secure voting, there would be a million or more fewer Democrat votes than the tallies show.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-11-27 09:58:27   Reply   Private Reply

#3: misterwhite    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

"If we had secure voting, there would be a million or more fewer Democrat votes than the tallies show."

I've read estimates of 2-3 million illegal voters in California alone. I doubt they were voting for Trump.

misterwhite posted on 2016-11-27 10:19:36   Reply   Private Reply

#4: sneakypete    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

If we had secure voting, there would be a million or more fewer Democrat votes than the tallies show.

There would also be fewer Dim state and feral Senators and congresscritters.

sneakypete posted on 2016-11-27 10:25:40   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Vicomte13    To: sneakypete (#4)

I rather hope that one of the reforms Trump pushes through the courts is a voter ID requirement for all federal elections. The very things that are called "voter suppression" are, in truth, ILLEGAL voter suppression. And that's a good thing.

There is pressure to go to the popular vote and to leave behind the electoral college. If you do that, then corrupt precincts in Philadelphia and Chicago can churn out fraudulent votes to cancel out the real votes of whole states.

The Electoral College acts as a firewall that contains the fraud to a few states with big corrupt Dem machine cities.

I doubt that Hillary Clinton really won the popular vote of living, legal voters who only voted once.

In Iraq they handled voter fraud by dying fingers blue. Maybe that is part of the answer.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-11-27 10:54:36   Reply   Private Reply

#6: A K A Stone    To: Vicomte13 (#5)

The Electoral College acts as a firewall that contains the fraud to a few states with big corrupt Dem machine cities.

100 percent agreement there.

If no electoral college states like California would manufacture enough votes to win.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-11-27 11:52:09   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Vicomte13    To: A K A Stone (#6)

If no electoral college, the fraud manufactured in Philadelphia, Chicago, LA and Oakland would wipe out the real votes of 15 states.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-11-27 12:24:26   Reply   Private Reply

#8: sneakypete    To: Vicomte13 (#7)

If no electoral college, the fraud manufactured in Philadelphia, Chicago, LA and Oakland would wipe out the real votes of 15 states.

Which tells you why the Dims want it. Even with their massive voter fraud machine up and humming,they STILL have trouble getting elected.

sneakypete posted on 2016-11-27 12:47:17   Reply   Private Reply

#9: redleghunter    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

Democrats have always had a great illegal turn out machine :

1863 New York City.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9eL-4F8lFc&app=desktop

redleghunter posted on 2016-11-27 13:11:55   Reply   Private Reply

#10: redleghunter    To: Vicomte13 (#5)

In Iraq they handled voter fraud by dying fingers blue. Maybe that is part of the answer.

The finger actually looked purple but very possible they used blue ink and when dried to the finger turned purple.

Could be an answer however I think early voting allows for greater fraud.

Much harder to monitor polls when some states start early voting in early October. Maybe one solution is to restrict early voting to one or two weeks out instead of 4-6 weeks.

redleghunter posted on 2016-11-27 13:23:06   Reply   Private Reply

#11: redleghunter    To: A K A Stone (#6)

redleghunter posted on 2016-11-27 13:34:19   Reply   Private Reply