Gary Johnson's running mate, Bill Weld has already declared Hillary to be free from criminal intent.

All three of these pinheads are former Republican Governors.

Anyone but Trump! You can not have a non party man in charge!

Anyone but Trump!

Not surprised that you'd considering writing in Satan. You're already well over half way there, with the Trump & Rodham team.

Never D&R! Voting pro-American again this cycle, Darrell Castle/Scott Bradley, Constitution Party.

---

The only two that can win it are Hillary or Trump. Trump is by far the least evil by a million miles. The 2 worst candidates in the history of America are Obama and Hillary.

We are either going to move into a EU style govenrment or back track. I prefer to back track than finish off the republic and replace it with a pure socialist style central government.

BTW watch what you ask for you might just get a Hillary government. Just like Obama Hillary is untouchable and has the means to cram down the peoples throat any and all programs she desires.

The only two that can win it are Hillary or Trump. Trump is by far the least evil by a million miles. The 2 worst candidates in the history of America are Obama and Hillary.

That asshole doesn't care about any fact you said... He wants his DRUGS legalized.

The only two that can win it are Hillary or Trump.

You two have chosen to support Satan. You can't see any way out, because you block everything but evil, out.

NO, you don't have to choose the Satanic D&R party. There are alternatives, but you refuse to consider them. No wonder evil triumphs.

Pathetic!

You're the clueless piece os shit that supports the faggot johnson for several years. Why would anyone listen to a dumb piece of shit like you who is a gay johnson cock sucking groupie?

supports the faggot johnson for several years

#2 >> Voting pro-American again this cycle, Darrell Castle/Scott Bradley, Constitution Party.

finish off the republic and replace it with a pure socialist style central government.

BTW watch what you ask for you might just get a Hillary government.

Just like Obama Hillary is untouchable and has the means to cram down the peoples throat any and all programs she desires.

1st
an
emporer
king

now
a
queen

Make
America
great
a
republic
again

love
boris

ps

... e

... pluribus

... doomum

Again huh. You don't deny that you pimped for a new world order piece of shit fudge packing open borders hondo clone.

Make no mistake I think you are a piece of shit.

If this gets elected you will be part of the purge.

Spit!

So if I accidentally knock off a convenience store I'm good because I did not intend to do it?

accidentally knock off a convenience store

That just sounds like a fake excuse!

It's like the degrees of murder. If you plan to murder and do it, it's first degree. If it's an accident it's a lesser crime. Perhaps more like negligent homicide. Like running over a few kids, while searching for a religious broadcast on the radio. ;)

IMO Hillary was running a bathroom based email server to cover up some crimes she was planning, which indicates intent. How long has it been since the Department of State and the CIA weren't planning crimes? Probably long before I was born.

If this gets elected you will be part of the purge.

Yeah, I forced the GOP to nominate a loser, and you to vote for the loser, so that Hillary wins. /s

That's projection. Y'all did it to yourselves by allowing Karl Rove and the neocons to manipulate the nomination process.

At least you didn't go for the superloser, Jeb!

so that Hillary wins.

Don't be a mentally ill dill-doe. You suck up MSM's bullshit poll numbers. Poll numbers that poll (D)'s and (R)'s.... but there is a huge voice that hasn't been heard yet. It's called the independent voters. They will overwhelmingly vote TRUMP.

It will be unfortunate for Hillary and her asshole apologists like you, Johnson pimp, that intent has nothing to do with her actions. Intent in no way factors into the applicable statute, 18 USC 793, nor does it mention the word “classified.” It’s all about information concerning the “national defense.”

793 (f) specifically makes it a crime for anyone “entrusted with … any document … or information relating to the national defense … through gross negligence (to permit) the same to be removed from its proper place of custody.”

It is of no consequence that “Bill Weld has already declared Hillary to be free from criminal intent” since it is a jury and not a former governor who will best determine gross negligence on the facts of the case.

... which indicates intent.

Forget "intent."

Intent has nothing to do with the crime she may be charged with.

See Post #14.

it is a jury and not a former governor who will best determine gross negligence on the facts of the case.

You'll have to settle for what opinions you can get since a jury will never get to hear the case. Your President Obama will give Hillary and her lesbian associates a pardon.

There's no need for you to try to plea bargain Hillary's treason down to a lowly gross negligence beef. Obongo's got your back, counselor Tater.

You'll have to settle for what opinions you can get since a jury will never get to hear the case. Your President Obama will give Hillary and her lesbian associates a pardon.

I'll have to disagree with you, as I usually always do.

I think there will never be the need for a pardon ... I am afraid there will never be a charge.

Thanks for making an intelligent post, sans the stupid cartoons ... see, you REALLY CAN do it.

Now, keep it up ... seriously.

I looked again at your post in response to this post.

You misunderstood what I said, as you usually always do ... that happens often with closed minds.

I was not defending Hillary or saying that the charges should not be there. I was merely pointing out that "intent" in not mentioned anywhere in the law. So when anyone says "she had no intent" ... that doesn't mean shit. She can still be charge without intent.

Having explained this for your problematic reading comprehension ... I still feel that Obama has put the word out to the AG that she is not to be charged.

indicates intent

Intent? Or arrogant disregard?

She's been playing the game of arrogant disregard for 45 years protected by the power and influence of the man to whom she married. RLK, the Analytic Papers.

Hillary had no criminal intent, Mitt Romney condisering endorsement

Romney has had one thing going for him. He's his father's son. Based upon that last name he was able to found an investment company that bilked people out of everything they had, pocket $300,000,000, then go on into a meteoric political career. If he, and others like him, had not been born, the world would be a far better place.

sorry ,doesn't look like an honest mistake to me. She was head of the State Dept and their long standing policy was that normal day-to-day operations should be conducted on an authorized Automated Information System (AIS), which "has the proper level of security control to … ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident information. " The quote is in the State Dept OIG review of Evita's emails . The least damning explanation for her behavior is that she wanted a system outside the proper system so she could avoid having her emails subject to FOIA . The more probable reason for her taking such a risk is that she wanted to hide her criminal activites regarding a 'play for pay' relationship between the Clintoon foundation and donors and clients .As Sec State she could promise some big favors for the right price.

Her server was hacked ...she was aware of it ...and did not report it to computer security personnel . So it is clear that she was also trying to hide content from the State Dept. (and trust me ,it wasn't details of Chelsea's wedding she was trying to hide) . If she were not from the Clintoon crime family ;if she had an R next to her political affiliation ,then the whole weight of the government and the compliant press would've already crashed down on her . It is already a terrible indictment of the inequality of our justice system ,and the corruption inside our government ,that she is a presumptive nominee for the Presidency.

"Gary Johnson: Hillary had no criminal intent"

Hillary is not being investigated for criminal intent. She's being investigated for criminal actions.

" Gary Johnson: Hillary had no criminal intent, Mitt Romney condisering endorsement "

Obviously Johnson, Weld, and Romney, are all idiotic dickheads.

Gary will kill the Libertarian party. Open borders has not and can not work. There are some political ideas that can not be implemented in reality and be made to work. There are many other issues with LP.

Romney is just jealous.

Weld who? ;)

Gary Johnson's running mate, Bill Weld has already declared Hillary to be free from criminal intent.

Truth is Clintons are nothing but criminal intent. Its proven truth through their whole history of politics. There has never been a more crooked politicians then they Hillary!

All three of these pinheads are former Republican Governors.

Pathetic and misguided individuals, the entire lot ... but that they are former Republican governors is the problem.

All 3 are libertarians and the libertarian philosophy is inherently flawed.

Libertarians cannot do anything right and they cannot get anything done.

Look no further back in history to review the accomplishments, or the absence therefore, of Ron Paul for solid verifiable evidence.

All 3 are libertarians

Romney and Weld are not libertarian in the least. They're George W. Bush "compassionate conservative", globalist, America last, Republicans.

You're out of the closet as a Romney, gay canary libertarian voter now!

They definitely are not “compassionate conservatives.”

They are in no way “conservatives” under any criterion I use.

I categorize them as libertarians because of their stupidity and irrational political views.

If you are not all in for defeating Hillary, then you are definitely a senseless Paultard libertarian deviate.

I was never been an “in the closet” voter for Romney, or McCaIn for that matter, in the challenge against Obama.

I am an “out of the closet” voter for anyone who has the best possibility to defeat a Democrat for POTUS.

That’s my reasoning.

Now, what’s your excuse for not wanting to prevent Hillary from becoming president?

If she were not from the Clintoon crime family ;if she had an R next to her political affiliation ,then the whole weight of the government and the compliant press would've already crashed down on her .

Indeed. Remember the CBS reporter who rented a home next to Palin's house? How the MSM picked apart Sarah Palin's background back to when she was President of the PTA? Or how the press jumped on Harry Reid's "I received an anonymous phone call Mitt Romney has not paid his taxes in years."

If we got 10% of the effort put into the Clintons as we did the "Rs", Hitlery would be behind bars.

All three of these pinheads (Johnson, Weld, and Romney) are former Republican Governors.

All 3 are libertarians and the libertarian philosophy is inherently flawed.

And you voted for Romney.

Guess that makes you a libertarian by your logic.

I think both Weld and Johnson are poor choices for the LP to run. I wouldn't vote for either of them - Johnson is pro-open borders, and Weld is a gun grabbing liberal.

You're out of the closet as a Romney, gay canary libertarian voter now!

Gatslime just keeps making a bigger fool out of himself with each idiotic post he makes.

" Gary Johnson: Hillary had no criminal intent. . . Bill Weld has already declared Hillary to be free from criminal intent. "

Well, isn't that special. Did they have advance notice of what Comey was going to say, or did Comey get his line from them ? Inquiring minds would like to know.