"libertarians are really “weird sickos.”

Well, no one was harmed through force or fraud, so this behavior is totally acceptable. Even without the thong.

this what indulging in a copious amount of marijuana one night and then continuing to get wasted through the next morning does

Trump hired the stripper to discredit the Libertarian Party so that Johnson/Weld don't take any votes from your gal, the D&R Party anointed one Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Rodham/McCain 2016

Dude, clean yourself. Why fret over McStain? Even though that filthy RINO is about 30% more popular than that old scumbag Paultard, NEITHER are ever gonna run again. So, when you cry about McStain, you show your true colors and the FACT that you are closer to a (D) than a (R) by the very fact you hate McStain WAY MORE than any (D).

You've been outed. We all know you will vote for Commie Sanders.

no one was harmed through force or fraud

Which is the sum total of that infantile philosophy.

A candidate for Libertarian Party chair on Sunday danced and stripped down to his thong

Thank goodness it wasn't DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

"no one was harmed through force or fraud"

Which is the sum total of that infantile philosophy.

Much better that government should enforce moral virtues like "compassion" and punish moral failings like "greed", eh, Hillary?

A candidate for Libertarian Party chair on Sunday danced and stripped down to his thong

Thank goodness it wasn't DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

What a repulsive visualization you have conjured up ... YUK!!!

Trump hired the stripper to discredit the Libertarian Party ...

No one needs to hire anyone to discredit the Libertarian Party ... showing a complete lack of skill and with the absence of any ingenuity, the individual libertarians have displayed lasting endurance to show that they can fully discredit themselves without assistance from anyone.

Look no further that the libertarian posters here on LF to validate this.

"Thank goodness it wasn't DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz."

What a repulsive visualization you have conjured up ... YUK!!!

Sometimes my mind goes to dark, disturbing places ...

a complete lack of skill and with the absence of any ingenuity

displayed lasting endurance to show that they can fully discredit themselves without assistance from anyone

Both 2016 presidential/VP Libertarian Party candidates are former Republican, two term governors, so they've got a good excuse. They're experienced Republicans! If they showed up on your ballot with an (R), you'd vote for them.

William Weld 1991 – 1997 (Massachusetts Governor)

If they showed up on your ballot with an (R), you'd vote for them.

If one of them were to be running against Hillary for POTUS, then perhaps … but that would be the only time.

Anyway, I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup then crap and come up with a better name of a presidential candidate than your libertarians.

Much better that government should enforce moral virtues

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Much better than your pedophile philosophy, sicko.

'Much better that government should enforce moral virtues [DECEPTIVELY OMITTED BY ROSCOE:] like "compassion"'

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

That in no way implies that government should enforce moral virtues, so is irrelevant.

Much better than your pedophile philosophy

I have no such philosophy, sleazy liar. Government rightly enacts and enforces laws against child sex, rape, murder, and theft (to name a few) not because they are "moral virtues" - which compassion also is - but because they are violations of rights - which lack of compassion is not.

you hate the Constitution

More baseless and indefensible lies from the spouting sewer Roscoe.

Tough luck for you, sicko.

When told that we cannot legislate morality

A statement I never made nor implied; violating rights is immoral and unlike immoral non-rights-violating acts is within the proper authority of government to legislate.

1. That in no way implies that government should enforce moral virtues

2. violating rights is immoral

You're humiliating yourself.

I've fully explained myself and intelligent readers get it

The voices in your head?

Poster's Note: Is this what indulging in a copious amount of marijuana one night and then continuing to get wasted through the next morning does to libertarians, causing them to submit to unusual and amusing antics.

Most like intoxicated on alcohol or prescription drugs.

Or maybe even just plain nuts.