WE GET LETTERS
But isnt all of this Outside job stuff just going to benefit the Neo Cons? GlobalCorp? someone emailed. Did the Saudis put the (alleged) Hijackers in Rudy's flight school? Give them Govt Credit cards? Schedule identical Drills the morning of 911? Tell Cheney to run the stand down? Operate the cover up? I dont see anything coming from this. Shot over the bow of the kingdom by Economic hitmen
My websites down till later this week. Was hacked in January, so Im switching hosts. Things happen. Im not blaming the Illuminati.
Ill give this a shot. A last shot, hopefully. Otherwise Im bored with it. Anyone whos seen as much obvious disinformation being parroted back at them as holy writ by people whose reasoning facility is on a par with that of George W. Bushif thatprobably feels the same.
What I saw in Florida: The Saudis were running it. They were everywhere. Tell me: who's got more money to pay bribes than Saudis? No one. Whos taking bribes in America? Everyone. Everyone whose name you already know, and everyone whose name you dont. Its a corrupt country. Deal with it. Its Rome in 200 AD.
Islamic fundamentalist or lieutenant in an Arab drug cartel?
In 1999, there were a handful of Arab flight students in SW Florida. In 2001 there were thousands. At a big AFB base in the Panhandle, a trainer told me, "It used to be Iranians. Now its all Saudis."
Were they there by themselves? Hell no. Did the CIA know? Hell yes. I asked an old hand, in a highly irate tone of voice, how could the CIA not have known blah-di-blah blah. His answer was mild. Why, Im sure that they did know. He said, It would have been impossible for them not to.
Venice and the surrounding region was teeming with spooks. The Sheriff in nearby Charlotte Countywhere Atta lived for a time, though you wont find that in the 9/11 Commission Reporttold me that, because of the 40-year history of covert activity that he had seen been run through Charlotte County, which he and everyone else in the Charlotte County Sheriffs Department had been powerless to stop, he believed the CIA was responsible for 9/11.
Was one of the bigger shocks of my life. A Southern cracker Sheriff telling me he thought the CIA was responsible for 9/11. And hey. Maybe hes right. But I couldnt go there. I might believe that. But I never had proof.
Despite that, I heard a lot, saw a lot, and learned a lot in Florida. For 18 month Venice Florida was the home base of the terrorist hijackers. It was the biggest 9/11 crime scene that wasnt reduced to rubble. And I uncovered more evidence about the terrorist conspiracy's activities there than anyone, more than every other reporter in America combined.
Because there were no reporters or investigators or researchers in Venice. Except me.
I drove 1000 miles in the dead of winter in a 15-year old car with a faulty heater to find and interview Mohamed Attas girlfriend. Nobody else knew hed even had one. Except three tiny local newspapers in SW Florida. I posted the entire interview.
43 lbs. of heroin is known in the trade as heavy weight
I discovered the most important secret thats come out so far about the 9/11 attack. The owner of the flight school that trained Mohamed Atta had his Learjet busted just three weeks after Atta arrived, carrying 43 lbs. of heroin.
Because of this, in 50 or 100 years, or maybe a thousand, depending on when the truth finally comes out, someone will be grateful that I did. That makes me feel good. I was, at least, useful.
One of the reasons being put forward to release the 28 pages involves testimony from Z. Moussaoui. In Welcome to TerrorLand theres testimony from a cabbie who picked up Moussaoui in Venice, where no one else reports that he was. He's been visiting some of the boys at an apartment in Venice. The cabdriver (theres only two in Venice) had been to that address a dozen times, taking Arab men to the airport in Orlando.
The cabdrivers asked to help carry luggage to the cab. He says okay. Its a trunk, and it weighs almost more than two people can carry. Thats all he knew. Later I asked an ex-NSA agent what could weigh that much. He answered without even pausing to think: Gold.
Saudis in San Diego
and Florida
In a brief one-week trip to Southern California, I uncovered and exclusively reported evidencewith resources an assistant manager at McDonalds would sneer atabout the man the Chairman of the Joint Congressional Intelligence Committee investigation into 9/11 called the best chance to uncover the Sept. 11 plot before it happened.
The New York Times said, Of all the people who had contact with the 19 men, perhaps no one found himself closer than Dr. Shaikh, 65, a gregarious retired educator who has lived for years in this working class suburb of San Diego.
The paper reported, Dr. Shaikh was quite proud of his positions of civic responsibility, particularly on a citizens review board at the police department.
History Commons says: Despite much scrutiny after 9/11, little information will emerge on Shaikhs background or why he came to the FBIs notice.
Abdussattar Shaikh was identified in wire reports as a retired professor of English at San Diego State, and Vice President for International Projects at American Commonwealth University.
I discovered he was nothing of the kind. Every single detail in his biography was a lie:
He never taught at San Diego State; He has never been a Professor of English anywhere; He has a phony PhD purchased from a bogus diploma mill run by people with U.S. military and intelligence connections; The University where he was supposed to be Vice President or International Projects does not, in fact, exist.
Oh, and Abdussattar Shaikh is not his real name. (His real name is Abdussattar Chhipa.)
So when someone sneeringly asks me a question about something or other concerning 9/11 containing the insinuation that he or she (almost always he) has divined the truth with a superior ability to avoid being a sucker that is otherwise nowhere in evidencewith gaps in logic big enough to fly a 767 through without leaving marks my response is, really, no response.
The Pentagon has a 1600-man battalion that does nothing but psyops. And H.L. Mencken said: No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
You can see the problem.





#1: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
You cant see that Daniel Hopsicker is a government mole and the Messiah of Government 911 truth damage control.
It surprises me that you posted an article by Hopsicker but thanks for doing so.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 04:01:07 Reply Private Reply
#2: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 04:20:46 Reply Private Reply
#3: Operation 40 To: Gatlin (#1)
You're a laugh riot, Gatlin. But you knew that. What brought you back? I'm absolutely sure that I'm not the only one that is delighted to see you again.
Operation 40 posted on 2016-05-22 09:31:10 Reply Private Reply
#4: Logsplitter To: Deckard (#0)
Logsplitter posted on 2016-05-22 12:15:56 Reply Private Reply
#5: GrandIsland To: Operation 40 (#3)
Move to Colorado or stfu. States have a legal right to regulate or ban drugs. Marijuana is classified as a drug.
If you require an anything goes turd fest in life, then go buy an island in the middle of the ocean and you can have your own little world filled with fag bathrooms, meth vending machines and lazy high hippies playing xbox daily. You can even invite Ron Paultard to be mayor... and finally he might be able to get a law passed.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-05-22 14:36:40 Reply Private Reply
#6: Gatlin To: Operation 40 (#3)
I don't give a rats ass whether you are delighted to see me here again or not.
Your satisfaction or dissatisfaction about my return is of absolutely no concern to me.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 16:12:28 Reply Private Reply
#7: Deckard To: Gatlin, Operation 40 (#6)
Thanks for the laugh.
BTW - here are a few more facts for you to chew on :
While much of the evidence supports the idea that Kirks thinking was impaired, none mention a potential link between impairment and violence. If anything, the doctors testimony points in the other direction, painting a picture of those suffering from acute psychotic episodes as near lifeless and hardly moving. You can feel like youre dying, a representative from a cannabis potency testing lab says of over-consuming.
After noting that edibles have a ton more THC, the owner of Colorados largest medical marijuana dispensary notes that while over consuming is very unpleasant, it doesnt cause violence.
If you eat too much marijuana, you have hot flashes and cold flashes and then you get under the covers and pass out, said Steve Horwitz of Ganja Gourmet. You dont start waving a gun around.
Science has proven that THC can induce an acute psychosis, it has not drawn a link between this psychosis and violence. On the contrary, studies about the drugs likelihood of causing harm to others show that those using it are more likely to be nonviolent.
One of the earliest comprehensive looks at the link between cannabis and psychosis came in 2007 with systematic review of 35 studies by Dr. Theresa HM Moore. Published in The Lancet, the study concluded that cannabis could increase the risk of psychotic episodes, especially in those predisposed to mental illness, but that researchers had yet to determine why.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-22 16:32:20 Reply Private Reply
#8: Gatlin To: Operation 40 (#3)
How long has marijuana been used as medicine?
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 16:52:07 Reply Private Reply
#9: Gatlin To: Deckard (#7)
And I am also suppose to believe that line of bullshit after a college student eats more than the recommended dose of a marijuana-laced cookie and jumps to his death from a hotel balcony.
Along with:
An autopsy report listed marijuana intoxication as a significant contributing factor in the death of 19-year-old Levy Thamba Pongi. The other contributing factor was a sudden impact with the ground.Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 17:08:58 Reply Private Reply
#10: Operation 40 To: Gatlin (#8)
From the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute:
The use of Cannabis for medicinal purposes dates back to ancient times
http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/cam/patient/cannabis-pdq#section/all
You DO remember that the Federal Government holds a patent on the use of Cannabinoids, don't you? US PATENT #6630507. You can search the number if you've forgotten.
Also from the link above:
Hemp for Victory!
Operation 40 posted on 2016-05-22 18:12:25 Reply Private Reply
#11: Operation 40 To: Gatlin (#9)
That's horrible, but not common.
Certainly not as common as violence from taking or withdrawing from SSRI's, as you can clearly see at this link (click on all stories):
ssristories.com An example:
MORE: ssristories.com click on All Stories
Operation 40 posted on 2016-05-22 18:18:48 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: Operation 40 (#10)
I dont find its use as a medicine dates back 10,000 years, but I knew that it had been around a long time.
Do cannabis and cannabinoids have ANY benefits in treating the symptoms of cancer or the side effects of cancer therapies?
This quote states only MAY amd INTEREST IN this nebulous considerations are of no real value.
While the above-displayed quote does indeed appear on Cancer.gov, this does not mean that cannabis has been proved to kill cancer in humans. In fact, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) clarified the referenced statement by saying that insufficient evidence exists to recommend cannabis for use by cancer patients: There is not enough evidence to recommend that patients inhale or ingest Cannabis as a treatment for cancer-related symptoms or side effects of cancer therapy. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not approved Cannabis or cannabinoids for use as a cancer treatment.
Why would the Government want to own a patent on a drug that has no medicinal value, is highly addictive and toxic?
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-22 21:12:18 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Operation 40 (#11)
By being fully aware that theyre saying something wrong, they feel compelled to attempt to justify it and do so by pointing to other usually worse actions. The existence of a worse atrocity, however, does not actually justify anything it merely points out that there have been similar things in the past.
People who use this as a justification may be well aware that it's logically fallacious, and use it purely as rhetoric, or as a distraction.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-23 00:25:29 Reply Private Reply