Tacoma, WA On May 24, 2014, 15-year-old Monique Tillman and her brother were riding their bikes when they were stopped and this young girl brutally assaulted by Tacoma Police Officer Jared Williams.
Tillman and her brother had done nothing wrong, and were merely targetted by this public servant because they had the unfortunate luck to have crossed paths with him.
As the duo travelled home, they cut through a mall parking lot, as they had done countless times before. However, this time, Officer Williams was in that parking lot, in his full Tacoma Police department uniform, yet off-duty, working as mall security. As the teens travelled through the lot, Williams began pursuit of these hardened criminals and accused them of trespassing.
Knowing theyd done nothing wrong, Monique attempted to explain to the officer that they cut through the parking lot all the time on their way home. However, this tyrant was having nothing of it.
As the duo attempted to ride away from a man whose intentions were clearly unscrupulous, Williams attacked. A recently released surveillance video shows the disturbing scene that unfolded next.
This heroic officer ripped the girl from her bike and slammed her up against a parked car with his hand around her neck. As the child struggled to breathe, this abusive tyrant grabbed her by the hair and flung her around like a rag doll.
Clearly overpowering the small child, half his size, the officer wasnt satisfied with the damage hed inflicted so far. So, for good measure, Williams pulled out his taser and sent 50,000 volts into this poor girl.
He was choking me, grabbed me by my hair and tried to slam my face into the concrete. The next thing I know, Im on the ground being tased, Tillman said.
Now face down, tasered, handcuffed and brutalized, Williams stood over his victim like a hunter and his kill. He had protected society from the likes of a dangerous brother and sister riding their bicycles.
Williams then arrested Monique and charged her with resisting arrest and, get this, assault on an officer.
After viewing the surveillance video of the incident, however, all of the charges were thrown out.
Vito de la Cruz, Tillmans attorney, has filed a lawsuit seeking damages from Officer Williams, the Simon Property Group who owns the Tacoma Mall and Universal Protection Services, the private security company in charge of Tacoma Mall security.
A child riding a bike should not have to worry that a police officer will stop her without legal cause and brutalize her, said de la Cruz. Our communities are weary of another African American child being hurt by unwarranted and excessive police force.
The Free Thought Project reached out the Tacoma PD to inquire about Williams current status and if any disciplinary action had been taken. However, our requests for comment were not returned.
Below is what policing in modern day America has become.
#1: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:07:22 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: Gatlin (#1)
A couple of kids riding their bikes are "rowdy teens terrorizing neighborhood"?
Look, I know you are one of the "cops are gods" contingent here at LF, but seriously?
You really believe that the story you posted somehow justifies the cops behavior?
Williams then arrested Monique and charged her with resisting arrest and, get this, assault on an officer.
After viewing the surveillance video of the incident, however, all of the charges were thrown out.
You must have missed that part.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 13:14:29 Reply Private Reply
#3: sneakypete To: Deckard, *Crime and Corruption* (#0)
Cops ALWAYS charge the people they have beaten up with assault. It gives them paperwork "justification" to claim "I was only defending myself!" if the victim complains.
Notice how "I was just defending myself!" is NEVER seen as justification for a citizen defending him or herself from attack by a cop,though.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:18:57 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:25:15 Reply Private Reply
#5: sneakypete To: Deckard (#0)
The most important thing to point out is that HE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO STOP HER TO START WITH. A shopping center parking lot is by definition public property,and he has no legal or moral authority to stop anyone from entering it at any time of the day or night.
Which nullifies the first point about her resisting arrest. He had no right to stop or try to arrest her,so she can't be charged with resisting an illegal arrest.
Officer Cartman was just having one of those "You WILL respect my authoritay!" moments. SOB should be fired and sued by both the city and the girls parents.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:27:18 Reply Private Reply
#6: Deckard To: Gatlin (#4)
I didn't see either one of the kids riding their bike in the possession of a weapon.
Perhaps you need to look at the video.
Your attempt to portray these two innocent kids as hardened criminals is beyond pathetic, but as we are all well aware, you suffer from a pathological fetish for authority.
Once again - the 15 year old girl riding her bike who was brutally assaulted by police had nothing to do with any shootout.
Your miserable attempt to defend the cops' actions here speaks volumes of your dishonesty and lack of character.
Williams then arrested Monique and charged her with resisting arrest and, get this, assault on an officer.
After viewing the surveillance video of the incident, however, all of the charges were thrown out.
Yet you continue to defend the cops.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 13:34:37 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Deckard (#2)
Donr ask me I wasnt there.
Nope, I seriously dont.
I read that.Nope, I did not miss that part.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:36:31 Reply Private Reply
#8: sneakypete To: Gatlin, *Crime and Corruption* (#1)
Last time I went to the city for a doctors appointment,there were maybe 6-8 black teens and a couple of black pre-teens standing in the divider between two 2 lane city streets,throwing rocks at passing cars. No reason for it,they were just laughing and having a good time.
It must be stated they were standing directly across from the entrance to a welfare housing tract of condos,and when I first spotted them they had hit a Jeep Wagoneer with rocks,and the driver had came to a screeching halt in the road,and started to get out of the jeep,which caused them all to haul ass for mama's crib.
When you don't teach your children responsibility,don't be surprised when they act like wild animals and get locked up.
If society really wanted to stop this crap all they would have to do would be force mama out of the "free" government housing,cut off her check she is paid to take care of the children she is getting paid welfare to raise,and put her off sprung into child care where they could be taught manners. I can guarantee you that you won't have to cut off the "free" housing,paychecks,and food stamps to more than 2 or 3 professional baby mamas before the rest of them take a sudden and rabid interest in the conduct and activity of their bastard children.
There is an old truism is that states "When you don't expect anything,don't be surprised with nothing is what you get."
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:36:59 Reply Private Reply
#9: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#1)
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you all,unless you are millionaires.
You can thank Bathhouse Barry and the rest of the Tan Klan for that.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:38:54 Reply Private Reply
#10: Deckard To: sneakypete (#5)
Trying - maybe.
She got about a foot away before the "hero" sprung into action, saving the day from these hardened criminals.
HE HAD NO AUTHORITY TO STOP HER TO START WITH. A shopping center parking lot is by definition public property
That is my understanding as well, and since the kids had apparently done this on a number of occasions, it seems like the cop saw a opportunity to flex his authority on a couple of innocent kids.
What, you don't expect him to actually go after real criminals, do you?
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 13:40:07 Reply Private Reply
#11: sneakypete To: Deckard (#2)
Ahhh,but these were "safe" ones to jump because it was in the middle of the afternoon,and one of them was a young girl.
You don't really expect them to go after male hoodrats between 15 and 25 years old running in packs after dark,do you.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:40:49 Reply Private Reply
#12: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#4)
Why wasn't Trent charged with attempted murder?
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:45:36 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Deckard (#6)
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:46:30 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: sneakypete (#12)
I have no idea ... do you think he should have been?
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:47:15 Reply Private Reply
#15: Gatlin To: sneakypete (#9)
We are in complete agreement !!!
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:49:02 Reply Private Reply
#16: sneakypete To: Deckard (#10)
And there you are in all your glory,admitting against your will that she WAS trying to get away.
The "she was only a foot away......" excuse is lame beyond belief. How far away would she have to be before you would admit she was tying to avoid arrest,a half block?
Not that the cop had any authority at all to stop her. He didn't.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:49:19 Reply Private Reply
#17: Deckard To: Gatlin (#13)
Don't be an ass.
You were attempting to link criminal activity by others to the two kids riding their bikes, insinuating that the two kids must be guilty simply for living in the same neighborhood.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 13:51:00 Reply Private Reply
#18: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#14)
Yes. He pulled a gun out of his pants and gut shot someone standing 5 feet away. How could that not be attempted murder?
Now,if he were still being attacked or the other guy had already pulled his gun,that would be different.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 13:51:36 Reply Private Reply
#19: Deckard To: sneakypete (#16)
So what if she was?
The cop had no business stopping her, that much has already been established.
She was under no obligation to stay.
Looking at the video again, it's not clear that she was trying to get away. She moved the bike forward yes, but that's it.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 13:56:02 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: Deckard (#10)
By whose definition ... yours?
A shopping center parking lot is public property only is it is government owned.
If the shopping center parking lot is privately owned, then it is private property.
You will need to show me why a security guard hired by the private property owners cannot stop someone in the privately owned parking lot ... do so, please.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:57:02 Reply Private Reply
#21: Gatlin To: Deckard (#19)
Established by whom?
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 13:58:05 Reply Private Reply
#22: nativist nationalist To: sneakypete (#8)
nativist nationalist posted on 2016-05-14 14:02:09 Reply Private Reply
#23: Gatlin To: Deckard (#19)
Where is this proven incorrect?
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 14:03:08 Reply Private Reply
#24: Deckard To: Gatlin (#20)
There you go again, still trying to find a way to defend the cop's actions.
The kids were riding their bikes through the parking lot as they had done numerous times before without incident.
I'm sure the owners of the mall (Simon Property Group) would be disgusted with the actions of the cop.
You - not so much
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 14:08:02 Reply Private Reply
#25: Deckard To: Gatlin (#23)
What were they searching for in this case?
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 14:09:11 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: Deckard (#19)
Oh, you HAD to LOOK at the video TWICE ... after you told me to "look at the video again?
You say it's not clear that she was trying to get away.
There is no audio, so it is not clear to me that she did not say, "you can't stop me for anything, you fucking pig and I am leaving rat now and you can't do anything about it ..."
I did notice it odd that there was a video from high above that actually followed the kids and the cop across the parking lot and the video stopped when they stopped. That could smack as a "set up" to me for a possible programmed confrontation with planned actions for the purpose of bleeding money from the city. Things like that have happened ... a number of times ... right? Not saying this is the case here ... just saying it has happened.
Of course the city dropped the charges, what else do you expect the PC government assholes to do this day and time ... the assholes are frightened of anything and everything this day and time.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 14:53:31 Reply Private Reply
#27: Gatlin To: Deckard (#25)
You are ready to admit the Tacoma Mall parking lot is private property ... right?
Most malls will not permit skate boarding or bike riding in their parking lot for liability reasons and because it endangers customers. This may have been the case here ... bicycling was prohibited. A possibility ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 14:54:57 Reply Private Reply
#28: Gatlin To: Deckard (#17)
Wrong, I was neither attempting nor insinuating anything.
I only wanted to watch you go through your completely programmed and practiced routine, making suppositions to fit your agenda and cause.
You did and I laughed at your standard reactions again while you were doing it..
You are so predictable
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 15:02:35 Reply Private Reply
#29: Deckard To: Gatlin (#26)
Attaboy!
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 15:05:25 Reply Private Reply
#30: Gatlin To: Deckard (#29)
We dont know why the security officer decided to stop them. It may have been an arbitrary decision by the security officer to do so, although I doubt that. I would lean more to him actively enforcing rules, regulations, policies and procedures as established by the mall management.
I have considered conjectures posted on this thread. Now, I will offer one of my own.
Suppose bicycle riding and skate boarding is prohibited in the Tacoma Mall parking lot in a written directive by management with posted signs (although posted signs are not legally required). Then suppose these kids had cut through the lot a number of times before (wait that is no supposition they admitted to doing that) and were told a number of times before to stop doing it. Suppose the security officer saw them doing the same thing again and stopped them. Then the kid challenged his authority, pulled away from him and started to leave.
We don't know that happened and we don't know that it didn't happen. We don 't know what actually happened ... other than what is perceived from the video.
All this does not excuse the officer from using excessive force, if that was determined to be the case by prominent authority. But, it may point out that the kids were not innocent victims just in field training for the next Black Lives Matter get together.
You fuckin bleeding heart liberals need to get with reality and stop falling hook, line and sinker for the thought channeling these professional propagandist put you through in their biased articles with an agenda.
Do I believe that is ever going to happen with you HELL, NO!!!
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 15:49:01 Reply Private Reply
#31: Don To: Gatlin (#4)
Don posted on 2016-05-14 16:03:53 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: Don, Deckard (#31)
What did she do? You didn't watch the video, did you? If so, then where did you see "four" people? I missed that ...
I don't know what really happened, but it looks like he was writing her a citation and she started to leave. He grabbed her arm to retain her and she struggled.
Excessive speed is one of the restrictions posted against bicycle riders in most all mall parking lots. It is not possible to tell how fast the bicyclist were traveling, but it is readily apparent the security vehicle was traveling quite fast to catch up with them.
When he did, the officer listened patiently to the girl and then he apparently pulled a citation book from his right side shirt pocket and started to write a ticket. The girl started to leave and the security officer grabbed her to detain her. She struggled with him and he pinned her against a vehicle to restrain her. I would never have dropped the charges of resisting arrest she obviously did.
That is the way I see it you see it anyway you want to.
Was this the case here I dont know.
But with all the PC this day and time and the frighten candy assed civil servants it could have been.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 16:24:24 Reply Private Reply
#33: Deckard To: Gatlin (#32)
Good grief - is there no end to your absurdity?
Just how fast do you think the two kids were traveling? 5 mph? 10 mph?
This is just more of your usual deflection tactics in an attempt to to exonerate the cop.
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 16:29:47 Reply Private Reply
#34: Gatlin To: Deckard (#33)
These EDITED tapes NEVER show the BEFORE ... only the part they can draw perceived conclusions from. These cop-hating pseudo-journalists structure their presentation so carefully and lead gullible people, like yourself, down primrose path to believe what you already want to believe.
If the civil authorities continue to not back their officers ... that will lead to a point where the officers will say, "fuck it" and turn their heads to all infractions.
That will eventually lead to anarchy. But, wait ... anarchy is what you hope and pray for, I almost forgot.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 16:55:20 Reply Private Reply
#35: nolu chan To: Deckard, Gatlin, sneakypete, GrandIsland (#0)
https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/05/washington-cop-attacks-girl-for-riding-bike-blames-her-for-attacking-him/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLuuvmJ6L_Y
0:49 Officer Williams appears to take out book to record information or write a citation
0:55 Officer Williams begins writing
0:56 Suspect Tillman starts to ride off and is stopped by Officer Williams
1:07 Suspect Tillman held against vehicle; resists Officer Williams
1:14 Officer Williams right hand is on upper chest of Suspect Tillman, not on neck or choking
1:25 Suspect Tillman continues to resist and is wrestled away from vehicle
1:27 Suspect Tillman wrestled to the ground and continues to resist
1:34 Officer Williams starts to draw Taser
1:38 Suspect Tillman, on ground, is tased; stops resisting.
Suspect Tillman is handcuffed by unidentified Security Officer.
See still photos:
Hand not on neck
Tased while on ground
Resisting
From the COMPLAINT:
Clearly, it is not Officer Williams who handcuffed Tillman. It is one of three security officers on the scene. Their uniforms are distinctive and different. Officer Williams stood aside as this took place.
This appears strange. Was Tillman found not guilty after trial? Did the trial proceed to its end? A clarification of what actually happened at trial would be helpful.
What injuries? The Complaint does not specify any physical injuries.
Again, physical injuries are cited but not specified.
http://komonews.com/news/local/tasered-teen-it-felt-like-electricity-running-through-my-veins-11-21-2015
nolu chan posted on 2016-05-14 17:04:00 Reply Private Reply
#36: Gatlin To: nolu chan, Deckard (#35)
Ah Ha! I knew that the didn't stop them just to write an invitation to his birthday party. I figured they must have committed some offense.
So, Deckard, Mister Always Right Cop-Hater ... will you ever wait until you have all the information available before you pass judgment on cops and find them guilty of everything.
The answer to that, of course ... is No, Never.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 17:12:13 Reply Private Reply
#37: Gatlin To: nolu chan (#35)
Thank you ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 17:14:22 Reply Private Reply
#38: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#36)
He's batting .000 for the year.
Roscoe posted on 2016-05-14 17:39:13 Reply Private Reply
#39: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#38)
He is pathetic.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 18:00:22 Reply Private Reply
#40: Deckard To: Gatlin (#34)
This was a SURVEILLANCE tape made by the mall security camera.
Now you are claiming the video has been edited?
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 18:23:46 Reply Private Reply
#41: Deckard To: Gatlin, nolu chan, Roscoe (#36)
Oh - he "claimed" that, did he?
Then why were the kids not charged with that offense?
Deckard posted on 2016-05-14 18:27:28 Reply Private Reply
#42: Gatlin To: Don (#35)
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 18:31:46 Reply Private Reply
#43: Don To: Gatlin (#32)
Don posted on 2016-05-14 18:52:05 Reply Private Reply
#44: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
Because his good hearted nature caused him to be benevolent and his kindly feelings were motivated by sympathetic understanding to let her off with a verbal warning: Telling her she was causing a disturbance and going to be trespassed, or banned, from the mall. He also warned her that she could be arrested if she were to return. Besides, she was charged in juvenile court with resisting arrest and assaulting an officer .... to pile on charges against the lovely poor innocent girl who was so demure and polite while conforming to social norms would be cruel and inhumane.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 19:00:06 Reply Private Reply
#45: Roscoe To: Deckard (#41)
They were arrested on other charges. You want more?
Roscoe posted on 2016-05-14 19:07:38 Reply Private Reply
#46: nolu chan To: Deckard, Gatlin, Roscoe (#41)
I reckon that's because traffic infractions are not criminal offenses and are not charged in criminal court.
nolu chan posted on 2016-05-14 19:09:14 Reply Private Reply
#47: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#41)
You and people like you are the reason I arrested everyone that caused me to put my hands on them. astonishingly, many officers with bleeding libtarded hearts still lay hands on and then, feel bad and don't arrest. Then the liability suits come in for excessive force... and the scumbags attorney claims his client was an angel because he/she wasn't arrested. It doesn't pay to have a heart and soul... because of scumbags like you.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-05-14 19:25:24 Reply Private Reply
#48: Gatlin To: Roscoe, Deckard (#45)
They are determined to gain power through constant arguing. Their bullying and physical violence, coupled with their refusal to follow rules and assume responsibility for their actions, along with their cursing and threatening behavior needs to be addressed.
Dealing with oppositional defiant juveniles can be frustrating and exhausting. Excusing their uncivil actions by wrongfully misplacing blame on an officer performing his duty is an abomination.
Gatlin posted on 2016-05-14 19:51:21 Reply Private Reply
#49: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#20)
By any sane definition known to man.
Or do the words "open to the public" confuse you?
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 20:47:09 Reply Private Reply
#50: sneakypete To: nativist nationalist (#22)
The Future Felons of America and dey mama's might not like it,but it's still true.
sneakypete posted on 2016-05-14 20:48:24 Reply Private Reply