The more I know about Trump,the more I wonder how much Wharton charged his father for his degree. Or maybe they had a lookalike take his classes for him?

"We are the gold standard of political parties. I think any candidate would be lucky to have Reince Priebus as a chairman and they should be begging him to continue the successes he's had," Spicer said."

The successes? What were they?

We lost the 2012 election and, under his "leadership", we're poised to lose it again. He promised to repeal Obamacare if we gave him the majority. We did. He didn't. He promised to stop Obama's executive orders on immigration. He didn't.

We gave Republicans control of the House AND Senate and HE HASN'T DONE SHIT!

Trump: If I win, I might keep RNC chairman

Proof that Trump is either a retard, or a NWO shill.

Absolute loyalty to Jeb!, or anything else with an R

We gave Republicans control of the House AND Senate and HE HASN'T DONE SHIT!

Do you have a mouse in your pocket?

" Trump: If I win, I might oust RNC chairman "

Another reason to vote for Trump

"Another reason to vote for Trump."

Out with the old and in with the new. The guy is establishment all the way, good at one thing -- maintaining the status quo of the members of his little club.

Trump: If I win, I might oust RNC chairman

He knows that, that's why he's going to fight like hell to see that you don't get elected.

Why not? After all,he is going to be the President of the world and make Mexico pay for a 50 foot tall wall,so what's firing someone that doesn't work for him amount to?

The RNC has a tradition of handing the reins to the titular head of the party. Of course, they could choose to have a four year pissing contest with President Trump. If they can't handle candidate Trump, one can just imagine how they will do with President Trump, the FBI, the IRS, and the Justice Department.

In your mind, the RNC can tell the sitting president to go screw himself. The sitting president will always have more power to screw with them. The president has a mighty strong power of suggestion.

As for party deference, here some examples:

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1986-09-13/news/8603080401_1_maureen-reagan-republican-national-committee-republican-chairman

Gop Finds 1st Father Knows Best

September 13, 1986
By Jon Margolis
Chicago Tribune.

WASHINGTON — The last time Maureen Reagan ran for office her father didn`t do a thing for her, and she got walloped.

Now she`s trying again, for a less lofty post, and this time her father just guaranteed her election.

With what he called ``great pleasure,`` Republican National Chairman Frank Fahrenkopf announced Friday that, at the urging of President Reagan, he would support Maureen Reagan`s candidacy to become co-chairman of the Republican National Committee.

[...]

http://millercenter.org/president/biography/bush-life-before-the-presidency

George H. W. Bush: Life Before the Presidency

[excerpt]

President Nixon removed Bush from the United Nations in 1973 and asked him to serve instead as chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC). The administration turned to Bush to head the RNC because of his reputation for respectability and integrity. During the Watergate scandal, Bush was a tireless supporter of President Nixon until the release of the White House tapes.

He replaced Bob Dole.

Lee Atwater was the campaign manager for G.H.W. Bush who was elected in 1988, inaugurated in 1989. And Atwater was named chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Trump: If I win, I might oust RNC chairman

And exactly how will this moron do that? The same way as he would order the military to start waterboarding again?

The successes? What were they?

You might have to ask Michael Steele. You might not want to ask him too much about Rinse Penis.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/14/michael-steele-former-rnc-chairman-blasts-gop-enemies-after-being-booted.html

Michael Steele Blasts GOP Enemies

Lloyd Grove
10.14.11 8:24 AM ET
The Daily Beast

[excerpt]

Steele says a turning point in his tenure came when RNC members voted overwhelmingly to a take out a $15-million line of credit over his objections, he claims, “because I’m a Republican and I didn’t want to spent money we didn‘t have.” Among those who favored the loan, Steele says, was RNC general counsel Reince Priebus, who later used fiscal irresponsibility as an issue in his successful campaign to unseat Steele as chairman. “Some of the people egging me on included the current chairman, who signed off on this deal and thought it was the best thing for me to do,” Steele says. “And to sit back now and act like, ‘Oh my God! We have all these problems! All this debt!’ Well, motherfucker, you’re the one who voted for it. I didn’t vote for it. I’m the one who said no.”

And exactly how will this moron do that?

See #8.

The same way as he would order the military to start waterboarding again?

He would not have to order it. It was done before without a presidential order. Torture has never required presidential orders. It just happens.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_cure_%28torture%29

Philippine–American War

Water cure was among the forms of torture used by American soldiers on Filipinos during the Philippine–American War. President Theodore Roosevelt privately assured a friend that the water cure was "an old Filipino method of mild torture. Nobody was seriously damaged whereas the Filipinos had inflicted incredible tortures on our people." The president went further stating "Nevertheless, torture is not a thing that we can tolerate." However, a report at the time noted its lethality; "a soldier who was with General Funston had stated that he helped to administer the water cure to one hundred and sixty natives, all but twenty-six of whom died". See the Lodge Committee for detailed testimony of the use of the water cure.

Lieutenant Grover Flint during the Philippine–American War:

A man is thrown down on his back and three or four men sit or stand on his arms and legs and hold him down; and either a gun barrel or a rifle barrel or a carbine barrel or a stick as big as a belaying pin, – that is, with an inch circumference, – is simply thrust into his jaws and his jaws are thrust back, and, if possible, a wooden log or stone is put under his head or neck, so he can be held more firmly. In the case of very old men I have seen their teeth fall out, – I mean when it was done a little roughly. He is simply held down and then water is poured onto his face down his throat and nose from a jar; and that is kept up until the man gives some sign or becomes unconscious. And, when he becomes unconscious, he is simply rolled aside and he is allowed to come to. In almost every case the men have been a little roughly handled. They were rolled aside rudely, so that water was expelled. A man suffers tremendously, there is no doubt about it. His sufferings must be that of a man who is drowning, but cannot drown.

In his book The Forging of the American Empire Sidney Lens recounted:

A reporter for the New York Evening Post (April 8, 1902) gave some harrowing details. The native, he said, is thrown on the ground, his arms and legs pinned down, and head partially raised "so as to make pouring in the water an easier matter". If the prisoner tries to keep his mouth closed, his nose is pinched to cut off the air and force him to open his mouth, or a bamboo stick is put in the opening. In this way water is steadily poured in, one, two, three, four, five gallons, until the body becomes "an object frightful to contemplate". In this condition, of course, speech is impossible, so the water is squeezed out of the victim, sometimes naturally, and sometimes – as a young soldier with a smile told the correspondent – "we jump on them to get it out quick." One or two such treatments and the prisoner either talks or dies.

Proof that Trump is either a retard, or a NWO shill.

Or both.

The same way as he would order the military to start waterboarding again?

He would not have to order it.

The moron stupidly said he would order it. Just one of his many gaffs. The guy doesn't know when to shut his mouth. That is why he keeps sticking his feet in it and then having to back track and do damage control.

Post #8 is a bit lame as it is oblivious to political realities.

"In your mind, the RNC can tell the sitting president to go screw himself. The sitting president will always have more power to screw with them. The president has a mighty strong power of suggestion."

First, I never said anything of the sort. But you seem to think that a sitting POTUS can tell the RNC to go screw themselves. It doesn't work that way. Second, if Trump has any chance of winning in Nov. he is going to need the RNC big time. If Dollar Donald really is in it to win (which he is not) he will make nice to get that support and then he owes those folks - he'll go along to get along. If he doesn't and turns around and f*cks them then he will not have the support of the party for what will be his one and only ineffectual term.

But as I keep telling you the only reason con man Trump is running is to assure Hillary wins in Nov.

In your mind, the RNC can tell the sitting president to go screw himself.

They can,and they will. They got Reagan to take Poppy as his running mate by threatening to withhold all support for him if he didn't.

The sitting president will always have more power to screw with them.

The exact opposite is the truth. Presidents can't do squat without the backing of their party. Why do you think the big money guys that run the country would rather work behind the scenes to pull their strings rather than try that while in the WH? It ain't because any of them are shy,modest,or lacking in confidence. It's because the real power is at the top of the party leadership.

Proof that Trump is either a retard, or a NWO shill.

Or both.

My vote is for "both". If he hadn't been lucky enough to be born into a family with hired financial advisors and lawyers well-versed in the real estate business,he would be trying to sell pencils on the street. The man doesn't have enough good sense to pour piss out of a boot,and if he did manage,it would be purely accidental. I have no idea how much it cost his father to buy him a degree from Wharton,but there is no way he was smart enough to have earned one.

Trump: If I win

The seeds of doubt. Dump actually admitting the possibility that he might lose

The seeds of doubt. Dump actually admitting the possibility that he might lose

When Trump takes a dump. You're there like a fly.

Your country is a bunch of pussies who let the government take your guns.

Wusss.

Reince & Co.: I'm closing in on the nomination and may very well become President. Your future depends upon what you say and do regarding me now. You should be supporting me, but you're not. You're not being neutral either. You're actively trying to defeat me.

And when you fail and I win anyway, you're going to want to make nice, but at that point I will have no use for you. So you had best look to your own futures now and stop fucking with me during the remainder of the campaign, because I'm going to win anyway, and when I do, I'm going to fuck you over for the next eight years and beyond.

The Party has already shown me that a housecleaning is needed. The only question in my mind is: who is going to do it? And by the way you're acting, Reince, I'm thinking that there will be no role for you in the new regime.

You could change my opinion by not being a putz.

The seeds of doubt. Dump actually admitting the possibility that he might lose

Ted Cruz mathematically eliminated

from any chance to secure 1,237 bound delegates before the convention.

In New York, the presumptive candidate Donald Trump opened such a can of whupass, the now mathematically eliminated Ted Cruz was ignominiously relegated to third place, 45 points behind Trump and ten points behind John Kasich.

R.I.P. Cruz campaign, April 19, 2016

Priebus is the quintessential, spineless toady who will bend-over and spread his cheeks for Trump at the convention.

That seems to be the most basic requirement to get the job,but most of these guys are looking for payback once they have the power they have lusted after their whole lives,and really,what is the purpose of having power if you can't abuse it?

" Trump: If I win, I might oust RNC chairman "

Another reason to vote for Trump

So,who do you think he will replace him with,Bill Clinton? Bloomberg? Rudy? All of whom are Trump goombas.

Or maybe he will suck up to people much more successful than him,and give the spot to Soros,Gates,or the PayPal guy in hopes they give him some stock and maybe invite HIM to one of THEIR parties?

" who do you think he will replace him with "

I have no idea.

That said, it is quite obvious that Reince Priebus is a toady for the Establishment, and has done nothing positive for the Republican Party, or for the nation!

He needs to be replaced! Then let him sell bags of cow shit for gardens.

That said, it is quite obvious that Reince Priebus is a toady for the Establishment, and has done nothing positive for the Republican Party, or for the nation!

The one thing I am sure of is that the same can and will be said about whoever replaces him. It is a closed circle at the top,and they are not about to allow anyone within the circle that might disturb their deals and grip on power.

" It is a closed circle at the top,and they are not about to allow anyone within the circle that might disturb their deals and grip on power. "

For the most part, I agree. However, if Tump wins the nomination, then wins the election, they will not be able to stop him without a 168 gr HPBT

That said, it is quite obvious that Reince Priebus is a toady for the Establishment, and has done nothing positive for the Republican Party, or for the nation!

Not going to happen. He would have already dropped out if it hadn't been for the NE voters coming along at this time to bail him out of oblivion.

He's looking good right now,but all the advisors in the world can't keep this buffoon from running his mouth and broadcasting his insanity.

If he gets the alleged Republican nod,Bubbette! will be our next president.

" it is quite obvious that Reince Priebus is a toady for the Establishment, and has done nothing positive for the Republican Party, or for the nation! "

Are you saying that statement is wrong? If so, why?

I still stand by my statement:

" it is quite obvious that Reince Priebus is a toady for the Establishment, and has done nothing positive for the Republican Party, or for the nation! "

Are you saying that statement is wrong?

Of course not. I'm saying the creature that replaces him will be just like him. It's a requirement for getting the job.

How could I make it any clearer?