anyone notice the success the Syrian army has been having in Syria or since the US is not involved perhaps it isn't newsworthy?
Interesting what happens when you take some of the combatants out of the picture and let an army do what it is supposed to do.
I think this might upset the Turks and the Saudi a little and perhaps even the US military industrial complex because we can bet Russia will get all those reequipment and reconstruction dollars.
The Syrian army might even finish the war before the US allies, now I can remember they ran last in another important race, remember WWII
#1: Vicomte13 To: paraclete (#0)
There are different ways to look at World War II, of course.
Viewed from the perspective of purely American national interest, American entry in World War II was very well-timed.
From the perspective of the best interest of many others, an earlier US entry would have been preferrable; from the perspective of two of America's most important allies today, their best interests would have been best served had America never entered.
It's all a matter of perspective.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-04-06 12:43:27 Reply Private Reply
#2: SOSO To: paraclete, All (#0)
It is very newsworthy but since it is damning of both His Highness Obama and Her Highness Hillary it is not being covered by the MSM.
SOSO posted on 2016-04-06 14:57:30 Reply Private Reply
#3: paraclete To: SOSO (#2)
how can a conflict that affects millions and in which the US is engaged not be covered? Do you live in a news vacuum over there?
paraclete posted on 2016-04-06 20:00:25 Reply Private Reply
#4: SOSO To: paraclete (#3)
Of course not, mate. We have a great MSM that gives all the news they choose to. Can you guess who the MSM is supporting for President?
SOSO posted on 2016-04-06 20:30:08 Reply Private Reply
#5: paraclete To: SOSO (#4)
paraclete posted on 2016-04-06 22:42:12 Reply Private Reply
#6: SOSO To: paraclete (#5)
You weren't?
SOSO posted on 2016-04-07 00:15:48 Reply Private Reply