(CBS NEWS) According to the CBS News Wisconsin Republican primary exit poll:
Cruz is running well across many groups of Wisconsin primary voters. He is beating Trump among men and women by about 10 percent, and he is ahead of Trump in all age groups.
Trump did less well in Wisconsin among groups of voters who have been his core supporters in previous primaries.
Cruz is winning among those with college degrees and among those without. They are about even among those with no more than a high school degree.
Cruz does better among more affluent voters but still runs almost even with Trump among those with incomes under $50,000.
Cruz runs well among those who said they are very conservative as he has in previous primaries, but he also edges out Trump among those who said they are somewhat conservative. Trump has generally beat Cruz among those who say they are somewhat conservative. Trump does lead Cruz among political moderates.
As many as 34 percent of Republican primary voters say that bringing needed change is the candidate quality that most mattered in their vote decision; Cruz and Trump run neck and neck among these voters. This is better than Cruz has done in previous primaries. Cruz ran well ahead of Trump among voters who said that they want a candidate who shares their values and among those who wanted a candidate who can win in November.
Sixty-five percent of Republican primary voters said they were very worried about the direction of the nations economy, and Cruz beat Trump among these voters.
Seventy percent support a temporary ban on Muslims who are not U.S. citizens entering the country, and Cruz and Trump are very close among this group.
Trump does beat Cruz among those who want to deport illegal immigrants who are not U.S. citizens, but only about one in three Republican primary voters support this position. Cruz topped Trump easily among the majority of primary voters who want to offer illegal immigrants a chance to apply for legal status.
Trump did very well among the half of Republican primary voters who want the next president to be from outside the political establishment, but he only got 7 percent of the vote of those who prefer the next president to have political experience.
The Republican exit poll asked voters, If no one wins a majority of the delegates before the convention, should the party nominate the candidate with the most votes in the primaries or the candidate who the delegates think would be the best nominee?
More than half, 56 percent, said the party should nominate the candidate with the most votes. Another 42 percent said it should be the candidate who the delegates think would be the best nominee. However, this varied widely between Trump and Cruz voters. As many as 83 percent of Trump voters said the nominee should be the candidate who won the most votes in the primaries. Among Cruz supporters, 56 percent said it should be the best nominee, and 42 percent said it should be the candidate with the most votes.
#1: A K A Stone To: ConservingFreedom (#0)
Fuck Ted Cruz and his anti American new world order trade agenda.
Spit.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-04-05 22:02:51 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hondo68 To: ConservingFreedom (#0)
The Cruz voters are right. This is NOT a democracy it's representative Republic.
Letting the elected delegates decide is what's supposed to happen in a Republic.
Trump voters are mob rule democracy collectivists, like Bernie supporters.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-04-05 22:13:17 Reply Private Reply
#3: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#0)
buckeroo posted on 2016-04-05 22:19:38 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: buckeroo (#3)
And you'd vote for Trump or Kasich?
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 22:32:13 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#1)
Cruz waffled around on TPA/TPP, trying to be on all sides of the issue over the course of a month.
I don't have any idea of what his real position is.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 22:34:09 Reply Private Reply
#6: buckeroo To: TooConservative (#4)
buckeroo posted on 2016-04-05 22:37:25 Reply Private Reply
#7: Tooconservative To: ConservingFreedom, A K A Stone (#0)
Other minor helps for Cruz is Priebus is from WI and so is Speaker Ryan (who Trump badmouthed in his hometown, Janesville). A crowd of Trump's crackpots cheered him for that but it could not have played well with the WI GOP voters at large. Wisconsin GOP voters are rightly proud of the power of the state GOP they've built up and its major role in national GOP politics.
I'm not sure if Walker is interested but this could signal a cabinet position for him, certainly consideration on the Cruz VP short list. Kasich is better positioned than Walker for VP. So is Rubio who is carefully guarding his 170+ delegates to keep them bound to him until the convention when he could release them and urge them to vote for Cruz so he could become VP (or SoS or SoD). Kasich is the guy Cruz would want as VP to run against Hitlery (and carry indispensable Ohio) but Rubio is the guy that Cruz may not be able to win the nomination without.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 22:43:01 Reply Private Reply
#8: Tooconservative To: buckeroo, Fred Mertz, sneakypete (#6)
Scruffy is definitely my #2 pick.
Mentioning him reminds me of another recent dearly departed.
Free Fred! : )
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 22:46:28 Reply Private Reply
#9: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#1)
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-05 22:47:29 Reply Private Reply
#10: Tooconservative To: Roscoe (#9)
Around a third of these delegates arrive at the convention unbound.
And Rubio has 170+ delegates he is guarding like an old hen guarding her eggs. But he can unbind them on the first ballot in return for VP/SoS/SoD. But he can't run with Trump, not after all that tiny hands taunting and the rest of the stuff he said about Trump repeatedly.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 22:59:12 Reply Private Reply
#11: SOSO To: ConservingFreedom, TooCpnservative, AKA Stone, vicomte13, All (#0)
SOSO posted on 2016-04-05 23:05:51 Reply Private Reply
#12: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#10)
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-05 23:10:25 Reply Private Reply
#13: Tooconservative To: SOSO, nolu chan (#11)
Cruz seems to have locked up 90%. I don't see how you can say that seriously.
Cruz is also locking up significant numbers of delegate slots with his supporters, people who are bound to vote for Trump on the first (or second) ballot but who will then flock to Cruz.
And Rubio is just waiting with his hoard of 172 delegates. Kasich has 54. And Bush and others have some to toss in too, for their final revenge against The Donald's sneers at them.
If Rubio and Kasich and Bush and others unbind their delegates and Cruz has hundreds of unbound delegates plus about 800 of his own delegates, Cruz could win on the first ballot against Trump, outright.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-05 23:19:34 Reply Private Reply
#14: nolu chan To: TooConservative, SOSO (#13)
90% of what?
Cruz will be mathematically eliminated from any possibility whatever of attaining a 1237 majority after the April 19th primary in New York. Cruz is running in third, has been there for a while, and is over 30 points behind Trump. Cruz can preach, but he can't sell his brand of snake oil in New York.
Cruz is likely to be shut out in the northeast.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-05 23:37:30 Reply Private Reply
#15: Vicomte13 To: TooConservative (#13)
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-04-05 23:49:52 Reply Private Reply
#16: Pericles To: TooConservative, buckeroo (#4)
For me it is Trump or nobody. I could care less if the choice is between anyone else. There is no difference.
Pericles posted on 2016-04-06 00:04:58 Reply Private Reply
#17: Pericles To: TooConservative (#13)
Pericles posted on 2016-04-06 00:08:00 Reply Private Reply
#18: SOSO To: nolu chan, TooConservative (#14)
It will take a lot of opium smoking to see how Cruz has a realistic chance to get 1237 on the first ballot even with the uncommitted and unbound delegates. Both CNN and Fox have been doing the math based on the current polling in the remaining 13 +/- states. There is an odds on bet that Trump will be 45 or so votes short going into the convention with about 150 uncommitted/unbound delegates to be had. Trump's chances look good to get the 45 +/- out of these that he needs. But this has been a very strange campaign year.
Bottom line, IDM who gets the REP nomination as the REP Party is toast in 2016.
SOSO posted on 2016-04-06 00:17:36 Reply Private Reply
#19: SOSO To: Vicomte13, TooConservative (#15)
That is not a realistic assessment.
SOSO posted on 2016-04-06 00:18:40 Reply Private Reply
#20: Roscoe To: Vicomte13 (#15)
Likely so
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 00:34:46 Reply Private Reply
#21: nolu chan To: TooConservative, SOSO (#13)
Rubio has 171. Kasich has 143 (not the 54 you cited).
Still, after NY, it may well be that Trump will have more than Cruz, Rubio, and Kasich combined.
Trump will likely end up with at least something in the neighborhood of 1200.
The GOPe will not unite to nominate Cruz.
The miscellaneous candidates have a grand total of 15 delegates. Carson's 9 is 2 more than the other 4 have.
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/delegate-count-tracker
740 - Trump
514 - Cruz
171 - Rubio
143 - Kasich
9 - Carson
4 - Bush
1 - Fiorina
1 - Huckabee
1 - Paul
23 - Uncommitted
2472 total delegates
1237 needed for majority
888 remaining
Trump needs 497 for a majority.
Cruz/Kasich need 392 to stop Trump. Every delegate that Kasich wins will have Cruz finish that much further behind Trump.
Cruz needs Kasich to stay in and bag some delegates in the northeast. Kasich said so many times that he was beating Hillary in Wisconsin, maybe the Republican voters there thought he was running in the Democratic primary. Tonight, Kasich was non-competitive in every county of Wisconsin. Trump won the most counties. Cruz won the most delegates by far.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-06 00:36:44 Reply Private Reply
#22: nolu chan To: SOSO, TooConservative (#18)
I do not think current polling will have any validity when it becomes mathematically impossible for Cruz to win a majority. Wisconsin appeared good for Kasich but he was shut out in every county.
nolu chan posted on 2016-04-06 00:42:32 Reply Private Reply
#23: SOSO To: nolu chan (#22)
I certainly would not put any money on the predictive accuracy of the polling. Didn't one poll yesterday have Trump 10% up on Cruz in WI?
But again, IDM who the REPs wind up nominating they are toast in Nov.
SOSO posted on 2016-04-06 01:00:51 Reply Private Reply
#24: Logsplitter To: ConservingFreedom (#0)
Logsplitter posted on 2016-04-06 01:38:04 Reply Private Reply
#25: Roscoe To: Logsplitter (#24)
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 02:16:21 Reply Private Reply
#26: sneakypete To: TooConservative (#8)
Free Fred!
sneakypete posted on 2016-04-06 02:34:41 Reply Private Reply
#27: sneakypete To: nolu chan (#14)
That speaks highly for him. The northeast ain't America.
sneakypete posted on 2016-04-06 02:38:14 Reply Private Reply
#28: rlk To: A K A Stone (#1)
We have one president from Kenya, and another wannabe from Canada. You got a problem with that?
It's the trend. Next month we start a reality TV series, "How to move to America, mouth off, and become president"
Outside of his citizenship, I have greater problems with Cruz. He has as great an allegiance to Mexican illegals as Americans. Like supports like. His background suggests Goldman Sacks and company. He is a lying disgrace to himself and to the American people supporting him.
rlk posted on 2016-04-06 04:16:31 Reply Private Reply
#29: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#22)
I don't see where you get that at all. It was always Trump who was expected to do well in WI and who had led in a number of polls until a few weeks ago.
Since you've been doing delegate math, you might check out my new thread on delegate counts. It does have some state-by-state details on the mechanics of awarding GOP delegates.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 08:19:29 Reply Private Reply
#30: Tooconservative To: Pericles (#17)
Showboating for Adelson, to little effect.
Cruz unintentionally did raise the profile for this meeting which would have gone almost unknown in American media if not for Cruz.
Not that that excuses Cruz's grandstanding.
Even so, I can think of dozens of things about Trump that I dislike as much or more than Cruz's behavior at that event.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 09:06:28 Reply Private Reply
#31: Tooconservative To: SOSO (#18)
Pass the hookah, dude.
BTW, Trump is not a witch.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 09:07:58 Reply Private Reply
#32: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#10)
I'll say it again. If Trump walks into Cleveland with the lion's share of delegates and does not walk out with the nomination, there's going to be trouble for the GOP -- no matter who they nominate or how they nominated him.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 09:56:13 Reply Private Reply
#33: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#7)
Didn't I post the YouTube clip of that? Trump simply mentioned Paul Ryan's name and the crowd booed. You need that posted again? How many times will you post that lie?
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 09:59:55 Reply Private Reply
#34: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#32)
And you somehow imagine there wouldn't be big trouble if Trump did get the nomination?
You're not scaring anyone, any more than Roger Stone is with his threats about rioting ("Days of Rage") and publishing the hotel room numbers of anti-Trump delegates (some of whom are bound to vote for Trump on the first ballot but who could dump him on the second or third ballot to defect to Cruz).
We urge you to visit their
hotel and find them.
You really think these threats help your candidate? Or do they make Trump and his supporters more hated by everyone else? Imagine for a moment it was Cruz and his supporters threatening to riot or to bully delegates. Would you want to cave to threats from them? I don't think so.
It's a question of group dynamics. Making threats rarely prevails in relatively homogeneous groups like registered GOP voters.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 10:19:52 Reply Private Reply
#35: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#33)
Doesn't matter. Whether it's Trump or the kinds of supporters he draws, the offensiveness to the average WI GOP voter and to GOP voters in general is already established. You don't get to just wish it away.
There have been some elements at Trump's rallies that almost seem like plants for the Dems or perhaps agitators trying to make Trump look bad. The Bernie crowd would be likely suspects in WI.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 10:24:00 Reply Private Reply
#36: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#35)
Yep. Truth doesn't matter to you.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 10:24:50 Reply Private Reply
#37: Tooconservative To: Roscoe (#36)
Sure, I'm the problem. Not Trump's many ignorant remarks and how he's wasted his time and failed to build up an actual winning campaign organization nationwide (an integral part of every nomination contest in both parties).
Blame me. I alone, here at little LF, have caused this terrible grief to poor maligned Donald.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 10:29:15 Reply Private Reply
#38: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#37)
You overestimate yourself.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 10:30:01 Reply Private Reply
#39: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#35)
The truth doesn't matter or your lies don't matter?
"the offensiveness to the average WI GOP voter"
Think they're offended now? Wait until President Trump removes that 45% protective tariff on foreign motorcycles.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 10:34:12 Reply Private Reply
#40: Roscoe To: misterwhite (#39)
Both.
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 10:36:20 Reply Private Reply
#41: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#34)
Big trouble from who? Racist agitators?
So you're saying we shouldn't vote for Trump because blacks may riot?
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 10:36:52 Reply Private Reply
#42: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#40)
Trump certainly brings out the true colors in people, doesn't he? If nothing else, we now see people for who they really are.
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 10:40:16 Reply Private Reply
#43: Roscoe To: TooConservative (#34)
"That's not a threat. That's a promise." --John Wayne
Roscoe posted on 2016-04-06 10:43:23 Reply Private Reply
#44: misterwhite To: TooConservative (#34)
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 10:44:48 Reply Private Reply
#45: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#39)
Pick one. Like I care. Or anyone else cares about a few posts by anyone here at LF.
You greatly overestimate the impact of a chat room like LF.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 10:57:25 Reply Private Reply
#46: no gnu taxes To: TooConservative (#13)
Trump WILL go into the convention with a plurality of delegates. I don't know if he can get to 1237. Trump is going to have a good week or two coming up. That probably won't continue for Western States after that. The big prize is California, and I have no clue as to how that will go.
But all that being said, I repeat, Trump will have a plurality of the delegates going into the convention. If The RNC relies on formal rules to take this from Trump, he will disrupt the convention. he is rather pissed off at his treatment from the GOP elites anyway.
And this won't be like the Ron Paul nuts demanding they be heard while they are laughed off the premises. If the RNC can't get Trump to play ball, he will essentially destroy the convention.
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-04-06 10:57:33 Reply Private Reply
#47: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#44)
Come off it. Stone is Trump's longest political adviser and buddy, going back decades. Stone admits that he is still in contact with Trump and some elements of his staff on a regular basis. And he seems to be serving as an unofficial spokesman, something he couldn't do without Trump's blessing.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 10:59:15 Reply Private Reply
#48: Tooconservative To: no gnu taxes (#46)
Nothing in the rules suggests or states that anything less than the prescribed 1237 delegates will win the nomination. Nothing.
The nominee is the first guy to get to 1237, no matter what else happens.
If situations were reversed and Cruz had the larger plurality, you'd be arguing the opposite. Because you're for Your Guy and against that Other Guy.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 11:01:53 Reply Private Reply
#49: misterwhite To: Roscoe (#43)
misterwhite posted on 2016-04-06 11:04:25 Reply Private Reply
#50: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#42)
The scales have fallen from your eyes, eh? A regular epiphany.
It's so surprising, given how secretive I have been about opposing Trump. When did I give myself away? Was it when Trump announced his candidacy and I promptly posted NRO's article, Witless Ape Rides Escalator? In retrospect, I may have tipped my hand with that one.
Tooconservative posted on 2016-04-06 11:04:57 Reply Private Reply