Trump did not lose the election

We knew that!

Unfortunately members of the cabal that stole the election from our president AND Americans who cared about the future of this Republc are left with the short end of the stick! This is unfair as President Trump truly won the election by a landslide!

Payday is just around the corner. Go Arizona; get the ball rolling!

… the Constitution's way of voting. No mail ins and IDs presented upon obtaining a Ballot. Also Poll Watchers with teeth! The “Constitution’s way of voting?” The Constitution says nothing about mail in ballots, IDs or poll watchers. You can click here to learn exactly what the US Constitution says about voting.

he Constitution says nothing about mail in ballots, IDs or poll watchers.

It is election day not election months. Get rid of mail in voting.

t is election day not election months. Get rid of mail in voting. I agree with that – FULLY. But that was not what I replied to. IbJensen stated: … the Constitution's way of voting. I pointed out to him that he was all WRONG in his thesis. I stand by my post, when I stated that … … the Constitution says nothing about mail in ballots, IDs or poll watchers. That is correct – RIGHT? Of course, I am …

… the Constitution says nothing about mail in ballots, IDs or poll watchers.

Supremacy Clause:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The reason that states have to obey Federal laws and the Constitution as a whole is specifically because of this clause of the Constitution. That obedience is not optional, conditional, or debatable. If you are part of the United States, you are subject to Federal law and your “feelz” otherwise have no bearing.

If you disagree with Federal law ... if you want to deny rights under the Constitution --- you are out of luck.

You can try to change it in court. You can try to have Congress pass a change to the law or repeal it. You can try to amend the Constitution. But the Federal power in the areas where the Constitution grants lawmaking power to the Federal government over- rides anything the States can do.

This is key to the functioning of a free, constitutional republic. If a state, or group of states, can defy the Federal government at will, there is no Federal government. There is no equal justice under the law. And there is, in fact, no rule of law.

This was recognized from the beginning. In Federalist #44 James Madison pointed out that if it was not included, then each state would have functional veto power over the entire country. Without it, the country would not work. There have been 3 attempts to over-ride or ignore the Supremacy clause and each was aimed at destroying the country.

Read ... The resT --- of This enTry »

https://chicagoboyz.net/archives/author/subotai-bahadur

Laws perTaining To naTional anyThing ... have to be sTandardized --- via The ussc / consiTuTion !

example

including peTs

for census - voTing

… the Constitution says nothing about mail in ballots, IDs or poll watchers.’ Supremacy Clause: The “Supremacy Clause” does not override the Constitution. Under the Constitution, each state appoints presidential electors “in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,” giving state legislatures broad authority to define through state law how that state’s electors should be allocated. https://www.lawfareblog.com/state-laws-may-decide-disputed-2020- election REPEATING: … in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct” …

Their own laws - consTiTution

That was The quesTion

broughT before The ussc

They refused To adjudicaTe iT

love
boris

Are sTaTes naTionally obligaTed To follow Their own laws – constitution Yes, States are – They DEFINITELY are obligated to follow their own laws and the Constitution.

… in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct” …

In regards To

mail in - absenTee balloT

sTaTe consTiTuTion laws

did They

---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you know

The difference

beTween

a mobocracy - republic

love
boris

---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I am witnessing the greatest, freest republic on earth being transformed into a technocracy that resembles communist China, the most oppressive regime on earth.

The coordinated disinformation campaign of ... the Democrat/technocrat/globalist narrative --- is an orchestrated effort to make Americans believe the unbelievable, and accept the unacceptable.

https://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=63184

did They “Did they” what? Do you know The difference between a mobocracy – republic Yes.

“Did they” what?

Break - illegally change sTaTe - federal consTiTuTional laws

CHEAT ( mail in - absenTee eligibiliTy balloT laws )

( only legally changed be amendmenT )

( NoT by whim - fiaT - parTy / public opinion )

* The eligibiliTY - regisTraTion - counTing Too *

May 23, 2020

I am somewhat more pessimistic.

( Sullivan would not have taken this stand in the first place if he did not have the assurance of the Democrats, including their Nomenklatura that something more was up. )

His appointments outside the normal criminal law procedures implies a strong possibility that the Left has decided to split and discredit the entire Judicial branch.

At which point, disputes will depend on which side’s judge has the case regardless of law, precedence, or anything approximating justice.

We have a duly elected President who the Democrats are trying to unconstitutionally overthrow.

We have the Democrats and part of the Republicans joining in the overthrow.

We have the entire electoral system under attack with the validity of votes and voters, the chain of custody of votes, and the counting being placed into question.

In Democrat controlled states, the governments are trying to claim the right to and to factually suppress the Constitution and the Bill of Rights at will. They are doing that in no small part by ignoring judicial rulings against them.

The creation of functionally a separate judicial system subservient to the Democrats leaves not much in the way of peaceful due process to resolve differences.

Der Krieg ist eine bloße Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln.

It might be reasonable to prepare for interesting times.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/05/report-judge-in-michael-flynn- case-hires-a-lawyer-for-the-judge/

Subotai Bahadur

---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

This is someThing The ussc is supposed To decide

duh