On October 26, 2020, SCOTUS Ruled 5-3 That Mail-In & Absentee Ballots Had To Be In Election Officials Hands On November 3

Source: https://amp.jsonline.com/amp/3670662001
Published: Dec 11, 2020
Author: PATRICK MARLEY
Post Date: 2020-12-11 08:56:27 by A K A Stone
Views: 1440

MADISON - The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin's voting laws Monday, rejecting an effort to require the counting of absentee ballots that are sent back to election officials on or just before Election Day.

The court's 5-3 ruling means that absentee ballots will be counted only if they are in the hands of municipal clerks by the time polls close on Nov. 3.

The justices determined the courts shouldn't be the ones to decide the election rules amid the coronavirus pandemic that is surging in Wisconsin and across the world.

"The Constitution provides that state legislatures — not federal judges, not state judges, not state governors, not other state officials — bear primary responsibility for setting election rules," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a concurring opinion.

In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan gave that notion short shrift, noting Wisconsin's Republican-run Legislature hasn't met since April. Extending the deadline for absentee ballots should have been allowed, she wrote.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: nolu chan    To: A K A Stone (#0)

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin's voting laws Monday, rejecting an effort to require the counting of absentee ballots that are sent back to election officials on or just before Election Day.

Note this pertains to Wisconsin state law and applies only to Wisconsin.

In one recent 5-3 ruling, the court blocked a judge's ruling that would have allowed curbside voting in Alabama.

That decision came just days after a 4-4 tie among the justices allowed a decision to stand that allowed ballots in Pennsylvania to be counted even if they arrived after Election Day.

Note that Pennsylvania was allowed to count ballots which arrived after election day.

Each state must comply with the law of that state.

nolu chan posted on 2020-12-11 12:32:16   Reply   Private Reply


#2: BorisY    To: A K A Stone (#0)

To: SeekAndFind

I expect foot-dragging until December 15th, at which time the SC will say the matter is moot.

I suspect more radical solutions are needed.

I hope Trump is ... up to --- the task.

7 posted on 12/11/2020 by HogsBreath

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3914432/posts?q=1&;page=1#7

Amy Coney BarreT

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2020-12-11 12:54:09   Reply   Private Reply