Enjoy

Deckard would probably enjoy too.

I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions. Enjoy I am a news hawk – and you know that. Stone, I sincerely thank you for the heads up – I really do. However, I am a speed reader and therefore I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast. I only watch the first few minutes of these podcasts and if it furnishes no information that I can search the Internet with – then I leave. I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news. If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none. But again, I do thank you for the heads up. And I always read the entire “print” information in the links you post. Keep the links coming …

I will be hesitant to share good information with you in the future.

Willingly ignorant.

This says it all:

Gatlin: I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news.

If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none.

Constant scan for news, huh?

*****

All you can do Gatlin and what you have been doing all along is to side with the liberal Mockingbird media as they and you attempt to undermine the President while he and his legal team are working around the clock to expose this rampant corruption.

Surrendering to the enemy is apparently what you have decided to do here.

Your egotistical bloviating about your military experience pales in relevance to what you have become today...a coward, happily ceding the nation to socialism and refusing to support your Commander in Chief, one whom you so vigorously supported - until this, his investigating and exposing election fraud. Then you turn on him like a rabid dog while raising the white flag of surrender.

Remember these words Tater? These are your words in fact:

I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans.

Not only is he "making an ass of himself", but in your highly esteemed medical opinion, Trump is acting irrationally by pursuing every legal channel to bring this to the light.

Shame on you Sir!

I think you would enjoy his podcast. In this episode he lays out what could be Trumps strategy. Hint it isn't certiification or court cases. It has to do with perceptions. Enjoy Deckard would probably enjoy too. Stone, I tried hard – very hard – to watch the entire 1 hour and 17 minutes of the Scott Adam’s video you wanted me to watch. But as hard as I really tried, I just could not do it. I was however able to watch 22 minutes of an eccentric [he has been described that way] multimillionaire ramble for different points to different points from his magnificent estate [it has been described that way] in Fullerton, California just east of San Francisco. What I heard during the first 22 minutes was Scott Adams rambling for various points to various points, taking his conversation in no specific direction that gave me any idea of what point he was trying to get across. It was after 22 minutes that in desperate sense for reasoning, I finally moved the bar to the last 17 minutes hoping to learn “what I was supposed to learn” in his summary. However, I heard no summary during the last 17 minutes – I only heard more rambling from point to point. I did not see an “effective strategy from Scott Adams that will regain the election that Trump lost to Biden. I wish I had and I hope the strategy I did not see will be effective and we will see Trump remain in the White House. In the meantime, all the video did was make me think of Peter Sellers in the movie Doctor Strangelove. Now, I ask you to please tell me what you learned from Scott Adams’ video. I will definitely listen with a sincere hope to understand. I did a background check on Scott Adams. I do this on each person or for every article I give serious consideration to. This everything I found: Scott Adams https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Adams Blog Review: Scott Adams’ Blog http://evermoreinstructional.com/2016/01/16/blog-review-scott-adams- blog/ How Scott Adams Got Hypnotized by Trump https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-03-22/how-dilbert-s- scott- adams-got-hypnotized-by-trump The creator of Dilbert explains Trump's persuasion style and reminds us why people stopped caring about facts https://www.businessinsider.com/dilbert-creator-scott-adams-explains- trumps-persuasion-style-2017-10 What do you think about Scott Adams Blog's analysis of Trump's language and persuasiveness? https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-about-Scott-Adams-Blogs- analysis-of-Trumps-language-and-persuasiveness No One Understands Donald Trump Like the Horny Narcissist Who Created Dilbert https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/09/dilbert-creator-scott- adams-gets-trump-like-no-one-else.html Unfortunately,I found nothing that qualifies Scott Adams as a political strategist or political campaign manager. Regrettably. Scott Adams is just another person clinging on to desperate hope … Deckard – Did you learn anything from the video that will save the election for Trump?

I will be hesitant to share good information with you in the future. Thank you for that. I find all the information I need anyway. Besides, the information you share with me displays a process by which an individual or group comes to adopt increasingly radical views on political, social, or religious concepts. That, I can do without and it will not be missed.

Willingly ignorant. This says it all: It says nothing at all. It simply shows two words you took out of context. Gatlin: I figure if what is in there is important, then I will discover it anyway in my constant scan for news. If I don’t run across it – I must conclude it was either only opinion, perception or speculation – which I deal with none. That is true. You repeating it does not make it untrue – It even emphasizes and substantiates it more. Constant scan for news, huh? What is the “huh” for – Can you show in any way that I do not? All you can do Gatlin and what you have been doing all along is to side with the liberal Mockingbird media as they and you attempt to undermine the President while he and his legal team are working around the clock to expose this rampant corruption. Bullshit. All I can do is to repeatedly ask to be shown firm evidence of fraud that prevented Trump from being elected. No one can do that. And since no once can, all they have to offer is a barrage of personal attacks of the nature you are undertaking now. Surrendering to the enemy is apparently what you have decided to do here. Asking for facts is “surrendering to the enemy” – How so? Your egotistical bloviating about your military experience … What did you do at Udorn RTAFB and what rank did you hold? … pales in relevance to what you have become today...a coward … I am called “a coward” because I simply ask for proof? That makes no sense. It does however again reinforce my statement that is lieu of proof – all yu can do is launch into a person attack. Which, of course – does nothing … .. happily ceding the nation to socialism .. Oh, such drama. How is me asking for proof “ceding the nation to socialism?” Explain, please … … and refusing to support your Commander in Chief … I support him when he is right – I am however no “blind loyalist” when he is wrong. Are you a “blind loyalist” when he is wrong? If so – Then why? … one whom you so vigorously supported - until this … See my comment above. … his investigating and exposing election fraud … Exactly where has he “exposed election fraud” that will overturn the election? That’s what I have been asking all along. Then you turn on him like a rabid dog while raising the white flag of surrender. Take off your “drama queen dress” and get on to facts. And show me where election fraud cause Trump to lose the election. Remember these words Tater? These are your words in fact: Kp> I will support whatever he rationally decides to do – I will however not support him continuing to make an ass of himself and possibly hurting the Republicans. Not only is he "making an ass of himself", but in your highly esteemed medical opinion, Trump is acting irrationally by pursuing every legal channel to bring this to the light. I remember those words, like I wrote them yesterday – Wait, I did, or was it theday before? Thank you for emphasizing them again – You are a most gracious person. Shame on you Sir! “Shame on me” for what? If insisting that facts be provided to support allegations – then I will proudly wear that cloak. And the award for the best performance in drama on the thread – goes to … DECKARD … … BRAVO – BRAVO – BRAVO …

I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast.

How about 5 minutes of your time? Cued to relevant portion:

I have neither the patience or time to sit and listen to an hour and 17 minutes of pod cast. How about 5 minutes of your time? Cued to relevant portion: Of course, I will gladly spend that time for that. And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins – and explain why you think that it is “relevant.” Right? I’m waiting …

And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins – and explain why you think that it is “relevant.”

Right?

I’m waiting …

Gatlin is a liar. He sent me a pm last night saying he would watchthe video.

Folder: Inbox Date: November 30 8:47:40 PM From: Gatlin To: A K A Stone Subject: Re: LIVE: Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election

As a courtesy to you and because of your polite request – I will set aside time during the night to watch it. I will then comment on the open forum.

But Gatlin didn't watch the video that is why he couldn't make any post about it. He only posted unsubstantiated claims.

Gatlins qualifications are

1. Peeling potatos.

2. Changing bedpans for his wife.

3. Gambling on the stock market.

Not the qualifications of someone to take seriously.

And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins

If you had actually clicked on the video I provided, it would have taken you directly to the portion of the video that I found relevant to the discussion. In other words, it was cued ahead to 5:49.

Since you had to ask, it's obvious that you didn't bother to play the shortened video I posted.

Watch it, don't watch it - I don't care. At least be honest about watching it.

And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins – and explain why you think that it is “relevant.” Right? I’m waiting … I am still waiting for this … Gatlin is a liar. He sent me a pm last night saying he would watchthe video. I did send you that PM last night. How am I a liar? Folder: Inbox Date: November 30 8:47:40 PM From: Gatlin To: A K A Stone Subject: Re: LIVE: Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election As a courtesy to you and because of your polite request – I will set aside time during the night to watch it. I will then comment on the open forum. I attest that to be a truthfully statement. But Gatlin didn't watch the video that is why he couldn't make any post about it. I could watch only a portion of that pathetic person jumping from topic to topic and subsalting nothing – and since it was so ridiculous and was continuing to be, I could no long punish myself. I went through POW training before deploying to SEA. I withstood everything. I saw that was nothing was there and had no indication that anything would be there. Consequently, there was no reason for me to suffer torture by continuing to watch that pathetic video. I then went to the summary – only to find there was no summary. Scott Adams provided no evidence of anything in the Video. DID ANYONE SEE ANY EVIIDENCE? Read the links I provided and you will see others feel the same way as I do. Gatlin is a liar. It was you who lied – Lying by deception is still LYING. You mislead me into believing that I would see evidence in the video. Again, there was none. Again, it was you who lied. He only posted unsubstantiated claims. WHERE? Gatlins qualifications are 1. Peeling potatos. Yes, I am qualified to do that Gatlins qualifications are 2. Changing bedpans for his wife. Yes, I am qualified to do that. Gatlins qualifications are 3. Gambling on the stock market. Yes, I am qualified to do that. And I am fully qualified to challenge you to provide proof that Trump lost the election because of fraud. Yet you are UNQUALLIFIED to do that and continue to make a fool out of yourself by having only personal attacks togall back on in your failure WHY? Tell everyone. Do it now …

And you of course will tell me the exact hour and minute time point this “relevant portion” of which you speak begins If you had actually clicked on the video I provided, it would have taken you directly to the portion of the video that I found relevant to the discussion. In other words, it was cued ahead to 5:49. I thought you were posting the original video again. I apologize [MAKE A NOTE OF THAT]. Okay, I have looked at your video now. And I am just not seeing what you want me to see. I am still seeing a 62-year-old multimillionaire spouting gobbledygook and doing a great impersonation of Peter Sellers in the movie Doctor Strangelove - all the while providing no evidence of anything. So, I ask you to please stop with the personal attacks to tell me – and everyone – exactly what you are seeing that is so all God danged important that we should know.