Stone – You stated emphatically in a post to chastise me that the death rate is declining. Furthermore, you stated that COVID-19 is no worse than the flu. You were wrong – SO VERY WRONG – in both cases. The death rate is proven to be most definitely still “rising” – as the latest reports show. And the mortality rate of COVID-19 is expected to be as high as 4% – while the mortality rate of the flu is less that 0.1%, When you are wrong – as you usually are – you are really WRONG. There is a way for you to stop being so …

Fear Monger! Fear Mongering is defined as: The action of deliberately arousing public fear or alarm about a particular issue. What I am doing is not “fear mongering.” It is an effort to get you and Stone to stop endlessly avoiding or negating reality – always remaining in denial. You both contradict the reality of a situation or struggle to adjust to a circumstance while neglecting its impact. In 1937, Anna Freud expanded upon her father's concept of defense mechanisms in her book, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense, in which she noted that denial may exist in our words, our deeds, or solely in our fantasies. In fantasy, she maintained, we keep the denial to ourselves. In both word and deed, it is shared with the outside world, and thus may not be compatible with the experiences of others in our lives. After all, she noted, people tend to judge the normality or abnormality of denial by the degree of its conspicuousness. And some efforts at denial do seem to be more obvious than others.

You stated emphatically in a post to chastise me that the death rate is declining.

It was.

Now prove this story is correct. Who are the people who died? What are their names? Nevemind you lefties are to stupid to interact with.

Nevemind. Okay ...

Now prove this story is correct. After you prove that wearing a mask is absolutely "ineffective" in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 – as you have so charged. You go first …

… Tell me to wear a mask in person and I will knock your faggoty ass out cold. You didn’t attack the guy in Ace Hardware – you merely THREATENED him. Uh-huh … It’s therefore no surprise that your threatening remarks sound exactly like the antifa as perpetrators of violence. Well – At least you are not “shooting” like Florida man who opened fire in the hotel lobby. The Supreme Court has cited three “reasons why threats of violence are outside the First Amendment”: “protecting individuals from the fear of violence, from the disruption that fear engenders, and from the possibility that the threatened violence will occur.” R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 388 (1992). In Watts v. United States, however, the Court held that only “true” threats are outside the First Amendment. Since it is well recognized that you are a pussy blowhard who blusters and boasts in an obviously unpleasant way at every opportunity – It is easy to understand that you are not serious. You may therefore – rant on …

After you prove that wearing a mask is absolutely "ineffective" in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19

"There Is No Proven Effectiveness" - Netherlands Refuses To Mandate Mask Wearing In Public

After you prove that wearing a mask is absolutely "ineffective" in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19 "There Is No Proven Effectiveness" - Netherlands Refuses To Mandate Mask Wearing In Public Ergo – there is absolutely no proven “ineffectiveness” in the prevention of the spread of COVID-19. … but if you are infected, wearing a mask could stop you from passing the virus to someone else. Exactly !!! This has long been the accepted standard. Thank you …