Another win for the statists who propagandized and want us to fear everything but marauding protesters.
The above thanks to Martin Hill who also notes:
Does this priest not even know, since he adheres to this mask hysteria, that his touching , rubbing & smearing his hands all over his mask, according to the CDC mask guidelines, he has completely contaminated both his hands and the mask. He now, according to protocol which he claims to believe in, must discard the mask entirely, & wash his hands with soap and water.Here's just a few facts about masks, straight from the CDC & NEJM.I'm not making this up, you can download the PDF filed on the CDC website. That's the most insane thing about all this. They are so dumbed down that they don't read the actual medical studies or CDC manuals that outline all of this protocol very clearly, even with illustrated pictures that a 2nd-grader could understand.
A brand new New England Journal of Medicine article points out:The World Health Organization just wrote on June 8:"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Focusing on universal masking alone may, paradoxically, lead to more transmission of Covid-19 if it diverts attention from implementing more fundamental infection-control measures...The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic... fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial mask, particularly in light of the worldwide mask shortage, but it is difficult to get clinicians to hear this message in the heat of the current crisis."
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
"the widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high quality or direct scientific evidence and there are potential benefits and harms to consider (see below)...the use of a mask alone is insufficient to provide an adequate level of protection".https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332293/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.4-eng.pdf https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks
Please note: Although the priest is operating from church property and as a representative of the church can on PPS or libertarian grounds ask anyone to leave the property, it is still appropriate to object to the action---especially in this case when it promotes the desire of the state to instill fear and obedience.
In short, there is nothing wrong with pointing out that Father Thomas has become a useful idiot of the statists.
#1: Gatlin To: Deckard, All (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2020-06-20 16:45:42 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: Gatlin (#1)
OK...so if I don't wear a mask, even though The New England Journal of Medicine, 4/1/20 says this:
"We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Focusing on universal masking alone may, paradoxically, lead to more transmission of Covid-19 if it diverts attention from implementing more fundamental infection-control measures...The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic... fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial mask, particularly in light of the worldwide mask shortage, but it is difficult to get clinicians to hear this message in the heat of the current crisis."
I am somehow supporting antifa, or as you put it: promoting the desire of the anti-governments and antifa
Seems to me that antifa and their ilk are all wearing face masks.
The point is you are still a submissive slave, unable to think for himself and whose desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic...
Fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial mask
Oh, and you're a complete idiot for trying to equate non-mask wearers with antifa supporters if not actual terrorists.
I guess all the lock-down protesters were antifa as well? How about the thousands who will NOT be wearing masks in Tulsa for Trump's speech.
Trump rally attendees dont have to wear masks despite COVID risk, court rules
How you gonna wrap your feeble mind around that one Tater?
Are all of the people at the rally supporting antifa by NOT wearing masks?
Deckard posted on 2020-06-20 17:15:40 Reply Private Reply
#3: Gatlin To: Deckard, All (#2)
Gatlin posted on 2020-06-21 05:40:51 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: Gatlin (#3)
I have never supported antifa you lying sack of shit. Check out all the anti-antifa articles I have posted since this shit went down. Not a single fucking one is pro Floyd, pro BLM or pro antifa.
Now answer the question; All those non masked supporers at the Trump Rally - all antifa supporters because they didn't wear masks, right? That's your fucking logic. If you don't wear a submission mask you're a terrorist.
How fucking stupid can you be?
Since they perform illegal actions, you should ask yourself if what they stand for is something you really want to continue to support and a associate yourself with their cause.
There you go again, lying your sorry ass off.
You can't help yourself, you're a congenital liar.
Stop promoting the cop-haters, anti-government movements and antifa that use violence to achieve their goals.
Yeah I'm promoting that crap by what, not wearing a mask?
All the Trumpkins at the rally are antifa. Trumps is antifa. At least according to your twisted logic.
Grow a fucking brain!
Deckard posted on 2020-06-21 10:17:28 Reply Private Reply
#5: Gatlin To: Deckard, All (#4)
Gatlin posted on 2020-06-21 10:33:35 Reply Private Reply
#6: Deckard To: Gatlin (#5)
Deckard posted on 2020-06-21 16:37:51 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Deckard, All (#6)
Gatlin posted on 2020-06-22 05:31:35 Reply Private Reply
#8: IbJensen To: Deckard (#0)
IbJensen posted on 2020-06-22 14:10:43 Reply Private Reply
#9: IbJensen To: Deckard (#0)
IbJensen posted on 2020-06-22 14:13:27 Reply Private Reply
#10: Deckard To: IbJensen, Gatlin (#8)
He was just doing his job, obeying the State. According to the Tom Parsons on this thread, the man is a heretic who has rebelled against the established dogma by refusing to wear the mask of obedience and submission.
Isn't that right Gatlin? Heck, according to you, "it was inappropriate for the author to use this situation to promote the desire of the anti-governments and antifa", so obviously this non-conformist is aligned with the antifa crowd by not wearing a mask..
Some may have ignored this interesting tidbit:
Does this priest not even know, since he adheres to this mask hysteria, that his touching , rubbing & smearing his hands all over his mask, according to the CDC mask guidelines, he has completely contaminated both his hands and the mask. He now, according to protocol which he claims to believe in, must discard the mask entirely, & wash his hands with soap and water.
So the priest calls the cops on someone else's "sin", yet ignores his own equally egregious "sin"?
How typically Papist!
Deckard posted on 2020-06-22 15:00:02 Reply Private Reply
#11: Deckard To: Gatlin (#2)
Joe Biden: I Would Do Everything Possible to Make It Required that People Had to Wear Masks in Public
Deckard posted on 2020-06-26 15:44:06 Reply Private Reply