Yes Sir, that is duly noted as being correct = You got that right.

But as an intelligent and logical person, you should take in mind the complex role of the Supreme Court in our system of government.

When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.

So, when the government issues an order that has not been heretofore deemed unconstitutional, that that order is legal until such time SCOTUS may declared it unconstitutional.

Has SCOTUS declared any of these closure laws unconstitutional?

Let me know if you find they have …

Yep, that is what “Ole Sam” wrote.

You got that right too.

But you got all of this completely wrong …

A weakness can be a strength. When I find that I may have stepped into weaknesses – I know It is then that God can make His power, sovereignty, and love known even more. It has been said that: True strength is the presence of weakness and the acknowledgement of God.

What do you do when you find that you have stepped into weakness?

I must say that there’s little more frustrating than somebody challenging you prove yourself to him. It always feels uncomfortable and icky when someone does this . So, when I prove myself – Then what? You will either dismiss my proof or say that’s not a good enough proof for you. In whatever I say or do, you will forever inherently feel you have asserted your superiority.

That is simply a malicious charge. I spent 24 years on active military duty serving in 12 ranks as both an enlisted man and a commissioned officer in order to insure you have the continuing freedom to be here today to make this malicious charge.

It is with deeply felt courtesy that I now ask of you – What duty have you performed in the service of our great nation to protect and defend the constitution?

I humbly await your answer …

And to whom will you turn in your hour of need when you desperately feel need protection?

Yes, most definitely – We all should. You got that part right.

How, pray tell, that if I were indeed to have a “wimpish attitude” – exactly how can any “wimpish attitude” willfully destroy our constitution?

Again, I await your most intelligently expressed answer …

“Sez” who – You?

Your personal opinion – bluntly speaking – really doesn’t mean shit to me.

And that is what you are stating, only your personal opinion.

Cite case law to back up your biased personal opinion and I will gladly and humbly agree with you.

Can you?

Oh dear God, man – Have you gone completely bonkers with expressing that premise?

Oh – “Never mind” …

That is correct. I believe we have already agreed on this.

The question you ever so blindly continue to overlook is: Who gets to decide if the “law” is “constitutional” and that it must be obeyed.

Ahem – I will go ahead and answer that question for you.

It is SCOTUS.

I am not afraid to come out and kick your ass each time you make these irrational statements.

You really need to do some learning. In doing so, you will find that learning is a simple process of acquiring new, or modifying existing, knowledge, behaviors, skills, values, or preferences.

Try it – you may just like it …

I do have a question to add to the conversation.

Riddle me this - with you as an exalted constitutional expert who ever so proudly continues to believe he has expertise in the constitution's text:

If these closure directives are so unconstitutional as you claim them to be, then why isn’t Deckard’s beloved “Oath Keepers” called to artms and out there “flamboyantly having at it?”

Huh?

Has anyone heard from them?

More importantly does bravery give you the courageouse behavior and sense of character to go to church today and sit shoulder to shoulder with all those people in the pew, to shake hands with most and hug many while touching the collection plate as it is passed?

Do you have such “bravery” …

I am still waiting for this previously posted question to you.

And I fully realize that I shall probably never get one …

From your link:

It is truly amazing, Stone – What shit you can continue to step in.

Relaying their solicitation for money.

Are you donating?

We will probably never know what GI thinks.

But I will gladly tell you what I think.

I think you pissed him off so much for reasons he stated, that we shall never hear from him again.

He did tell me by email that he doesn’t even lurk here.

Great job Stone –

You have a knack for doing that to your posters.

Which should come as no surprise to anyone ..

That was only a part of it.

Uh …

Refresh me on what you have said many times about “queers.”

Or need I go look it up – Should I desire to really post it here.

Your opinion – Which of course you have a right to submit.

As I also have a right to consider it and reject it as an unfounded opinion.

Ahem:

Is the US Air Force unconstitutional since it DEFINITELY is not mentioned in the consgtitution?

According to the way you look at things, what are we to just see those as?

Unconstitutional – Huh?

You presume a lot of things about the Constitution. Some are true, some are not.

I am going to list some things and you tell me if they are in the constitution or not:

Congressional Districts
The Electoral College
Executive Order
Executive Privilege
Freedom of Expression
(Absolute) Freedom of Speech and Press
God
Immigration
Impeachment means removal from office
Innocent until proven guilty
It's a free country
Judicial Review
Jury of Peers
"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"
Marriage
Martial Law
No taxation without representation
Number of Justices in the Supreme Court
"Of the people, by the people, for the people"
Paper Money
Political Parties
Primary Elections
Qualifications for Judges
The right to privacy
The right to travel
The right to vote
The separation of church and state
The Separation of Powers Clause
Slavery

So, if none of these are mentioned in the constitution – and they definitely are not – Then are they all unconstitutional?

I will be most interested to learn of your answer.