I feel safer.

Someone correct me if I am wrong,but if this were thee and me doing it,wouldn't it be identified as Armed Robbery?

Someone correct me if I am wrong,but if this were thee and me doing it,wouldn't it be identified as Armed Robbery?

I would need to know more than what I read in an article in The Free Thought Project and written by Matt Agorist before I could possibly comment on your request.

Why?

One reason ...

Facebook nukes Fake News page "The Free Thought Project"

There are other such damning reports …

While I have absolutely no basis to correct you since I don’t have access to the facts, I will however politely say that I will forever need to fact-check what I read that is presented by TFTP - and especially those articles written by Matt Agorist.

I would need to know more than what I read in an article in The Free Thought Project

Try the link in the article: "Advocacy for LEOs Blog"

The comments on the blog are from people who live in the neighborhood...very enlightening.

Oh, yes, Gatlin, one more thing...try to stop whining...it's unbecoming to a gentleman of your age. Thanks in advance.

Blue Lives Matter Link

The comments there might just enlighten you.

Facebook nukes Fake News page "The Free Thought Project"

Thanks for reminding us all that you favor censorship of ideas, opinions and websites that you find disagreeable.

Thank you for providing me the platform and transition methodology for me to say that my back-story research has shown that some of the web publications publish unverifiable information that is mostly never supported by evidence. Because of this, I have deemed these sources to be untrustworthy for credibly verifiable information.

I got tired of having to fact-check almost every sentence in those web publications that supply unverifiable information, so it has become common practice for me to now look at “source” and “author” of any newly posted article and pass it by if I have found many cases in the past where they only present agenda driven biased stories by rewriting local news story to comply with their point of view.

I have never stated anything about censorship. That is not within my purview – and neither do I ever want it to be. What I have done is to continually advocate for and recommend the fact-checking and further investigation on an each article basis when obtaining information from any of these sources before anyone makes a crusading dedicated effort to promote unverifiable information in the articles from these untrustworthy sources.

I will continue to do that …

Gatlin: I would need to know more than what I read in an article in The Free Thought Project

Watchman: Try the link in the article: "Advocacy for LEOs Blog"

I went to the link in the article Advocacy for LEOs Blog as you suggested. Unfortunately, I found nothing therein to state if the tows were unlawful and therefore illegally conducted. Neither did I find a reason for the tows stated in the source you directed me to. I will mention here that I previously found in another article that the reason for the tows were that various home owners living on the residential street where the big rigs were parked called in complaints to the NYPD that the big rigs were blocking their driveways – and those complaints from the home owners that the big rigs were blocking their driveways was the reason for the tows. It was not a capricious decision given to a sudden or unaccountable change in the behavioral mood pf NYPD’s 66 Precinct Deputy Inspector James King.

The comments on the blog are from people who live in the neighborhood...very enlightening.

The first comment in the blog was from Rabbi Freilich – whom we can probably assume is a resident of the neighbor because it is a Jewish neighborhood and it definitely appears that he knows and is satisfied with the performance of NYPD’s 66 Precinct Deputy Inspector James King – his comment is directed to the author of this article and states:

You should all be ashamed of urself, if ur not happy with something, file ur grievances at the Pct, but to go around and belittle one the best commanders the 66 ever had is disgusting, do u believe he went there for fun? The residents complained, he’s only doing his job,

I read the next ten or so comments after his comment nd they did nothing to factually state anything that I could find about the tows. All I saw were personal attacks on the Rabbi. Did I miss something that you deemed “very enlightening” to explain why the big rigs were towed and if it was lawful. Please let me know.

Until I receive such enlightened information, I will stand by my statement:

I would need to know more than what I read in an article in The Free Thought Project and written by Matt Agorist before I could possibly comment on [sneakypete's] request.

Moving on …

Oh, yes, Gatlin, one more thing...try to stop whining...it's unbecoming to a gentleman of your age. Thanks in advance.

There is a distinct difference between complaining and whining which can easily be distinguished by the nature of the expressed dissatisfaction and by the motivation for expressing it. Complaining is said to involve voicing fair and legitimate dissatisfactions with the goal of achieving a corrective remedy – which is a good thing. My goal is to MLFGA. I voice the dissatisfactions that I feel are legitimate and I do so to attain a resolution. I will continue to do that ...

I say it is complaining and as I so aptly stated in a previous post that complaining has a constructive good.

While you say it is whining.

Oh yes – In any case, I will take your request under careful advisement and get back to you at some future date …

I would need to know more than what I read in an article in The Free Thought Project

I am learning more …

Matt Agorist in The Free Thought Project article posted here stated that “truck drivers are tirelessly carrying tons of supplies” and in these trucks:

The supplies range from food to medical supplies that are invaluable during these times.

While Ashley in an article published in CDL Life stated:

A New York City Police Department precinct towed trucks from a residential roadway while the drivers waiting for a load.

So …

Matt Agorist stated the trucks were full and delivering “supplies that range from food to medical supplies.”

While Ashley stated that the trucks were “empty and waiting for a load.”

We are to believe whom …

Knowing Matt Agorist’s posting history of yellow journalism that has over time presented little or no legitimate well-researched news while instead simply taking stories from other sources and rewriting them to use eye-catching exaggerations and scandal-monger with sensationalism to show a situation in an agenda driven bad light – I chose to believe Ashley.

You may believe whomever you wish to …

Matt Agorist stated the trucks were full and delivering “supplies that range from food to medical supplies.”

While Ashley stated that the trucks were “empty and waiting for a load.”

We are to believe whom …

Not at the same time, you silly. They do drive and do sleep, but hopefully not at the same time.

Gatlin: Matt Agorist stated the trucks were full and delivering “supplies that range from food to medical supplies.” While Ashley reported that the trucks were “empty and waiting for a load.”

A Pole: Not at the same time, you silly. They do drive and do sleep, but hopefully not at the same time.

Of course, you silly, and carrying your masterful thought process further and doing so without overlooking complexity – that begs the question: Were the trucks filled with “supplies ranging from food to medical supplies that are invaluable during these times” as Matt Agorist said. or were “the trucks empty waiting for loads” as Ashley said. But definitely they “cannot be both at the same time” – an oddity that you have so dialectically exposed.

Smart ass, you tell us all which. Was the “glass half full or was the glass half empty” – using an age old analogy. Call upon the high degree of sapience you seem to think you are displaying and use your divine knowledge coupled with the abundance of wisdom you have indulging in to act with mythical ability and riddle us which it was.

Can you …

Remembering of course, as you have digressed and wandered off into the wilderness – that the issue here is not whether the trucks were filled or empty, but that it has been stated that the residents called NYPD because the trucks were blocking their driveways.

Suddenly, toying with you and Herr Wächter has become more entertaining than ridiculing Deckard with the truth.

Thank you for this glorious early morning opportunity …

Matt Agorist

Nah nevermind. Not reading the article. Matt lies too much.

Nah nevermind. Not reading the article. Matt lies too much.

Virtually all of Matt's articles are backed up by other websites and media outlets.

AllIn Eufaula, Alabama, the police department announced they wanted to help the hungry truck drivers, AL.com reported.

“To that end, if you are a truck driver, and need to take time off the road in Eufaula, we will assist you in getting food,” the Eufaula Police Department posted on their official Facebook page.

Aucoin told KRNV that people have been kind of enough to bring her a warm meal when she and her daughter post-up at truck stops across the country.

Also, retired NYPD Detective David Chianese captured the tweet and then took to his Advocacy for LEOs Blog to sarcastically flog the “brave” cops for raiding sleeping truckers.

Even the pro-police media outlet Blue Lives Matter decried the actions of NYPD’s 66 Precinct in an article on Tuesday. Blue Lives Matter described what happened in the 66th Precinct as “utterly disgusting.”

There's FIVE links right there!

Stone: Nah nevermind. Not reading the article. Matt lies too much.

Deckard:Virtually all of Matt's articles are backed up by other websites and media outlets.

Nah, Deckard – You lie.

To your first pint – Those “other websites” you refer to are biased websites with the same agenda as Matt Agorist.

As to the “other media outlets” you refer to – What Matt Argoist does is take articles from other media outlets and without any investigation he rewrites those articles and files it with his lies to prejudice those who read his article to believe it to be true and not investigate and read those “other media articles.”

AllIn Eufaula, Alabama …

Aucoin told KRNV

Shrewd tactic – Very shrewd …

Matt Agorist sprinkles his articles with a bit of sympathetic truth to sway the readers into believing all the information contained within his articles is true.

He is one conning and deceptive individual who has shown skill in achieving his ends by deceit and evasion.

You have learned your lessons well from Matt Agorist.

You are displaying that right now …

Matt probably wants to do good and expose corruption. I just wonder why he has to exaggerate things regularly. Like calling arrests kidnappings etc.

Matt probably wants to do good and expose corruption.
I just wonder why he has to exaggerate things regularly.
Like calling arrests kidnappings etc.

I can only wonder what Matt Agorist's intentions really are.
Moreover …
I really wonder why he must consistently lie and exaggerate.

Those “other websites” you refer to are biased websites with the same agenda as Matt Agorist.

Advocacy for LEOs Blog?

Blue Lives Matter?

Eufaula Police Department Facebook Page?

Alabama.com?

KNRV News 4?

All of these sites have the same agenda as FTP?

Seriously?

As to the “other media outlets” you refer to – What Matt Argoist does is take articles from other media outlets

If anything, he may be guilty of editorializing.

There's FIVE links right there!

Five links of truths to support a deceptive article –
Does not one lie by Matt Agorist cancel ...

Five links of truths to support a deceptive article – Does not one lie by Matt Agorist cancel ...

Of course, the links support Matt's article.

Advocacy for LEOs Blog?

Blue Lives Matter?

Eufaula Police Department Facebook Page?

Alabama.com?

KNRV News 4?

All of these sites have the same agenda as FTP?

Seriously?

You're a frigging joke!

f anything, he may be guilty of editorializing.

Bullshit …

Editorializing is the means of inserting your own opinion – there should be no personal opinion by the author in a news article.

When editorializing does happen, a writer is either consciously or unconsciously expressing doubt, censure, praise or injecting lies into a news story.

It is not to be that persons are permitted to express an opinion in a straight news story they are writing.

When the author states an opinion by any person in the article – the quoted must definitely be attributed to the person who gave it.

News stories should always be written in the third person.

The writer’s personal opinions is never to be injected into a news story.

Facts should be reported as they are found, without personal pronouns.

Working in the news media – You should know this.

Why don’t you …

Tell me how the two pro cop sites went over to "the dark side" by posting such (as you call it) anti-cop propaganda?

As far as your "straight from the AP style guide" gibberish - well, you know where you can stick that.

It's a stone-cold gas watching you attempt to reconcile the fact that two-pro cop sites are in agreement with FTP.

Gosh, that must really chap your ass!

Five links of truths to support a deceptive article – Does not one lie by Matt Agorist cancel ...

The five links of truth did not in any way pertain to the NYPD which Matt Argoist was writing about.

They were simply inserted into the article by Matt Agorist merely to present some undeniable truths which Matt Agorist used to support his lie.

I advocate for no one

You ask: “Seriously?”

I answer: Yes.

You say: “You're a frigging joke!”

I say: I am your worst nightmare constantly hounding you to stop posting and supporting lie.

I will continue to do that …

Tell me how the two pro cop sites went over to "the dark side" by posting such (as you call it) anti-cop propaganda?

If you are referring to the two I read – I can say that they were responding to the tweet sent out by the precinct commander which was later removed. The tweet was in bad taste – I agree with the “two dark side” sites on that.

As far as your "straight from the AP style guide" gibberish - well, you know where you can stick that.

Since you mentioned it – Up your ass wrapped in barbed wire sounds good …

It's a stone-cold gas watching you attempt to reconcile the fact that two-pro cop sites are in agreement with FTP.
Gosh, that must really chap your ass!

Nope it did not. I agreed with them.

The precinct commander should have never been so stupid as to issue the dumb tweet. If questioned, he should have issued a press release and stated that he was responding to complaints by the home owners in the residential area that the big rigs were blocking their driveway.

Gosh, yu must be really disappointed that you did not get the response you expected …

The five links of truth did not in any way pertain to the NYPD which Matt Argoist was writing about.

Good grief! These two did:

The tweet has since been deleted after they received a massive wave of backlash. The act of extorting truckers hauling much need supplies was so over the top that it even drew criticism from other cops.

Even the pro-police media outlet Blue Lives Matter decried the actions of NYPD’s 66 Precinct in an article on Tuesday. Blue Lives Matter described what happened in the 66th Precinct as “utterly disgusting.”

Also, retired NYPD Detective David Chianese captured the tweet and then took to his Advocacy for LEOs Blog to sarcastically flog the “brave” cops for raiding sleeping truckers.

In Gatlin Bizarro World, the cops are telling the truth, yet Agorist is a liar for linking to the truthful pro-cop pages.

Geesh!

Suddenly, toying with you and Herr Wächter has become more entertaining than ridiculing Deckard with the truth.

Calm down, ya twink !

Take a chill pill.

Judging from the various articles I read and when sorting through the contradicting information, what I see happened here was that the home owners NYC called in a complaint to the NYPD that big rigs were blocking their driveways in their residential area. Precinct 66 reacted and towed the vehicles in response to those complaints.

The complaints must have been lawfully valid for the NYPD to take that action. Then the stupid precinct commanded issued one of the most dumbass tweets I have ever read from any LEO. Two pro-cop web sites condemned the tweets and make comments about the tweet. There was no mention in the tweet that he was responding to the home owners complaint and the wording in his stupid tweet made it appear this was some glorified quasi tow operation. I can find no evidence to show that the pro-cop websites knew that.

An anti-cop website picked up on the local information and the original story from the first anti-cop website reverberated through all the other anti-cop websites with each site flavoring it with their own brand of bias. That is the reason Deckard said something like “others are preseting the same information.” Yes, they were parroting. None of these “dark-side” websites took the occasion to link to any media source that presented conflicting information which supported the tow operation. Instead, Matt Agorist linked to some websites far away frp, MUC and in Alabama where folks were doing yoeman’s work to assist long=haul truckers. That information had absolutely nothing to do with the op[eration in NYC. It was merely a “move” to gain “sympathetic support” ny Matt Agorist for his cop-condemning article. It is obvious that it work, judging from the response by a poster here.

And Deckard once again operated as a pimp for Matt Agorist by posting this article here …

Shameful …

An anti-cop website picked up on the local information and the original story from the first anti-cop website reverberated through all the other anti-cop websites with each site flavoring it with their own brand of bias.

Show me one link in the article that is anti-cop.

So...more than one site reported it? Good - Freedom of the press is one of the bedrock principles that real Americans hold dear.

You don't like alternative news sites?

Stick with your WSJ.

In Gatlin Bizarro World, the cops are telling the truth …

have agreed that the cops should have condemned the precinct commander for his tweet.

… yet Agorist is a liar for linking to the truthful pro-cop pages.

Matt Agorist is no liar “for linking to the truthful pro-cop pages.”

Matt Aorist is a liar for reasons unknown.

He has been proven to be on numerous occasions here of LF.

Putting aside the stupid tweet by the precinct commander which I have condemned – There are questions that need to be answered before passing judgment and condemning the NYPD.

1) Were there complaints by home owners that the big rigs were blocking their drive ways?

2) Did the NYPD follow proper departmental procedures when responding to the compalints?

3) Did the NYPD find the big rigs were indeed blocking the drive ways and in violation to NYC ordinances?

4) Is this a recurring problem for the home owners because of their proximity to a warehouse?

5) Were there “No Trucks Allowed” of the type we see in many residential areas?

6) is it a requirement by a city ordinance or by NYPD departmental procedures that a “must tow” prevision in required when answer this complaint.

When and if I can find answers to any or most of those question and the answers point to wrong doing by the NYPD – I will gladly join your crusade to crucify the NYPD for their actions here.

In the meantime, I reserve the right to condemn or assign blame.

I will not now, nor will I ever, read an article by Matt Agorist and pass judgment.

You can, you are and you will continue to do so …

Show me one link in the article that is anti-cop.

LMAO ...

The whole damned article is ...

It does however contain supporting facts to support that ...

So...more than one site reported it? Good …

Vermin do are know to be prolific – producing many offspring.

… Freedom of the press is one of the bedrock principles that real Americans hold dear.

Gratuitous comment – of no relevancy.

You don't like alternative news sites?

Not when they present lies masquerading as the truth …

Stick with your WSJ.

I will stick with any media that has verifiable truth.

That’s indeed something you should try doing …

present lies masquerading at the truth …

While I have absolutely no basis to correct you since I don’t have access to the facts, I will however politely say that I will forever need to fact-check what I read that is presented by TFTP - and especially those articles written by Matt Agorist.

Fair enough.

Let us know what you find and decide,ok?

Matt Agorist stated the trucks were full and delivering “supplies that range from food to medical supplies.”

While Ashley stated that the trucks were “empty and waiting for a load.”

We are to believe whom …

What practical difference does it make. A truck waiting to be loaded being towed means it doesn't get loaded,and it doesn't get to deliver a load.

The end result is the same.

What practical difference does it make.

He thinks that the way to win an argument is by quibbling and twisting. Does not know any better.

He thinks that the way to win an argument is by quibbling and twisting.

Does not know any better.

I know this better.

I know that an argument is defined as: “A course of reasoning aimed at demonstrating truth or falsehood."

In the study of logic and philosophy, you will find that an argument is neither a “win” or “lose” situation.

It is simply a series of profoundly complex statements called premises which are intended to determine the degree of truth of another statement.

Understanding this – then all I do, and all I have ever done, is continue to strive to superbly determine the truth.

I am doing a great job at that – I will forever continue to do that …

all I do, and all I have ever done, is continue to strive to superbly determine the truth.

I am doing a great job at that – I will forever continue to do that ...

For ever and ever ;)

There was a time I used to say that a person should never
be afraid to shout out his good features and talents.
My mystical motto back then was "If you've got it, flaunt it!"
You have provided me the golden opportunity to once again shout –
“Brother – I got it, so I’m really gonna flaunt it!"
Thanks for providing me with the platform and reason.
Another idiom I favored for its blunt message of confidence is –
“if you don't toot your own horn - nobody will.”
Pay close attention now …

Pretty good – Eh …
Toot – Toot.
“Major Gatlin” …
That is not an honorary title.
It was well earned through a deliberate and obstinate desire
to be of great service to our wonderful nation..
Toot – Toot.

I am doing a great job at that – I will forever continue to do that …

Truly,you are a legendary something.