Deckard, for Christ's sake – a colloquial used to express contempt, outrage, disgust and frustration – go ahead and show what this is all about.

Don’t just drop a “SCARE BOMB” with only a miniscule of information as your strategy – which is obviously intended to manipulate public opinion about this particular issue by arousing fear or alarm.

At a time life this – and especially at a time like this – what everyone needs are facts, not scare tactics through the use of posting ONLY partial information.

The author in your source has:

One thought on “Coronavirus Patent.”

When he asks:

Why the hell would you want a patent anyway? So you create sickness, then manufacture vaccines? Then you protect everything with a fkg patent? These people are stupid crazy…

In that regard and with respect for truth through full disclosure – the following information and reference source is presented which shows the patent DID NOT create the sickness. The sickness was already created and identified in Hong Kong, China and a growing number of countries around the world in 2003. It was “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus – an outbreak of a virulent respiratory virus.

Yes, the purpose of this patent was to manufacture vaccines – and not to “create sickness.”

This invention related to nucleic acids and proteins from the SARS coronavirus. These nucleic acids and proteins can be used in the preparation and manufacture of vaccine formulations, diagnostic reagents, kits, etc. The invention also provides methods for treating SARS by administering small molecule antiviral compounds, as well as methods of identifying potent small molecules for the treatment of SARS.

US PATENT & TRADMARK OFFICE – PATENT FULL TEXT AND IMAGE DATABASE
United States Patent Application 20060257852
Kind Code A1
Rappuoli; Rino ; et al. November 16, 2006

[…] Accurately detailed information continues: CLICK HERE.

Coronaviruses are named for the crown-like spikes on their surface. Human coronaviruses were first identified in the mid-1960s. They are closely monitored by public health officials.

Deckard, you once said here: My agenda is the truth.

We can see continued evidence in your postings this is not true.

Social Media Posts Spread Bogus Coronavirus Conspiracy Theory -

the purpose of this patent was to manufacture vaccines

No, patents are something else.

"A patent is the granting of a property right by a sovereign authority to an inventor. This grant provides the inventor exclusive rights to the patented process, design, or invention for a designated period"

Gatlin: … the purpose of this patent was to manufacture vaccines.

A Pole: No, patents are something else.
"A patent is the granting of a property right by a sovereign authority to an inventor. This grant provides the inventor exclusive rights to the patented process, design, or invention for a designated period"

Oh – It appears that you have obviously read the entire application filed on 2004-04-12 by the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (Department of Health and Human Services) for US Patent No: US 7,220,852 B1.

Therefore –Will you please quote me the exact wording therein where it was stated that the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (Department of Health and Human Services) – the applicant was the “inventor” and was granted the exclusive “property right” to a new human coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and had the sole “proprietary right” to “legally own” coronavirus (SARS-CoV).

I will be extremely interested in reading that most enlightening documented information furnished by you.

And BTW – Please remember that I ONLY stated “the PURPOSE of this patent was to manufacture vaccines.”

Consequently – since you said “no” to my statement – will you therefore please tell me what then was the exact “purpose” of the “newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)”?

I will be deeply grateful to you for supplying me this factual information …

Please remember that I ONLY stated “the PURPOSE of this patent was to manufacture vaccines.” "I will be deeply grateful to you for supplying me this factual information … "

There two parts to the knowledge - first, facts or information, the second is understanding.

The only purpose of patents is to prevent competition from using the patented method and the motive is pecuniary. There is one exception - if you patent something for public domain. Then the objective is to secure right of use for everyone.

There two parts to the knowledge - first, facts or information, the second is understanding.

I would prefer to say that knowledge is facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject – but I have no disagreement with your statement.

The only purpose of patents is to prevent competition from using the patented method and the motive is pecuniary. There is one exception - if you patent something for public domain. Then the objective is to secure right of use for everyone.

Okay – While you said “no” to my statement and since It appears that you have obviously read the entire application filed on 2004-04-12 by the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (Department of Health and Human Services) for US Patent No: US 7,220,852 B1, I again ask –

– Will you therefore please tell me what then was the exact “purpose” of the “newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)”? the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists.

Edit:
What is your “practical understanding” of the purpose for this US Patent No: US 7,220,852 B1?
Purpose is defined as – “the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists.”

"Will you therefore please tell me what then was the exact “purpose” of the “newly isolated human coronavirus (SARS-CoV)"

The same purpose that the bubonic plague (Black Death) in XIV century had. Punishment for our sins?

… the US Centers of Disease Control and Prevention
(Department of Health and Human Services) got the
US Patent No: US 7,220,852 B1 to “punish us for our sins.”

How extremely surprising or astonishingly amazing …

I have been thinking about this …

If you feel, as you do, that you are onto something –
then what do you think those who are suffering and
will be dying from this terrible virus do to atone for
the sins which they are being punished for?

Tell us – Please …

to atone for the sins ... Tell us – Please …

A serious question deserves a serious answer.

OK, God may reveal it to you if you do the following; read with attention, preferably aloud, Psalm 1 and Psalm 50. You need to read them both in this order 1 and 50.

Before '”fake news”
came “false prophecy.”
Is it now returning …

Our discussion here has become mute because while an
application for Patent No: US 7,220,852 B1 was filed – the patent
however expired.

So, Deckard, this begs the question: Why did you think such a
news story with obsolete information was of the utmost Importance
so that you had to post it here?

The author of this article should have known this – or either he
Knew it and still presented the bogus information to create dissent.
I suspect the latter …

And you Deckard, libertarian asshole, you need to check the
Validity of the information you post and stop spreading shit.

And you Deckard, libertarian asshole

Vulgar insults represent the peak of your intellectual abilities?

Vulgar insults represent the peak of your intellectual abilities?

Then why do you pay attention to them
and feel it necessary to make a comment?

If they bother you that much - try BOZO.

The author of this article should have known this – or either he Knew it and still presented the bogus information to create dissent.

I posted an image with no editorial comment of my own

The document appears genuine.

As far as creating dissent - good thing we have self-righteous little State toadies like you to quash any of that.

If they bother you that much - try BOZO.

No, it does not bother me. Opposite, I am amused how pathetic your "arguments" are. Obscenities mixed with ranting and raving.

No, it does not bother me.

Wonderful ...

Then should quit wasting both our time commenting on it.

Move on ...

I posted an image with no editorial comment of my own
The document appears genuine.

You consistently do that – Post something that “appears” genuine or "may be" the truth
Without ever fact-checking anything.

If it is cop-hating, anti-government, can cause fear or unrest – then you post it since it
“APPEARS” to be genuine and truthful.

Why?

Appearance can be deceptive and something that's deceptive is not what it seems.
Be constantly warned that a deceptive person will lead you to believe something
other than the truth. That obviously just happened to you,

It was indeed genuine – however the author ignored to state the fact that it had expired –
Intentionally, I feel sure.

When you blindly accept what someone deceptively and maliciously posts as “genuine” and
being currently valid to then post it here – you have acted as a pimp. Yes – a pimp …

Disgraceful …

As far as creating dissent - good thing we have … you to quash any of that.

Of course – when the dissent is based on omissions, lies or half-truths.

I will continue to do my best …

I posted an image with no editorial comment of my own.

It's been hilarious watching you have another online hissy fit.

Dance little puppet!

The rest of your screed is just more of your pseudo-moralistic lecturing.

I posted an image with no editorial comment of my own.

For what reason ...

To make it appear that something nefarious had occurred?

Images can be deceptive.

You proved that ...

Dance little puppet!

Nah – I’d rather play the Tambourine …