Even politicians have a right to a private social/sex life,unless they are hypocrites about it. Which doesn't seem to be the case here.

Even politicians have a right to a private social/sex life,unless they are hypocrites about it.

Employer and Employee.

Employer and Employee.

Don't dip your pen into the company ink.

Wait! She doesn't have a pen.

I personally hope whoever released those photos gets some serious prison time out of it.

Even politicians have a right to a private social/sex life,unless they are hypocrites about it.

She was being recorded and she knew it.

No one went peeking through her windows to learn this.

She did the lezbo thing with her staffer, included her husband in the gig. They vacationed together (which is where the nudie hair brushing photo came from and the husband took the photo).

Then she dumped the staffer and started sleeping with some other dude so her hubby divorced her.

And you think we should feel sorry for her? Or that she was actually very private about these people she was sleeping with?

Don't dip your pen into the company ink.

Wait! She doesn't have a pen.

Maybe she has a strap-on pen.

Even politicians have a right to a private social/sex life,unless they are hypocrites about it.

Employer and Employee.

They are NOT our personal employees.

Prove me wrong and fire one of them.

And you think we should feel sorry for her?

In WHAT Bizarro World you live in does stating even a politician has a right to personal privacy equate to feeling sorry for one of them?

Are you one of those sex freaks that thinks anyone with a sex life needs to be punished?

In WHAT Bizarro World you live in does stating even a politician has a right to personal privacy equate to feeling sorry for one of them?

She was sleeping with the hired help. She was an employer, exploiting a employee in a relationship in which the employee may not have felt able to refuse sex. It also leads to situations where someone might get a job or get re-hired for another campaign based on sexual availability to the employer. Others who apply for those jobs might be just as good or better at the job but not be willing to perform sexually as part of the deal.

Relationships involving inherently unequal power dynamics should always be against the law. Cops shouldn't have sex with suspects or people in their custody. Teachers shouldn't have sex with students (up to graduate programs). Hollywood directors and producers should not have sex with actors. People shouldn't have sex with those who work for them.

So, no, it isn't okay to diddle the maid, petey-boy.

Are you one of those sex freaks that thinks anyone with a sex life needs to be punished?

I generally have found having a sex life is punishment enough. The punishment usually fits the crime.     : )

Laz would hit that....WHOOPS wrong forum...

A blast from the past. I wonder how Laz is doing. Last I knew, he had heart palpitations.

(a) A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not engage in a sexual relationship with any employee of the House who works under the supervision of the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, or who is an employee of a committee on which the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner serves. This paragraph does not apply with respect to any relationship between two people who are married to each other

She was sleeping with the hired help.

The HORRORS!

Has that ever happened before?

She should be hanged! Hanged,I tell ya!

She was an employer, exploiting a employee in a relationship in which the employee may not have felt able to refuse sex.

Try to control your vapors.What she actually did was give that employee a "get out of jail free" card,and a virtual guarantee they would never get fired.

What she actually did was give that employee a "get out of jail free" card,and a virtual guarantee they would never get fired.

Not at all.

She exploited her employee and her husband for sexual dalliance and then dumped both for careerism and to whore herself out to a new man who wasn't willing to be a cuck for her bizarre sexual habits. That is why her husband divorced her.

(a) A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not engage in a sexual relationship with any employee of the House who works under the supervision of the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, or who is an employee of a committee on which the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner serves. This paragraph does not apply with respect to any relationship between two people who are married to each other

I'm betting there would be no more than a couple pols who would be able to remain in office if they and their employees had to start taking lie detector tests.

Laz would hit that....WHOOPS wrong forum...

Are you referring to Lazmatazz from Free Republic back in the day (late 90's)?

Was he the same guy whose tagline read "Proudly commenting on articles without reading them since 1998"?

As I recall, he had admitted to being a big time coke user - or was that Mudboy Slim? He (Mud) posted over at LP, not sure if I've seen any posts here as of yet. A couple of his wacky music threads are probably still around.

She exploited her employee and her husband for sexual dalliance

Yeah,and since they were both children too young to make decisions for themselves,they had no choice but to go along with that evil woman,right?

Tell me,were they worried she would spank them if they refused,or worried she WOULDN'T spank them if they didn't?

As I recall, he had admitted to being a big time coke user - or was that Mudboy Slim?

Nope,that was Laz. It's also supposed to be what caused his divorce from the FR woman he married. Apparently he hid it from her until after they were married.

Yeah,and since they were both children too young to make decisions for themselves,they had no choice but to go along with that evil woman,right?

She was diddling the help.

This is no different than Xlinton diddling Lewinsky in the Oval Orifice except that the Bent One never brought in Hitlery to join them in a threesome. I hope not anyway.

The inherent inequality of the relationship makes it illegitimate. It calls into question whether the subordinate can give meaningful consent to a sexual relationship.

This also opens up the congress-slut to charges of sexual harassment and sexual exploitation of employees, creating a hostile work environment for her other employees, etc.

She's now denying that she's sleeping with her male staff member. It sounds like the ex-husband has witnesses to prove she is. And she did sleep with her young campaign staffer who also worked in her offices as well, violating House rules.

She is trying to brazen it out like a hussy. I'm not sure the Dems will go along with it. Trump will have a field day with it and they don't want this congress-slut sitting there casting votes on impeachment while Trump is railing against them and her.

I'd like to see Trump nail their hides to the wall personally.

And you think we should feel sorry for her?

No. I feel sorry for the rest of us if we allow this sort of thing to happen.

Despite your obvious slant,this was a private affair and not public knowledge.

It's a freedom and personal privacy issue.

She was being recorded and she knew it.

So what? She doesn't have a right to make home movies?

She did the lezbo thing with her staffer, included her husband in the gig. They vacationed together (which is where the nudie hair brushing photo came from and the husband took the photo).

So what? Are you trying to claim she didn't have a right to do any of that? What is it about brushing hair that has you so upset?

Then she dumped the staffer and started sleeping with some other dude so her hubby divorced her.

Let me see if I have this straight,ok? She was supposed to get permission from you before dumping the staffer and going back to humping men? I thought it was the girl/girl stuff that had you so upset?

And you think we should feel sorry for her?

Where did I ever claim that? She has the SAME right to privacy that you and I do,and even more importantly to us,we only have the same rights to privacy that she does.

Or that she was actually very private about these people she was sleeping with?

Do you have a reading comprehension problem? SHE wasn't the one that made all this public.

(a) A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not engage in a sexual relationship with any employee of the House who works under the supervision of the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, or who is an employee of a committee on which the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner serves. This paragraph does not apply with respect to any relationship between two people who are married to each other

Interesting theory,and everybody sane knows it happens every day.

Now,if you want to claim that a political boss gives his or her employee the ultimatum "Have sex with me or you are fired!",I think that politician should not only be removed from office,but put on trial for attempted rape.

Mudboy slim has a ton of posts here.

Know what happened to him? IIRC,he dropped off of FR,and I had no idea he ever posted here. I don't remember seeing any of his posts.

She's now denying that she's sleeping with her male staff member. It sounds like the ex-husband has witnesses to prove she is. And she did sleep with her young campaign staffer who also worked in her offices as well, violating House rules.

Katie Hill's resignation

It is with a broken heart that today I announce my resignation from Congress. This is the hardest thing I have ever had to do, but I believe it is the best thing for my constituents, my community, and our country.

See my official statement below.

Know what happened to him? IIRC,he dropped off of FR,and I had no idea he ever posted here. I don't remember seeing any of his posts.

He was around these parts for a while back in 2017, his last post was 2017-08-17. Some of his threads numbered in the thousands of replies.

Did a quick check at Freak Republic, this appears to be his latest there.

"Sometimes, you just gotta STOP gettin' stoned!!"

Apparently he was banned not long after that.

I had no idea he ever posted here. I don't remember seeing any of his posts.

Here are all the times you talked to slim here.

https://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=sneakypete&To=mudboy+slim&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=

Know what happened to him? IIRC,he dropped off of FR,and I had no idea he ever posted here. I don't remember seeing any of his posts.

MUD opused out of FR.

http://www.freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&showall=Y&aid=17182 [Dead link, defunct site]

To: Conall Cernach

The OPUS that got me "permanently" BANNED from TOS...

"My first OPUS ever...F*** This Place, I'M OUTTA HERE!!

The MudCave / 21 April 2005 / Mudboy Slim

Posted on 04/21/2005 11:49:24 PM EDT by Mudboy Slim

Alright, I don't wanna mess this up on account of it being my first OPUS ever, but here goes!!

F** this place, y'all are nothin' but a bunch of BUMP-ON-THE-LOG RINOs!! SHEEEESH...I might as well be hangin' out with a bunch of LePers as waste my time FReepin' with y'all!! How many of y'all even FReepin' know that we stood up fer the Constitution in demanding that US Senators disallow the UN-Constitutional Filibustering of Dubyuh's Judicial appointments last Thursday?! JimRob flew all the way from California to DeeCee to be there, and there were 30 F%^$in' FReepers there!! Yeah, they were the best of the FReepers (Kristinn, Angelwood, tgslTakoma, BillF, BufordP, Doctor Raoul, Congressman BillyBob, gunsareok, and YES, Clinton's a Liar), but gawldurnnit, can't we muster up more than 30 folks fer such a worthy event?!

This place could be sooo much more than it is, but it seems too many of y'all are content to sit on yer FReepin' butts and let history happen to you...to HELL with that, let's make history happen the way we figger it oughtta happen!! We can win this FReepin' Culture War, but we needn't be so quick to look fer a FReepin' compromise!! However, Star's reprimand to me this evening just pointed out why this place ain't where I need to be wastin' all my valuable time. FReeRepublic.com used to be a glorious place...hey JimRob, remember when Congressman Bob Barr told America that the Clinton Impeachment WOULDDA NEVER HAPPENED had it not been fer the noble efforts of FReepers?! And then there was the Election Imbroglio of 2000, when FReepers stood up and were counted in Florida and the RATS were exposed as the FRauds they've always been...dammit, if any Newbie FReeper don't know FReeper History, what the heck good are they?!

But things have gradually changed...it became obvious to me when first Snow Bunny was unceremoniously OUSTED by a JUNTA of blood-thirsty GuildMembers. I hear Arne Fufkin was involved, but he's never fessed up to me about it. Even my good FRiend Howlin--reputedly a founding member of the Coven...LOL--was as disgusted as me by that pack of jackals...and y'all know who you are!!

But it got worse, it got personal...have y'all heard of my episode with ST.LOUIE1?! LOL...gimme a break!! See, after the blood-thirsty GuildMembers sliced and diced Snow Bunny and ran her off, they took over her whole concept of Daily Threads...Chrissie was all about building long-term relationships and the Daily threads do exactly that. I love the Canteen, the Foxhole, and the Daily Dose, but I'll never truly feel welcome at the FReeper's Finest on account of the stroy I'm about to tell you.

See, I usedta be good buddies with all the folks on the Finest...heck, I even had the distinct honor of having a Finest thread written about yers truly...LOL!! Until that fateful day I questioned the manhood of AG John Ashcroft...see, apparently, ST.LOUIE1 is a big buddy of John Ashcroft's (St. Louis, MO...MO Senator Ashcroft, you do the math), and when I began to question Ashcroft fer his lack of cajones, Ol' ST.LOUIE1 got hisself a burr under his saddle...LOL!! But instead of conFRonting me personally, he sicced the Admin MODS on me and demanded I cease and desist all negativity towards his butt-buddy, RINO John Ashcroft!!

I, OTOH, told ST.LOUIE1 to BITE ME!! Which he did, three times. Every time I posted a comment to ST.LOUIE1 regarding his RINO buttboy John Ashcroft, my posting privileges were unceremoniously discontinued fer ever-increasing amounts of time. Still, I posted my anti-Ashcroft screeds and took my punishment like a man...but I've questioned ST.LOUIE1's manhood ever since!!

Now, since we're questioning folks' manhood and everything, let me spill the beans about that rascal, Grampa Dave. Now there's a JUDAS fer ya!! I was never anything but civil, deferential, and respectful of that old man until the day I crossed him on this issue or that...LOL, I still have no idea what the issue was, but I printed it off and have it around the MudCave somewhere...but that meek old man came after me like I was personally gang-bangin' his ol' lady!! SHEEESH, he called me--oh, BTW, I remember the issue, Ol' Gramps said I wasn't supportive enuff of Dubyuh's candidacy sometime last August--the old fart called me a "Moby Troll" who was the worst kind of EVIL on account of me being so good at FReepin'...LOL!! BTW, Grampa Dave, you OLD FReepin' FART, anytime you wanna be a bastard to my face...BRING IT ON!! I got nothing moral against whuppin' some old fart's ARSE!!

Well, I got other KRAP on other FReepers, but I'm gonna shut my trap fer now...I'm certain I've made enuff of a fool of myself fer one evening, but I wanna make this perfectly clear, all you Newbies have no right whatsoever telling me what I can and cannot post on this thread or that. Star, I love you and everything, but I was FReepin' the Canteen when you were knee-high to a grasshopper, girl, and when you tell me what you think I should be posting and what I shouldn't be posting, well, you can just keep that KRAP to yerself, 'cuz I couldn't care less about yer opinion on what you think is appropriate fer me to post...and YES, I mean that!!

I'll FReep at y'all sometime on or about the 16th of May...MUD

__________________________________________________

I've promised Mr. Robinson that I'll be a FReeper 'til the day I die, so obviously my departure from FR.com will only be temporary...god willin' and the creek don't rise...but I will reFRain from posting on FR.com fer the next three weeks, three days, three hours, thirty-three minutes and thirty-three seconds, but if you need to speak to me in the meantime, I'll be over at LibertyPost.org...MUD

1 posted on 04/21/2005 11:49:25 PM EDT by Mudboy Slim

So THAT'S what got me "permanently" BANNED from TOS...LOL!! Yeah, sorta harsh, but my point is that out AdminModerator system over there keeps chasing off good, solid Conservative/Libertarian FReepers while utterly failing the ACTIVISM function that made FR.com the political force it had become. Nothing against Republicans as a whole, but when FR.com becomes GOP.com or Dubyuh.com, we start to fergit how to think fer ourselves and seem to lose confidence in stating a position until we've found out what the RNC's position is, or Dubyuh's!! FReepers--and LPosters and FUers--ought to strive fer more than that!!

FReegards...MUD

60 Posted 2005-07-12 23:04:02 by Mudboy Slim [ Reply | To 0 ]

He was later on FR as relent_less, account created 02-10-2006. That handle was also banned, I believe on 03-14-2006. He might still be there working on his thousandth handle.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1260264/posts?page=1805#1805

To: ForGod'sSake; Landru; jla; MeekOneGOP; Happygal; MadIvan; Flora McDonald; Nick The Freeper; ...

"Troublesome ain't it?"

FRustratingly so...

"Would that there were a way to get our Pubbies back on track."

We must do it Congresscritter by Congresscritter...demand that Fed spending be less next year than it is this year. Considering Bush has increased a $1.8 Trillion budget to a $2.77 Trillion budget in five years, you can't convince me there's no fat in that budget.

"The flogging they take, especially from our faux press, is enough to make even the best a little punchy though."

Yep...remember what they did to Newt? The RATbot Media is ruthless, but they are becoming increasingly-irrelevant, imho.

"What's a conservative to do..."

Keep fighting 'til the day we die...no way we're surrendering to the Socialist RATS!!

1,805 posted on 03/13/2006 6:43:43 AM PST by relent_less (Strategy for Iraq: Win the War...Win the Peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1804 | View Replies ]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MUD and Jhoffa_ on LF back in 2007

https://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=3316

Title: Mudboy Slim's Greatest Hits (Volume III)
Source: Pure Mud
URL Source: http://freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&l=14&aid=23270#14
Published: Feb 18, 2007
Author: Mudboy Slim!
Post Date: 2007-02-18 18:28:04 by Jhoffa_

Sung to: Judas Priest "Breaking the Law"

There I was in my dad’s basement, out of work and down.
All inside it's so frustrating, I need some dick to pound.
Knowing that nobody cares if I live or die,
So I turn to man’s best friend to put some action in my life.

Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.

So much for that canine virtue: I’m excited when he barks!
And look now his cherry’s broken, I’m up against his heart!
You don't know what it's like, to lust the way I do.
If you did you'd find yourselves molesting Rover too!

Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.

You don't know what it's like!

(Rockin' Mud Acoustic Guitar Solo)

Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.
Blowing the dog, blowing the dog.

Poster Comment: Act now and you can own all of Mudboy's Greatest song rip-offs in a boxed, collectors edition set not available in stores

Let me see if I have this straight,ok? She was supposed to get permission from you before dumping the staffer and going back to humping men? I thought it was the girl/girl stuff that had you so upset?

I object to exploiting your subordinates at work. The same way I object to military officers diddling the enlisted. Inherently unequal, inherently destined for people to be exploited by their superiors.

As a society, we have expectations for moral conduct by military officers and by employers generally.

Katie Hill's resignation

It is with a broken heart that today I announce my resignation from Congress.

My first reaction: the House Dems made it clear they wouldn't give her a plug nickel for re-election and were prepared to fund a primary challenger to nail her ass to the wall. I think they promised her a no-holes-barred political gangbang if she didn't vamoose her skanky ass out of this political race. They might have offered her some enticement, like a paying gig at the phony Soros foundations or such.

Anyway, didn't we all know that this is how it was going to turn out? I think we did.

Here are all the times you talked to slim here.

https://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=sneakypete&To=mudboy+slim&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=

Damn chemo-brain!

Thanks!

I object to exploiting your subordinates at work. The same way I object to military officers diddling the enlisted. Inherently unequal, inherently destined for people to be exploited by their superiors.

As a society, we have expectations for moral conduct by military officers and by employers generally.

I am in complete agreement with all the above.

I also agree that people should be free to control their own personal lives,and this is still true if one of them is a boss and the other an employee.

We can not be blind to human nature in our quest to obtain fairness. We MUST allow individuals to make up their own minds about who they want to hump and who they don't want to hump.

Here are all the times you talked to slim here.

https://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/latestcomments.cgi? Fm=sneakypete&To=mudboy+slim&SNSearch=+Go+&PNU=

I plead chemo-brain. I honestly don't remember a single one of them.