I like this. Warren is rising and taking supporters from Sanders and Biden and Harris (and the rest). Warren will be the nominee. But Sanders continuing to haul in a lot of money means that he will be constantly challenging her in primary after primary, even beyond the point where he might hope to get the nomination. After all, this is just his little Senate hobby and a nice way for that worthless Commie to get some attention.

This will not only deplete her coffers (and the already anemic DNC) but it will drive her even further Left, making it harder to tack back to the middle to pick up the indy voters and making Wall Street even more leary of her than they have been since 2016.

It's All Good™. We want an extremely damaged far-far-Left Dem nominee. And for RBG to die while Trump is prez.

Warren will be the nominee.

If the nominee is from this motley crew, I agree. However, month after month of the current clown show may destroy them all. Someone might ride in on a white horse, a patriot who will sacrifice for the country, and run for the good of the country, even as they did not want to.

That reminds me. Hillary restored her law license this past March.

Hitlery is trying to look Tanned, Rested And Ready.

But that phone will not be ringing. She will never get that call other than if, say, Biden got the nomination and then died of a stroke during the Dem convention caused by the overstimulation of groping an entire Girl Scout troop on stage.

Steyer has the money but he is repulsive. Bloomberg is out. The Starbucks guy seems to have already given up on his indy run.

It's Warren. Even despirte her house-flipping and her investments in private prisons (which she now vehemently wants to outlaw). Her hypocrisy and lying on these issues are actually her strongest qualifications to be the Dem nominee. They go for the biggest liars and worst hypocrites they can nominate; it's a strategy, not an accident.

Meanwhile, POTUS brought in $125 million in the same time period. :)

That reminds me. Hillary restored her law license this past March.

I find it hard to believe she went thru the proper procedures to get her license back, she probably use some money from the Clinton Foundation to accomplish this.

That reminds me. Hillary restored her law license this past March.

So she could, in theory, get hired to lead the House impeachment manager's legal team? She was on the legal staff to impeach Nixon so she does have experience! Wouldn't that be fun?

Maybe Hiterly could declare as a 2020 Dem candidate and then she could lead the impeachment team in the House by day, campaign for president by night. These are the Xlintons, after all.

Oy veh.

I find it hard to believe she went thru the proper procedures to get her license back, she probably use some money from the Clinton Foundation to accomplish this.

I do not think there were any concerns there. Hillary was not disbarred. Se voluntarily had her license suspended as she was not using it. That's not unusual for someone in her position to not want to be bothered with continuing legal education to maintain a license they are not using.

So she could, in theory, get hired to lead the House impeachment manager's legal team?

If she did not need it for anything for years, why now? Perhaps she wants to discretely enter into a lawyer-client relationship with some friends/acquaintances for them to acquire immunity from testifying or talking to investigators.

That's not unusual for someone in her position to not want to be bothered with continuing legal education to maintain a license they are not using.

That's why I said what I said she doesn't strike me as being someone that would put in the time studying to get her license back the correct way.

someone that would put in the time studying to get her license back

I don't believe she required any studying to get her license back. The CLE applies while she holds a license. Making her license active was just an administrative matter. I'm just curious about what she plans to do that requires a law license.