(Video taken through a Nikon P900 camera)
Poster Comment:
Cool! Great shot of the Moon as well. (Sure doesn't seem like it's 239,000 miles away.)
So.... is balloon technology how NASA really photographs earth? It appears they are able to attach an equipment gondola to the Balloon...and let 'er rip into Low Earth Orbit.
One also wonders if "Astronauts" are actually embedded into a special Balloon gondola instead what's depicted in those dodgy "ISS" shots. Orbital velocity is the velocity needed to achieve balance between gravity's pull on the satellite and the inertia of the satellite's motion -- the satellite's tendency to keep going. This is approximately 17,000 mph (27,359 kph) at an altitude of 150 miles (242 kilometers). Without gravity, the satellite's inertia would carry it off into space.
Moving juuuust a bit slower than 17,000 MPH. Source:
'HOW STUFF WORKS'
https://science.howstuffworks.com/satellite6.htm
#41: GrandIsland To: Tooconservative (#39)
Interesting. If the sun is flat, is it fucking hot on both sides, or just the side that faces the earth?
So the sun is like a gigantic puck light?
GrandIsland posted on 2019-10-01 20:34:09 Reply Private Reply
#42: Tooconservative To: GrandIsland (#41)
I think they squabble over that, like a fight over religious doctrine. They also have this thing where, of course, the earth is under a big dome to hold all the air in and also to keep the water from all running off the edges of Antarctica - which is surrounding the entire Flat Earth - and so the dome must contain all the places that we can travel. They get into fights about whether the sun and the moon are both inside the dome or whether the moon is inside the dome but the sun is outside the dome. Think about that one for a while. AFAIK, Liberator has not indicated his position on whether the sun and moon are both inside the dome (or not).
Here's another pic to illustrate:
Please don't ask me questions like that. I can only tolerate so much dumbassery per day. LOL
Just to cheer us up, here's another Flat Sun picture. It's from the Flat Sun Society.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-01 20:48:21 Reply Private Reply
#43: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#42)
I think I understand. God's name is Seneca Crane. His original intelligent design was the arena for the Hunger Games. That went so well in the first book that he upscaled it to create Earth. That was before the third book where Katniss shot an arrow into the dome, creating climate change and the end of the games. The end.
nolu chan posted on 2019-10-01 21:07:20 Reply Private Reply
#44: GrandIsland To: nolu chan, Tooconservative (#43)
Got it. Thanks.
GrandIsland posted on 2019-10-01 21:34:56 Reply Private Reply
#45: nolu chan To: GrandIsland (#44)
nolu chan posted on 2019-10-01 21:46:12 Reply Private Reply
#46: GrandIsland To: nolu chan (#45)
Thats it... you solved it. If earth is like a space pizza, then the water doesnt run over the edges... because of the CRUST.
Youll win the:
Nobel Prize
The Copley Medal
Albert Einstein World Award of Science
And the Wolf Foundation Prize
GrandIsland posted on 2019-10-01 21:53:54 Reply Private Reply
#47: Tooconservative To: GrandIsland (#44)
I think we've all lost at least one IQ point just from reading this thread. Millions of our neurons committed suicide rather than to be forced to parse and process even more stupidity. But maybe that is just letting the Flattards win, by wearing us down with their Monumental Stupidity until our brains are exhausted and we just mumble, "OK, whatever you say, just leave me alone."
I'm going to have a sip of a quality cognac and try to forget about frisbees and Lady Schick hairdryers and flat objects in general. : )
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-01 22:12:49 Reply Private Reply
#48: Liberator To: Tooconservative, GrandIsland, Deckard, Nolu Chan (#47)
I must say I'm amused and encouraged by how well the thread has gone.
There has at least been some cursory contemplation, examination, and consideration of how the actual realm created by God might operate.
And at least TooConservative now finally admits that NASA lies. (But not specifically the BIG LIE that NASA never landed on the Moon. And CAN'T.) Ergo, you still have NOT answered the bell.
Btw -- "Low Earth Orbit" is considered 99 to 1200 mi. But THIS is the reality: NASA balloons can reach up to 120,000' beyond earth; THAT IS THE REAL "LOW EARTH ORBIT." (Yes, propelled over the Earth by...(drum roll: Nothing but Primitive NASA BALLOONS. No Virgina, there ARE no propelled "Satellites" orbiting Earth at 17,000 MPH. Sorry to burst your bubble.)
NASA and SPACE X Rockets are all show. Their rockets are UN-MANNED, and blast off, eventually curving laterally...eventually crashing over water -- which is why ALL NASA and all "Space" complexes are located at Cape Canaveral and Houston. (where spash-downs of the Rocket corpses occur -- as well as the Gondola/Capsules float down via parachutes -- WITHOUT WITNESSES.)
*DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.*
Q: WHY WE CAN'T EVER LEAVE "LOW" EARTH ORBIT:
The truth:
The Bible speaks of a "Firmament" (or glass dome) within which He placed the stars, the Moon, AND the Sun.) Yes, this means there is NO "Outer Space" or "Billions of Light Years"; It also means both the Sun and Moon are necessarily very close to Earth; With similar diameters (proven by geometric calculations) to be approximately 30 miles. Again -- look at that balloon floating past the Moon. Magnification reveals the truth: IS real close.
(Look up 'OPERATION DOMINIC'. It was a futile attempt to detonate nukes in order to "blast through" the Firmament. That's right -- WE CANNOT EVER LEAVE THIS REALM.)
MOREOVER, as per Genesis account (and your own eyes) -- the Earth is FLAT, IMMOVABLE, and...a CIRCLE (Not a "BALL.") There is ZIP proof that either the Sun and Moon are anything BUT circles as well. We do not know whether they are "discs."
(The "Dark Side" of the Moon?? No one has STILL seen "it." All we see of the Moon is the SAME markings . From no matter which part of Earth you look at it.
A "Round" Sun, GI? And "round" MOON?? You mean...like a BALL?? How do we know that? Is it because you've been told that's the case since you were doing ca-ca in your over-filled diaper?? Is your "testimony" it based on "Science" books, Hollywood movies, Star Trek, and NASA- created CGI images and illustrations?
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/thestudio/
The Studio is a team of designers, artists, makers, strategists, and thinkers. We are passionate about helping scientists and engineers imagine the future, and giving people a sense of awe about the universe.
You can dismiss 'Flat Earth' proofs all you want (while ignoring hundreds of them-- including your own eyes); But at the same time, we're all still getting bombarded and bamboozled by this fake matrix of civic, media, Hollywood, and scientific "reality" your Overlords have created.
Put down the Schlitz tall-boy and...SNAP OUT OF IT.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 11:36:27 Reply Private Reply
#49: Liberator To: All (#48)
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 11:57:23 Reply Private Reply
#50: Liberator To: Deckard (#33)
I'm not sure I understand the full context of your question.
We know by personal observation that the Sun circles over earth along various paths depending on the time of year, obviously taking 24 hours to complete its circuit over the plane.
THAT SAID...
Your question does cause a very interesting further pause in the areas of earth which are receiving sunlight during a typical 24-hour day....
If (as we are told) the "globe" is perpetually spinning east at @1000 MPH, AND the sun (we are told) is stationary, wouldn't that mean almost the entire "globe" should be bathed in sunlight ALL the time?
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 12:47:59 Reply Private Reply
#51: Deckard To: Liberator (#50)
No it wouldn't. The earth's circumference is 24,901 miles, which means an entire rotation takes 24 hours or one day.
Why is it light on one side of the world and dark on the opposite side at the same moment?
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 13:00:41 Reply Private Reply
#52: Deckard To: Tooconservative (#35)
That doesn't explain sunspots or the ensuing disruptions to satellite communications at certain times of the year, not to mention UV rays, suntanning and skin cancer.
More shenanigans by NASA perhaps?
(And furthermore, why do people use the phrase "not to mention..." and then go on to mention the items they were not going to mention?)
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 13:09:04 Reply Private Reply
#53: Deckard To: Liberator (#48)
From what I have read, that operation was simply high altitude nuclear tests.
When I did a search for "Operation Dominic", I stumbled across something called Operation Fishbowl
That's right -- WE CANNOT EVER LEAVE THIS REALM.
Bill Nye the Science Guy agrees.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 13:20:54 Reply Private Reply
#54: Liberator To: Liberator, TooConservative, A K A Stone, Hank Rearden, Deckard, Watchman, GrandIsland, nolu chan, Pinguinite, All 25 Posters at LF, Undetermined Lurkers (#8)
This analysis provides at least one major motive for making the entire continent Antarctica and any trespassing of HUGE area south of 60 degrees a strictly verboten "NO-GO" area.
One obvious Reason: It is a staging area and base for hiding NASA Balloon/Satellite departures, aka "Launches."
If you watch (please stay with it -- it'll open your eyes), you will learn the fascinating air force protocols and techniques for launching, monitoring and capturing these NASA Balloons; Technical information; and video.
IMPORTANT: This proves without a shadow of doubt that the "fuel" of actual NASA "Satellite Launches" is Helium, and the medium, BALLOONS. Need "proof"? The author of this video provides a copy of the official log of names of the Balloons/Satellites BY DATE and Project name that were launched. Including the one name you should recognize: 'MIR'. You remember it, right? MIR was called an "INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION".
Check out the logs from 1997-2002. MIR was launched VIA BALLOON. It was also supplied VIA BALLOONS. No, NOT via "Rocket Ships." (see docs under "Payloads" at 44:55 and onward.)
Why else should this cited official log and references of 'MIR' to the Balloon log be extremely fascinating? Let's refer to NASA's "facts":
... Adding modules over the years, and then sometimes rearranging them, the Russians had built the strangest, biggest structure ever seen in outer space. Traveling at an average speed of 17,885 mph, the space station orbited about 250 miles above the Earth.
SOURCE: NASA History
https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4225/mir/mir.htm
FACT:
1) I think we can all agree that Balloon can NOT soar 250 miles above the Earth.
2) As already mentioned and cited, "Low Earth Orbit" is defined as between "99 miles and 1200 miles", true and actual "Low Earth Orbit" is considerably less. If NASA's Balloons are only able to attain altitudes of up to 120,000 or 140,000 feet, isn't that actually closer to say 25 miles??
3) This also obviously means 'MIR' was certainly NOT "traveling at an average speed of 17,885 mph" as NASA stated.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 13:33:47 Reply Private Reply
#55: Liberator To: Deckard (#53)
Yes, and THAT ("high altitude") is exactly how the Dominic mission would understandably be described to the public.
In truth, it really was indeed a "high altitude test." But to "test" exactly what? (THE FIRMAMENT, aka God's Dome.) The Soviets also tried their best as well during the 1950s. THEY ALL KNOW THE TRUTH.
Other non-mainstream sources tell the real truth for the reason behind that insane mission.
"Dominic = Dominion of God". They knew what it was. And tried to crash through His Dome/Firmament.
Yup, Fishbowl was another bizarre experiment/mission/attempt to crack the Firmament/Dome and escape beyond....
Were the true intentions divulged, it would justifiably evoke incredulity and uber-raised eyebrows, wouldn't it?
I'd also seen Bill Nye's statement. It's strange, isn't it? NOT because it's true, but because he's been one of the public faces of shilling for Establishment's Fake Science Op.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 13:48:34 Reply Private Reply
#56: Liberator To: A K A Stone (#13)
The surface of the Nile -- like all water and oceans IS flat. It's bottom slopes.
Rivers flow because its water-mass pushes it...where it finally seeks and finds its ultimate level. In the case of the Nile, The Mediterranean Sea.
In the case of the Great Lakes, Niagara Falls and St. Lawrence River -- the Atlantic Ocean. And so forth.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 13:56:05 Reply Private Reply
#57: Liberator To: Tooconservative (#34)
Congratulations!
In a sea of TooConservative's abject absurdity and hyperbolic turds, you've succeeded in staining LF with a top 5 all-time stupid post.
This gaslighting technique of yours and censorship crusade -- how's that working out for you?
Your lame derision and mockery of those who have looong exposed the Rockefellerians/Jesuits/Bilderberg/Illuminati/Freemasons/CFR elites for what they are -- actual dark, subversive organizations and entities intent in ushering their dystopic One World Government -- no longer works. That BS may have worked 10 years ago.
The truth about those orgs and their like-minded agenda to control EVERYTHING is out there all over the place, exposed for the world to see (much to your chagrin, frustration, and futile efforts to support censorship and to restrict sharing free knowledge.) THE GALL OF TRUTH SEEKERS!! How dare we!
This collective of Global/Elites (as you named some of them) are openly and actively changing this world for the worst with their Globalist NWO agenda. Even YOU know it...
So calm down. It's ok to surrender and refrain from your cartoonish portrayal and lies that these elite orgs are just benign, phantom organizations, the victims of unfounded paranoia from "CTs".
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 14:19:21 Reply Private Reply
#58: Liberator To: A K A Stone (#13)
If its surface is FLAT for its entire 3,000 miles, that means there is absolutely NO earth curvature (as we are told should be the case) for 3,000 miles. There's no refuting this.
The reason a barge is used to videotape and document the trip along the river is so the result can't be faked.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 14:24:53 Reply Private Reply
#59: Liberator To: Deckard (#51)
Yes, I agree.
This is in accordance to the Scientists' "Spinning Globe Earth" theory AND Earth-revolves-around-the-Sun" theory.
Why is it light on one side of the world and dark on the opposite side at the same moment?
Because it takes @24 hours for the Sun to shine to perpetually rotate in a circuit over the entire face of the Earth. AND, because the Sun is local and NOT 93,000 million miles away.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 14:39:34 Reply Private Reply
#60: Liberator To: Deckard, TooConservative (#52)
TC's understanding of the Sun's short (local) distance from Earth by Flat Earthers and Bible-Earther literalists is correct.
As to just what "sun spots" are, there ARE interesting theories as you might assume. Regarding "disruptions to satellite comms"? Electro-magnetic interference is a primary theory. UV rays? Dunno if its possible to explain the composition and dynamics of some things. Like the Sun AND Moon. Theories? Of course.
(And furthermore, why do people use the phrase "not to mention..." and then go on to mention the items they were not going to mention?)
Maybe...For the same reason, "Furthermore", "Moreover," and, "I-forget-to-include-this" are used.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 14:51:11 Reply Private Reply
#61: Tooconservative To: Liberator (#60)
I enjoy using "It goes without saying". You have to give them hope that you won't be saying anything more on that topic but then can stare them in the eyes as they slowly realize it was just a ploy. : )
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-02 15:21:28 Reply Private Reply
#62: Liberator To: Tooconservative (#61)
;-)
Liberator posted on 2019-10-02 15:25:08 Reply Private Reply
#63: Deckard To: Liberator (#54)
I don't dispute that, I think we just disagree as to why it's restricted.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 15:29:41 Reply Private Reply
#64: Tooconservative To: Liberator (#57)
Perhaps you should consider whether my mocking to get you to defend your Rockefellerians/Jesuits/Bilderberg/Illuminati/Freemasons/CFR CTs is because I am a crafty Reptilian, trying to deflect your attention away from us Reptilians.
BTW, I don't recall that you've ever taken a position on Reptilian Theory.
So here's your chance to go on the record. After all, no one knew you were into Flat Earth Theory until just this year.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-02 15:31:58 Reply Private Reply
#65: Deckard To: Liberator (#55)
From what I have seen, it's one flat-earther with a Pinterest page.
I'd also seen Bill Nye's statement. It's strange, isn't it? NOT because it's true, but because he's been one of the public faces of shilling for Establishment's Fake Science Op.
After researching that quote, it appears to have been taken out of context and used in a flat earth meme.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 15:32:40 Reply Private Reply
#66: Deckard To: Liberator (#57)
It's called a straw man:
Find or create a seeming element of your opponents argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad.
Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges.
Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
I'm with you on pretty much everything else Lib, so I am not going to make fun of you for your flat earth beliefs.
At this point in time however I'm not on board.
What you are saying might very well be true.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 15:38:55 Reply Private Reply
#67: Deckard To: Tooconservative, Liberator (#64)
Good thing you didn't ask me.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-02 15:40:52 Reply Private Reply
#68: GrandIsland To: Liberator, Deckard (#51)
Im not a huge fan of Dicktards, we aint best buds... but damn, thats an excellent question he asked. If the earth is FLAT, how is it sunny on one side and dark on the other at the very same moment?
Does NASA make the water in your toilet spin one direction, when you flush?
GrandIsland posted on 2019-10-02 18:16:42 Reply Private Reply
#69: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#67)
I'm not going to take that chance. Wait your turn.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-02 19:16:33 Reply Private Reply
#70: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#18)
I bet the dam Gypsies had something to do with it,too!
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:38:42 Reply Private Reply
#71: sneakypete To: GrandIsland (#19)
That's not a bet I would be placing money against.
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:40:37 Reply Private Reply
#72: sneakypete To: Liberator (#24)
Gravity is now a THEORY?????
I hope someone responsible ends up taking over your finances so you don't end up homeless and hungry.
BTW,that was where I quit reading. I just don't have the necessary patience to go any further.
Sorry.
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:45:36 Reply Private Reply
#73: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#29)
Yew talk-kin bout ME,boy?
Ah bet you talk-kin bout me.
WATCH IT,causen ahs watching YEW,TO!
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:49:16 Reply Private Reply
#74: Tooconservative To: sneakypete (#73)
I just had a birthday very recently so I do feel I am now a qualified member in good standing of LF's elite Contrarian Old Asshole Club.
Of course, I lack your considerable seniority so I'm really just a Junior Asshole at this point.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-03 15:52:30 Reply Private Reply
#75: sneakypete To: nolu chan (#37)
ISA watch-in you,to,boy!
Dam trubblemakin killjoy!
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:52:33 Reply Private Reply
#76: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#74)
Ah didn get no memburshp dos.
Whurs mah monie?
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:55:00 Reply Private Reply
#77: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#74)
Not to worrie. I am shore you will grow into hit.
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 15:56:13 Reply Private Reply
#78: Liberator To: GrandIsland, Deckard (#68)
I'm always up for honest and legit questions (or issues.)
You internally you envision a globe-earth as we've all been told/taught in the Heliocentric Model -- that the Earth is angled at 23 degrees as it rotates around the Sun.
In the Flat Earth model version of Day/Night, the Sun rotates are IT. The magnetic North Pole is dead-center of the Flat Earth model. (The restricted Antarctica and unknown-beyond is the outer ring.)
As you see here, the Sun rotates in its circuit from East to West, illuminating half the world every 12 hours -- just like the Globe Earth model. It shifts its circuit and angle slightly as the Seasons are also demonstrated.
These are just a simple demonstrations.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-03 16:51:07 Reply Private Reply
#79: Liberator To: sneakypete (#72)
Gravity is ABSOLUTELY only a theory created by the Cult of Fake "Science" to explain all its other BS.
I hope someone responsible ends up taking over your finances so you don't end up homeless and hungry. BTW,that was where I quit reading.
Wait a minute; Aren't you the one who actually believed Elon Musk floated a CAR in "Outer Space"?? I should be worried about YOU.
Reading NOT necessary:
Liberator posted on 2019-10-03 17:01:46 Reply Private Reply
#80: Liberator To: nolu chan (#37)
I don't think you've researched the phenomena of "eclipse" much.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-03 17:05:06 Reply Private Reply
#81: Liberator To: Deckard (#65)
I've found numerous corroborative sources. Many which document and detail those same similar missions. Very interesting. And disturbing.
During the 1950s and early 1960s, the US military and its various newly created "National Security" agencies and depts had virtual carte blanche to do whatever they wanted.
Remember -- in virtual secret, they began conducting crazy medical/drug experiments on its own military personnel and those in jail; sent huge task forces to explore Antarctica (see Admiral Byrd), detonated high alt nukes, underground and above ground nukes just miles from Western US population centers. And how many Pacific Islands did they contaminate indiscriminately? It appears quite a few of these operations were rogue, "playing with House Money." (We also know certain Alphabet Agys, MSM, and Social Media giants are all in bed together, quashing truth while advancing lies and a Coup, focusing on other ways and operations that endanger us all.)
Back to the issue at hand on controlling information and criminalizing "CTs"....
There are ramifications and dangers from the massive info take-downs, censorship, and deep-sixes of truth and "truthers", and "CTs" -- many related to "Flat Earth," 911, NASA, JFK, PizzaG*te, "False Flags", 0bama's BC, etc.
These days the only way to find this kind of stuff is to diligently drill down for and find one good source; usually that source will have bookmarked similar channels...and so forth. It's one reason I feel we have only so much time before ALL truth is gone, leaving nothing but mis-info & dis-info.
I have been monitoring this kind of stuff in real time at YT for the past six months. Just months ago YT's algorythms were bouncing you to related material. They've shut that down. You'd be shocked at the volume that's already been disappeared.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-03 17:30:40 Reply Private Reply
#82: Deckard To: Liberator (#78)
From your video it appears that much of the world remains in darkness all the time seems to me.
I was watching the sun chasing the moon - that video depiction seems sketchy, no offense.
Deckard posted on 2019-10-03 17:43:53 Reply Private Reply
#83: Deckard To: Liberator (#81)
That's one reason why I haven't completely dismissed your flat earth beliefs. Somebody or several somebodies do not want this information to be seen. Same thing happening with numerous other sites that are anathema to those who preach the official government dogma,
Deckard posted on 2019-10-03 17:50:52 Reply Private Reply
#84: nolu chan To: Liberator (#80)
Try your mindless bullshit on Dr. Neil Degrasse Tyson.
Start at 2m23s
https://youtu.be/hLPPE3_DVCw?t=143
Start at beginning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLPPE3_DVCw
StarTalk
780K subscribers
Neil deGrasse Tyson takes on the subject of our spherical world, and this time he has not only science but history on his side. If you want to follow along and then test your knowledge, enroll in this Brilliant course:
https://brilliant.org/StarTalk/
Note: In illustrating a total lunar eclipse we used a bit of animation that didnt portray Earths umbra and penumbra accurately. To see a graphic that accurately depicts both portions of Earth's shadow in space, visit
https://www.startalkradio.net/shedding-light-on-earths-shadow-in-our-recent-youtube-video/
nolu chan posted on 2019-10-03 19:53:09 Reply Private Reply
#85: sneakypete To: Liberator (#79)
No. "Space" "floated a car in space" because everything in space is weightless.
Planets float in space. Do does the Sun. Just in case you don't know,they are all heavier than a car.
sneakypete posted on 2019-10-03 21:02:59 Reply Private Reply
#86: Tooconservative To: sneakypete (#85)
Well, heavy is kind of a relative term.
They recently celebrated the first orbit of the car out to a near-Mars trajectory. Musk says they might someday send a small launch just to take some photos of it to see how badly space has treated it.
Since space is really hard on things, the car will just disintegrate mostly. After a year of cosmic rays and unprotected solar radiation, all the car's paint, tires, plastics, and leather have already turned to space dust, a little cloud floating around the decaying car. The metals and carbon fiber parts will last somewhat longer. Some years from now, it will be aluminum frame and what little bits of glass haven't been broken by micro-meteorites that keep bashing it.
It's still the only vehicle certified as a road vehicle to be launched into space. Funny, Musk shopped it around and offered free launch space to the Air Force and NASA and they all turned him down. They wouldn't put their stuff on his rocket. He flies it once (with all 27 rocket engines firing and then spectacularly lands both boosters in tandem back in Florida and the core booster on his barge at sea) and now they line up to pay him to launch stuff on his Falcon Heavy.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-03 22:28:16 Reply Private Reply
#87: nolu chan To: Tooconservative, sneakypete (#86)
Weight measures the force of gravity. To compare objects floating in space, mass would be the measurement of comparison.
nolu chan posted on 2019-10-04 01:24:00 Reply Private Reply
#88: Tooconservative To: nolu chan, sneakypete (#87)
Which is why I said it was a relative term.
On round (oblate spheroid) Earth, it is the force of attraction between your own mass and the immensely greater mass of the planetary gravity well.
On Flat Earth, there is no such thing as gravity. They insist that objects fall to the ground because the entire Flat Earth, sun and moon and the firmament (base of the flat earth) are all thrusting "upward" toward the sky. So objects do not fall to the ground at all; instead the ground is constantly rising up to hit the (falling) object. Thus the notion of gravity that we know from Newtonian physics is just another fancy lie promulgated by NASA, the government, the Jesuits, the Freemasons, the Build-a-burgers, and all those smart kids who passed science, math, and physics. And they're all wrong or just lying about it. To hide the fact that the Earth is both flat and is thrusting "upward" eternally.
Flattards are what you get when you neglect science education while still raising kids to believe they're all very special and smart.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-10-04 02:36:21 Reply Private Reply
#89: Liberator To: nolu chan (#84)
WHO??
The embarrassing, beclowned McScience Shill?? Who next? Bill Nye??
*cringing*
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/12/21/scientists-who-are-actually-really-stupid-1-neil-degrasse-tyson/
Scientists Who Are Actually Really Stupid: #1, Neil deGrasse Tyson
He says Venus is suffering from global warming, for instance.
His Twitter feed, naturally, is packed to the gills with daft comparisons, meaningless apples-to-oranges number crunching and red meat for his hyper-progressive fan club.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-04 07:13:25 Reply Private Reply
#90: Liberator To: Tooconservative, ALL (#88)
HA!
What a bizarre comment. "Science Education"?? "Raising kids"?? Remind us again -- what is your Doctorate in? For how long did you quash the curiousity of while teaching/indoctrinating your 7th grade pods?
Actual "Science"? NOT your forte. GATE-KEEPING and DIS-INFO is. Bravo! The best propaganda always contains some truth as you have always managed. (The purposeful mis-spelling above of "Build-a-burgers" is always a cute touch, btw.)
Your Elite Masters don't care about holding the fort at so small a forum (as you claimed recently) at LF.
I know...It galls you; The free flow of hidden information that exposes your heroes. Yes, your Gatekeeper Efforts commendable, if a bit OCD.
If any curious posters and lurkers want to investigate any of the above organizations , please do. As with all "controversial" sources, you'll want the truth, so ignore mainstream sources. Prepare to be amazed, disgusted and shocked at what you find.
Liberator posted on 2019-10-04 07:36:20 Reply Private Reply