Police reactions like this (FOR NO FREAKIN logical reason) is completely off-the-charts INSANE. Talk about TERRORIST activity caught on camera.
Good thing this guy recorded the incident or we would never know about it.
ALWAYS record the police!
| Source: | FromThe Trenches/YouTube |
| Published: | Sep 26, 2019 |
| Author: | HighImpactVlogs |
| Post Date: | 2019-09-27 05:52:56 by Deckard |
| Views: | 3365 |
Police reactions like this (FOR NO FREAKIN logical reason) is completely off-the-charts INSANE. Talk about TERRORIST activity caught on camera.
Good thing this guy recorded the incident or we would never know about it.
ALWAYS record the police!
#1: watchman To: Deckard (#0)
Dishonorable cowards, all of them.
watchman posted on 2019-09-28 07:26:37 Reply Private Reply
#2: Gatlin To: watchman (#1)
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 08:36:54 Reply Private Reply
#3: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
This is yet another case of someone using emotive language in their "language-persuasive technique" as rhetoric to influence an audience by using words and phrases with strong connotations associated with them in order to invoke an emotional response and exploit stereotypes.
And some people continually fall into the entrapment by its use.
Sad
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 09:03:28 Reply Private Reply
#4: watchman To: Gatlin (#2)
I'm not sure what the priests have to do with the police who conducted this traffic stop.
Those priests are out-and-out monsters, as are those who are protecting them. Prison for life, no parole.
watchman posted on 2019-09-28 09:07:36 Reply Private Reply
#5: Gatlin To: watchman (#4)
I am not sure how you can watch a video and describe the police officers as dishonorable cowards when the violated no departmental procedures or broke any laws.So this situation now leaves us both unsure of something
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 09:20:16 Reply Private Reply
#6: watchman To: Gatlin (#5)
watchman posted on 2019-09-28 09:43:21 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
I call upon your many years serving our country as a law enforcement officer to use your judgment and answer when I ask if this video shows police officers reacting to a shot fired from a moving vehicle was an overreaction all the while considering the propensity of copycat shootings and remembering the Texas incident of shooting from a vehicle that let 7 dead and 21 injured.
Of is this video is just another of the many complied to cast bad light by cop haters on law enforcement?
It is to be noted that the narrator showed in no way were departmental guidelines disobeyed or laws broken.
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 09:47:29 Reply Private Reply
#8: Gatlin To: watchman (#6)
Just saying were on camera after the car had been visually searched and walking to the rear of the vehicle where the individual was then being detained for questioning made all of the officers performing their duty as outlined by departmental policy and complying with all laws be a lot of dangerous cowards?
You are entitled to your subjective opinion, of course.
While I am entitled to fail to understand how you subjectively made such a demeaning classification.
There is really nothing more I can discuss on this subject with you.
I therefore, I sincerely thank you for your time and for your responses.
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 10:05:16 Reply Private Reply
#9: Gatlin To: GrandIsland (#0)
I call upon your many years serving our country as a law enforcement officer to use your judgment and answer when I ask if this video shows police officers reacting to a shot fired from a moving vehicle was an overreaction all the while considering the propensity of copycat shootings and remembering the Texas incident of shooting from a vehicle that let 7 dead and 21 injured.
Or is this video is just another of the many complied to cast bad light by cop haters on law enforcement?
Remembering that the narrator showed in no way were departmental guidelines disobeyed or laws broken.
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 10:10:58 Reply Private Reply
#10: IbJensen To: Deckard (#0)
IbJensen posted on 2019-09-28 10:29:49 Reply Private Reply
#11: Gatlin To: IbJensen (#10)
This was no routine traffic stop when the officer casually strolls up to the drivers window and says may I see your drivers license and vehicle registration, please.
This was a "felony high-risk traffic stop which
Based on your evaluation of the situation where you determined can you now please use your expertise and tell everyone in your expert opinion exactly how many cops are supposed to respond "felony high-risk traffic stop with a shot fired call in. Is it a limited number or are all available officers supposed to respond to a to a call of this nature?Thank you
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 13:09:36 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: GrandIsland, Deckard (#7)
I posted it again in Post 9 ...
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 13:11:22 Reply Private Reply
#13: GrandIsland To: Gatlin (#9)
As far as too many police. Thats horse shit. If LE felt there was a need to felony stop a vehicle, then every on duty patrolling officer will respond to the traffic stop, as an officer safety issue. Until officers know the felony stop is officer safe, contained or even the wrong car, you could never have too many officers.
I am not sure what was the cause for the felony stop. If a gun was suspected in the vehicle, or just used (shot out of a vehicle), then it was handled correctly, regardless of a gun was found or it turned out to be the wrong vehicle.
The fact that Mr. Bang was recording from the get-go, tells me he spends his time trying to set officers up for the purpose of getting people like Dicktard, hard.
Wasnt long ago that a traffic stop in Texas... turned into a nightmare and like 19 people were shot. When the sick twisted, drug addicted asshole sheep act like that, expect LE to change their training to provide the police SELF DEFENSE.
GrandIsland posted on 2019-09-28 15:14:20 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: GrandIsland (#13)
Thank you for your detailed and informative response.
This video is a textbook example of how someone can intentionally control the minds of others by taking a factually correct procedure and channel the thought process of others by presenting it in a ridiculous light to make it appear that it is an overly zealous uncontrolled act.
It plays on the psychological emotions these believers cant tolerate and the result is forming a condemning opinion on something that they wouldn't have done without the effect of these emotions.
It shows that certain emotions can be induced in someone and when he finds that he cant tolerate these emotions he does that thing that he wouldnt have done otherwise he reacts to the mind control in the manner he has just been programmed to do.
It is ever so easy to protect yourself for all of these methods of control by watching out for the controlled method emotions people try to induce in you and stop the involuntary programmed response to them.
Some folks need to start thinking and stop reacting
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-28 16:07:23 Reply Private Reply
#15: IbJensen To: Gatlin (#11)
Well. I believe an armed personnel carrier, no, several armed personnel carriers and at least a battalion of armed officers. In a case like this the driver should have been shot at the outset.
IbJensen posted on 2019-09-29 07:43:58 Reply Private Reply
#16: Gatlin To: IbJensen (#15)
If you want to be happier and improve your relationships, cut out sarcasm. Why? Because sarcasm is actually hostility disguised as humor. Despite smiling outwardly, many people who receive sarcastic comments feel put down and often think the sarcastic person is a jerk. Indeed, its not surprising that the origin of the word sarcasm derives from the Greek word sarkazein which literally means to tear or strip the flesh off. Hence, its no wonder that sarcasm is often preceded by the word cutting and that it hurts.
Whats more, since actions strongly determine thoughts and feelings, when a person consistently acts sarcastically it may only serve to heighten his or her underlying hostility and insecurity. After all, when you come right down to it, sarcasm can be used as a subtle form of bullyingand most bullies are angry, insecure, or cowardly. Alternatively, when a person stops voicing negative comments, especially sarcastic and critical ones, he or she may soon start to feel happier and more self-confident. Also, the other people in his or her life benefit even faster because they no longer have to hear the emotionally hurtful language of sarcasm.
Now, Im not saying all sarcasm is bad. It may just be better used sparingly like a potent spice in cooking. Too much of the spice, and the dish will be overwhelmed by it. Similarly, an occasional dash of sarcastic wit can spice up a chat and add an element of humor to it. But a big or steady serving of sarcasm will overwhelm the emotional flavor of any conversation and can taste very bitter to its recipient.
So, tone down the sarcasm and work on clever wit instead which is usually devoid of hostility and thus more appreciated by those youre communicating with. In essence, sarcasm is easy (as is most anger, criticism and meanness) while true, harmless wit takes talent.
Thus, the main difference between wit and sarcasm is that, as already stated, sarcasm is often hostility disguised as humor. It can be intended to hurt, and is often bitter and caustic. Witty statements are usually in response to someones unhelpful remarks or behaviors, and the intent is to unravel and clarify the issue by accentuating its absurdities. Sarcastic statements are expressed in a cutting manner; witty remarks are delivered with undisguised and (usually) harmless humor.
And don't hesitate to tell others that you don't appreciate their sarcastic comments, either.
Remember: Think well, act well, feel well, be well!
Think Sarcasm is Funny? Think Again.
Salute,
Gatlin
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-29 08:53:42 Reply Private Reply