https://www.scribd.com/document/427410168/Unclassified-memorandum-of-telephone-conversation
TRUMP-ZELENSKY TRANSCRIPT
| Source: | Scribd |
| Published: | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Author: | Presidents Trump/Zelensky |
| Post Date: | 2019-09-25 11:17:03 by nolu chan |
| Views: | 10002 |
| Source: | Scribd |
| Published: | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Author: | Presidents Trump/Zelensky |
| Post Date: | 2019-09-25 11:17:03 by nolu chan |
| Views: | 10002 |
https://www.scribd.com/document/427410168/Unclassified-memorandum-of-telephone-conversation
#1: A K A Stone To: nolu chan (#0)
A K A Stone posted on 2019-09-25 11:22:54 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#0)
Let's see how Peach Mint proceeds now, ya old sow.
Hank Rearden posted on 2019-09-25 11:35:52 Reply Private Reply
#3: redleghunter To: nolu chan (#0)
The fact the President stated the Attorney General was involved in looking into these corruption cases really defangs the House DemonRats. Of course if they call Barr to testify, he will confirm what Trump stated and also show Rudy went to the Ukraine on the DoJ tab. So we have a sitting government working on corruption investigations in a foreign country involving Americans.
Plus he wants to get to the bottom of some Ukrainian oligarch who the Mueller report stated was responsible for hacking the DNC server. LOL that is probably 'help' the Dimwits don't want.
And notice, this new President of Ukraine is going after corruption. Corruption the Dimwits have their finger prints all over. So he might just blow the cover off of this thing and that is why the Rats yesterday went to the mat, without evidence, to call for Trump's impeachment inquiry. They have to gag these investigations in the Ukraine because too many of them will be exposed. Lovely place Washington DC. Accuse someone else (Trump) of the very thing they are guilty of doing. Deep State indeed. Drain the swamp.
redleghunter posted on 2019-09-25 11:45:01 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: nolu chan (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-25 11:45:32 Reply Private Reply
#5: misterwhite To: nolu chan (#0)
"President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden s son, according to people familiar with the matter, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani on a probe that could hamper Mr. Trumps potential 2020 opponent."
-- WSJ 9/21/19
I counted once.
misterwhite posted on 2019-09-25 12:04:57 Reply Private Reply
#6: redleghunter To: misterwhite (#5)
We now know this is a lie. The transcript shows the Biden name once and the focus was on the fired Ukrainian prosecutor. There's enough in the transcript for the DemonRats to keep a pseudo aka fake narrative running with their news outlets for months.
But if they press, then they have to come to terms with Biden actually did what they accuse Trump of doing. Of course there will be no inquiry in that and even now the GOP Senate and DoJ has been silent other than Lady Lindsey calling for a probe.
redleghunter posted on 2019-09-25 12:24:35 Reply Private Reply
#7: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#0)
It'll be hilarious to watch them squirm under the weight of whatever bullshit candidate they barf up.
Hank Rearden posted on 2019-09-25 12:57:50 Reply Private Reply
#8: redleghunter To: Gatlin (#4)
Senate Republicans split over Trump urging Ukrainian leader to investigate Biden
redleghunter posted on 2019-09-25 14:09:27 Reply Private Reply
#9: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#0)
UKRAINE!
Oh, I guess it's another big fat nothingburger...never mind.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-09-25 14:20:15 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: redleghunter (#8)
I had not seen this.
I don't see this as a big deal in any way.
But I am concerned that some "Rs" may make it one.
It probably will pass the House - But never the Senate.
My guess ...
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-25 14:26:01 Reply Private Reply
#11: nolu chan To: Gatlin (#4)
There is nothing there to bother President Trump, but enough to make the DNC and Biden crap their pants. The exchange below is significant. President Trump brought up Crowdstrike and people saying Ukraine has the server.
Unsolicited, President Zelensky brought up Rudy Giuliani, and stated he would like Guiliani to travel to Ukraine so they could meet in person. On TV, Giuliani has been saying he has obtained a documented paper trail for $3M in funds routed to Hunter Biden via Ukraine, Latvia, Cyprus and onward to the United States. That raises a cousciousness of guilt issue. And President Zelensky promised that the investigation will get done.
Also note:
It would appear that President Trump and Guiliani may have struck the mother lode of evidence. I remain convinced that the DNC "hack" was a direct download performed on site. I doubt the Bidens can survive any serious investigation.
There is also the exchange about Joe Biden getting the investigation of Hunter Biden quashed.
It will be exceedingly difficult to maintain that President Zelensky succumbed to pressure. With Ukrainian cooperation, the Russia Hoax can be busted wide open.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 14:43:23 Reply Private Reply
#12: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#9)
The Trump aspect is a nothingburger. The Biden aspect is a treasure trove.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 14:49:46 Reply Private Reply
#13: nolu chan To: misterwhite (#5)
You did not use MSM math.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 14:54:46 Reply Private Reply
#14: nolu chan To: redleghunter (#6)
I don't think they can keep that as front page news and not have the Bidens as news along with it. They are more likely to treat this like Russiagate - drop it and run to a different synthetic crisis.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 14:58:45 Reply Private Reply
#15: misterwhite To: nolu chan (#12)
Which has been swept under the rug by the MSM and the Democrats for years. The MSM will continue to refuse to report it, and the Democrats will continue to refuse to prosecute it.
misterwhite posted on 2019-09-25 15:06:38 Reply Private Reply
#16: nolu chan To: Gatlin (#4)
Washington Post link
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 15:07:02 Reply Private Reply
#17: nolu chan To: misterwhite (#15)
They will try, but it is out there now, and it's a presidential election cycle and Biden is a candidate. Fun times ahead.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 15:12:33 Reply Private Reply
#18: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#12)
The solution is to discard Biden which is increasingly attractive to the Dems anyway. There may be some snide comparisons to Biden (and Obama) in their actions toward Ukraine and Biden's coke-sniffing son but libmedia has demonstrated it just won't report what it doesn't want to report.
Biden could be out of the race well before Iowa. I'll post a new thread on the polling. The Dems will quickly console their crucial black vote (solidly aligned behind Obama's VP) and move on to their preferred candidate.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-09-25 15:18:57 Reply Private Reply
#19: Tooconservative To: redleghunter (#8)
I predict that Lindsey Graham, an old impeachment House leader from the Xlinton era, will open a full Senate Judiciary investigation into Obama/Biden and Ukraine if the House files articles of impeachment on Trump. Imagine him calling Obama to testify. And Biden. And Biden's son. Just think of all the fun Lindsey Graham could have with that. Biden's son traveled on Air Force 2 to China to close a very large deal. More fodder for Lindsey.
The Dems and libmedia can talk impeachment all they want, they can open an "inquiry" (which is a complete nothing other than PR). Unless they vote articles of impeachment and send them to the Senate, it's all just talk. And Pelosi knows it.
Her key calculation has been whether it will hurt House Dems more in 2020 than it will help them. I'm not sure she ever was convinced that it wouldn't hurt House Dems but she came under so much pressure from the radical House Dems to start impeachment that she finally flipped a coin and caved in. I'd be surprised if she actually thinks it's a good idea.
She no doubt recalls that the Dems gained 5 seats in the '98 election, foiling Newt's promises that the GOP would gain seats. And the House GOP gave Newt his walking papers for that. Pelosi won't forget about that, no doubt she celebrated his downfall over those five Dem House victories and relished that for years. Now she has to be wondering if the end of her career could happen over an impeachment as well.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-09-25 15:28:04 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: nolu chan (#11)
Thanks ...
Gatlin posted on 2019-09-25 15:28:20 Reply Private Reply
#21: nolu chan To: Tooconservative, redleghunter (#19)
Good call.
Here is a set of tweets by Kimberley Strassel.
https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1176865141574340608
Kimberley Strassel G @KimStrassel
1) Having read DOJ's Trump-Ukraine release, here's the real story: This is another internal attempt to take out a president, on the basis of another nonsmoking-gun.
7:24 AM-25 Sep 2019
11,939 Retweets 30,670 Likes
2) As to call transcript itself: Trump's actual "favor" is that Ukraine look backward, to what happened in the 2016 election. This is a legitimate ask, since election meddling looks to have come from both Russia and Ukraine.
3) (lndeed, this is a big enough issue that we find out this morning that U.S. Attorney John Durham is looking at what role the Ukraine played in the FBI investigation.)
4) lt is actually Zelensky who brings up Rudy Giulianisaying they can't wait to "meet him." And it is Zelensky who references "that investigation," as he goes on to promise that "all investigations will be done openly and candidly."
5) Trump says "good" and expresses worries that a "good" prosecutor was "shut down." Mentions "Biden's son" and that Biden bragged he "stopped the prosecution." Ends that bit with "It sounds horrible to me."
6) Trump's several references to Giuliani are mostly to say what a great guy he is. He says he will have Giuliani and AG Barr call. He asks Zelensky to speak/work with both.
7) And, never mind, because: DOJ in statement says the President has not spoken to AG about investigating Biden and has not asked the AG to contact the Ukraine. Also, Barr has not communicated with Ukraine"on this or any subject."
8) Meanwhile, the IG back in August referred this to DOJ as potential violation of campaign finance law, based on whistleblower complaint. Criminal Division evaluated and determined no violation: "All relevant components of the Department agreed with this legal conclusion."
9) Whistleblower? Look at this nugget, referenced in the OLC opinion. The IG's review found some indicia of an arguable political bias on the part of the Complainant in favor of a rival political candidate."
10) Media got all this so wrong. And Democrats look all the more partisan and radical to have moved toward impeachment.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 16:05:23 Reply Private Reply
#22: WWG1WWA To: nolu chan (#11)
Don't know if you caught Ingraham last night, but Rudy said that he had seen the laundered check! Oops.
WWG1WWA posted on 2019-09-25 18:47:28 Reply Private Reply
#23: WWG1WWA To: nolu chan (#0)
WWG1WWA posted on 2019-09-25 18:50:50 Reply Private Reply
#24: paraclete To: nolu chan (#0)
paraclete posted on 2019-09-25 19:12:38 Reply Private Reply
#25: CZ82 To: All (#0)
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/05/crowdstrikeout_muell ers_own_report_undercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html
CZ82 posted on 2019-09-25 19:52:44 Reply Private Reply
#26: nolu chan To: WWG1WWA (#23)
I tried five different sources that would neither print nor download.
I used ABBYY Screenshot Reader to screen cap each page to the clipboard and used Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro to create one page PDFs from the clipboard. I then combined the five individual pages into a single PDF. For a text version, I used ABBYY Finereader 14 to convert the PDF to a Rich Text Format (RTF) file. Screenshot Reader is a seperate program that comes with Finereader OCR.
I hand code nearly all of my posts using a text editor called Jarte Plus. There is a freeware version called Jarte. Jarte Plus, featuring extra bells and whistles and customization, costs $20. Updates free. http://www.jarte.com/
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 20:07:52 Reply Private Reply
#27: nolu chan To: CZ82 (#25)
The best forensic computer analysis I have seen provides compelling evidence that the DNC was not a hack but an onsite download, probably to a thumb drive. The metadata time stamps of the successive files enable derivation of the download speed at which the files were copied. The speed was too fast for an internet hack.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 20:20:19 Reply Private Reply
#28: nolu chan To: WWG1WWA (#22)
Yes, I caught Ingraham last night. Rudy was still on fire today and appears to have some goods to deliver.
Here's an interesting tidbit from Sara Carter:
https://saraacarter.com/white-house-transcript-of-trump-convo-with-ukrainian-president-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-25 20:34:33 Reply Private Reply
#29: CZ82 To: nolu chan (#27)
I've seen the same information too and it's been out there for quite sometime now. And for the most part the MSM is (of course) not covering that subject, gotta keep the good little drones all fired up and on board with Trump/Russia collusion.
I'm assuming Trump thinks Zelensky can be trusted to get to the bottom of who all is involved with this mess/scam, time will tell. But I imagine this little tidbit of information getting out will put some folks into a tizzy, the next few weeks/months could get to be very interesting to see what all falls out of the tree.
CZ82 posted on 2019-09-26 08:26:12 Reply Private Reply
#30: nolu chan To: CZ82 (#29)
If the Crowdstrike fable falls, the Russia hoax would be revealed as an intelligence operation. It would explain the Mueller farce and why it avoided the genesis of the data leak. Such criminal misconduct revealed in a presidential cycle would be shattering to the responsible political party.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 11:03:02 Reply Private Reply
#31: CZ82 To: nolu chan (#30)
Very true (can you say "it would all lead back to Obama") and would lead to a whole lot of other investigations they wouldn't want to happen either.
Word is this has been sitting on "Pencilnecks" desk for over a month and they waited till now to unleash it to distract from the speech he gave at the UN. My guess is they weren't counting on Trump releasing the transcript that mentioned Crowdstrike and now they find themselves between a rock and a hard place. (If Nancy is smart she will find a way to sit on this before it all blows up on them, which I hope it does).
This whole thing is basically just your typical "Democrats are guilty of doing this but are projecting this onto the opposition" to distract the average citizen/voter from the truth. This is also going to turn into a biweekly/monthly "faux" revelation about how much of a traitor Trump is all the way up to the election next year, it's going to get very amusing I think.
CZ82 posted on 2019-09-26 15:10:53 Reply Private Reply
#32: nolu chan To: CZ82 (#31)
It is addressed to Reps. Burr and Schiff.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 15:46:12 Reply Private Reply
#33: nolu chan To: CZ82 (#31)
Uhh, yeah. His name is Seth Rich.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 15:47:04 Reply Private Reply
#34: nolu chan To: A K A Stone, Hank Rearden, redleghunter, Gatlin, misterwhite, WWG1WWA, CZ82 (#0)
https://twitter.com/AndrewHClark/status/1176925242436050944
The link goes to a Twitter thread with video clips of various network (CNN/FOX/MSNBC) examples skipping past over 500 words of the transcript to connect "favor" with "There's a lot of talk about Biden's son...."
FAKE NEWS
https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/25/cnn-just-yadda-yadda-yaddad-540-words-to-frame-trump-for-favor-he-never-requested/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Here is the actual transcript with the omitted 540 words in strikeout:
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 15:51:53 Reply Private Reply
#35: nolu chan To: WWG1WWA (#22)
btw, Hunter Biden was not in business by himself. Also hooked up with Hunter Biden were Chris Heinz and James Bulger. Those would be John Kerry's stepson and Whitey Bulger's nephew.
John Durham was the special counsel who freed four men wrongly convicted (Weissman involved) and he obtained the indictment of Whitey Bulger.
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 15:58:53 Reply Private Reply
#36: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#35)
Given how long he's been operating there, I would expect that Baby Brzezinski is involved too. Zbigniew's son has been there, up to his neck in it, in Ukraine for decades.
Tooconservative posted on 2019-09-26 18:15:31 Reply Private Reply
#37: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#36)
https://www.scribd.com/document/427634974/United-States-v-Roger-Stone-DCDC-19-cr-18-Doc-223-26-Sep-2019-DCCC-Notice-Re-Filing-of-Supplemental-Exhibits
nolu chan posted on 2019-09-26 19:39:44 Reply Private Reply
#38: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#37)
I notice that CrowdStrike's services are described as "legal services".
Which means they're trying to hide behind attorney-client confidentiality.
That's about the only thing we can learn from that highly blacked-out document.
I'd say chances are good they can stall this right past the 2020 election by tying it up in a sympathetic court's docket.
If the GOP is going to move, they need to do it ASAP. The closer we get to any primary or the 2020 election, the more the courts will want to avoid the public seeing them play any role and they'll just stall it until after it's all over. Which is what the Dems want.
Too bad the Dems can't just run to the Ninth Circus now like they did for so many years. They'll never forgive Trump for putting his appointees on that court. LOL
Tooconservative posted on 2019-09-26 19:54:00 Reply Private Reply
#39: CZ82 To: nolu chan (#33)
Don't know if you've seen this or not:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/seth-rich-murder-update-fbi-claims- they-didnt-investigate-but-nsa-claims-cant-disclose-files-due-to-matter-of- national-security/
CZ82 posted on 2019-09-27 06:46:06 Reply Private Reply