The aTTack of The

AmpuTaTed unarmed apes

Invincibles Too

Love
boris

Instead, the angry young animal felt he needed to attack. Unfortunately, he attacked the wrong person.

You recall that he knew he was being followed and he did go back to his mother's condo while Zimmerman was down the bloc, looking around. But then he left the condo to go back and attack Zimmerman. That is not the normal teen behavior unless they're an experienced gang member. Normal American teens don't attack adults but young thugs do.

You recall how the libs got a narrative going about wee Traybon!, a tyke who liked Skittles who got gunned down by a Peruvian supremacist.

After the professional weeping and lynch mobs started to form, we saw crap like this:

RuleOfWolves: A Tale of Two Trayvons, 7/27/13

A Tale of Two Trayvons Attorneys and Law Professors Commenting on the Zimmerman Trial Relied on a False Narrative of Events, Mined With Inaccurate Facts, and Almost Caused a Wrongful Conviction The failure of Professor Ford to acknowledge the factual errors in his New Republic article and voluntarily correct them is disturbing.  Had he based the conclusions of an academic law review article on such inaccurate, uncited facts he would be guilty of sloppy scholarship at best and academic dishonesty at worst.  The controversy created by the New Republic´s delay in correcting the factual errors in Professor Ford´s article is only one of numerous instances where lawyers and law professors either intentionally or negligently relied on a false narrative of events mined with factual errors when writing or commenting about Zimmerman´s prosecution.  Slate´[ Emily Bazelon, The Nation´s Patricia J. Williams, as well as others, have drawn conclusions about the case based on  incorrect facts that go uncorrected when the correct facts are either pointed out to them or become obvious through an examination of the trial court record.  The worst offenders, by far, have been the attorneys representing the Martin family. After the verdict, Martin family attorney Daryl Parks still described Trayvon Martïn as ¨a small Black child." The misleading description of Trayvon Martin, in conjunction with the constant use of the old photograph of Trayvon as a 14-year-old boy, has been the centerpiece of a false narrative that almost resulted in a wrongful conviction.  During the trial, one of George Zimmerman´[ neighbors testified that she believed that - of the two people she saw involved in the struggle on her street - Trayvon Martin was the one on the bottom being beaten. On cross examination, the witness conceded that her testimony was based on her assumption that Trayvon Martin was a small black child. The basis for her assumption was the photograph she had repeatedly seen in the media of Trayvon Martin as a 14-year old boy. In fact, Trayvon Martin was not a small Black child. He was a strong, lean and fit young man. At seventeen, with his parent[ permission, he could have enlisted in the military and trained to be a combat soldier. In a physical confrontation, out-of-shape butterball George Zimmerman was no match for the athletic 17-year-old. After the verdict, while appearing on the Greta Van Susteren show, Martin family attorney Jasmine Rand was confronted with her continued promotion of an inaccurate narrative of events that had been discredited by the evidence introduced at trial. She defended herself by noting that she was not just an attorney, but was also a ¨social engineer.¨  In the field of sociology, the term ¨social engineer" is just another word for professional propagandist.  Social propaganda campaigns, throughout history, have almost universally been more concerned with the effectiveness of the message than with the truthfulness of the facts underlying the message.  Lawyers and law professors are not supposed to be ¨social engineers¨ when it comes to the administration of justice in a criminal trial. Their education and training in the concepts of due process, the presumption of innocence and the rule of law, as well as their status as officers of the court, confer upon them a moral obligation to communicate information about a pending criminal trial accurately and fairly.  When attorneys and law professors fail to live up to this obligation they only damage the credibility of a jury system that is the last bulwark of defense between a poor criminal defendant and the danger of a maliciously motivated wrongful conviction based on police and prosecutorial misconduct. Trayvon Martin at 14, three years before his confrontation with George Zimmerman. Trayvon Martin at 17, his age at the time of his confrontation with George Zimmerman

Here's another young Traybon spreading joy in the 'hood.

Traybon's handle was @NO_LIMIT_NIGGA and it is alleged he did punch a bus driver like the above GIF shortly before he was executed for buying Skittles.

Speaking of Skittles:

I notice it isn't so easy to find any pic of Traybon! flashing gang signs now. It seems someone made most of those disappear.

And here is the final outcome of his budding thuggery, a photo of the wee lad Traybon! rarely seen at the time.

Tattooing, gold "grill" (dental work), gang signs, stocking caps and baseball caps worn backward, gang hoodies, obvious signs of drug use on social media, other young thugs in training giving him credz for sucker-punching a bus driver...yes, a fine young Afro-American.

As you can see, I didn't care for the media narrative that libmedia tried to cram down our throats. Traybon is the original major social media lynch mob that formed and attempted to turn the subsequent trial into a kangaroo court. I'll be waiting to grab a copy of this documentary.

Unfortunately, he attacked the wrong person.

Yep. And broke the cardinal rule -- never go one-on-one with whitey. Always attack in packs.

Not even a gunfight with a paunchy street-stupid half-Peruvian suburban liberal.

If I were Trayvon Martin’s parents or his family’s attorneys, I would be very nervous right now. If I were Florida state attorneys who prosecuted the case, I would be more nervous still. And if I were the media who covered this case — are you listening Matt Gutman and Lisa Bloom? — I would prepare to be mortified.

Yeah, right. This story ends right here; nothing is ever done, nobody is ever even arrested much less prosecuted, no matter how much is "exposed".

The Trayvon Hoax That Divided America Is About to Be Exposed

No,it's not.

In an ideal world,with a press that exists to actually report the news,the truth would be publicized,but not in 21st Century 'murika where ALL the national news outlets are only owned by a handful of people,all of who are globalists pushing a globalist agenda.

Anybody that thinks the major news outlets are going to publish the actual facts of this story at this late date is delusional. For one thing they would have to admit their reporting was wrong on the original story,and that ain't going to happen.

For another,there is no way in HELL they are going to kill a story that is based on "de ebil white mans dun be kill-in de little brudder who wuz just want-tin sum candy!"

" Ain’t no “hoax” about it. Had he acted a little more white (aka CIVIL) when approached by neighborhood watch, he’d be still alive today.

Instead, the angry young animal felt he needed to attack. Unfortunately, he attacked the wrong person. "

EXACTLY !!!!

Punk got what he needed ! Good bye to bad rubbish !!