They're totally out of control. Totes.

AGW’s two-ton vehicle ...

Ooooh. A two-ton vehicle! That's lower than the weight of the average mid- size SUV.

Here’s local news coverage about a teenage kid in Hollywood, FL ...popping wheelies on his bicycle.

Only a story because the kids were black.

Cops were investigating a string of robberies in that area. When an officer approached them for questioning, the boys split up and fled the scene. That's why he was chased.

(The mother later defended her son's actions by saying "... you can’t blame the children for being afraid of the police.")

No, mama. I blame YOU for teaching your children to be afraid of the police. That's getting them killed.

Back when this was a free country, a cop who spotted a kid doing a wheelie would have given him a smile and a thumbs-up.

This story had nothing to do with wheelies.

It's no different than all your other stories -- "Cops Shoot Man For Smoking Cigarette", "Cops Arrest Woman For Wearing a Green Dress", "Cops Beat Up Teen For Singing Too Loud".

This is why you'll always be a joke on this forum.

This story had nothing to do with wheelies.

Really? That's what the new report is saying. And no - it's not from the Free Thought Project.

Cops were investigating a string of robberies in that area...

Yeah, because hardened criminals attempt to "escape the scene of the crime" by doing wheelies.

Really? That's what the new report is saying.

What new report? An inflammatory article by an anarchist's website?

"Yeah, because hardened criminals attempt to "escape the scene of the crime" by doing wheelies."

Actually one did, didn't he? Didn't get far. Fall down go boom.

What new report? An inflammatory article by an anarchist's website?

News report - the video - ABC.

The article itself is from a cars and automotive site.

Keep licking them jackboots paulsen.

The article itself is from a cars and automotive site.

Give it up, already - libertarian dumb ass ...

It's no different than all your other stories -- "Cops Shoot Man For Smoking Cigarette", "Cops Arrest Woman For Wearing a Green Dress", "Cops Beat Up Teen For Singing Too Loud".

I must have missed some of Deckard's articles. Do you have links? These sound like fine articles.

What have you ever posted from Eric’s site that was about cars and automotive information and not only about cop-hating or anti-government articles?

Eric does write about one article a year about the auto industry. Other than that, it's just his personal political blog pretending to be auto-oriented.

I must have missed some of Deckard's articles.

You have not missed anything.

"Do you have links? These sound like fine articles."

Don't waste your time. I mean, the headline says it all, right? What more is there to learn?

The article itself is from a cars and automotive site.

What have yo ever posted from Eric’s site that was about cars and automotive information ?

Good grief, have you really become that senile?

I've posted several including at least two that you read and commented on.

Eric does write about one article a year about the auto industry. Other than that, it's just his personal political blog pretending to be auto-oriented.

Actually the vast amount of articles are about cars - his the political section is relatively small.

Sometimes the political issues involve cars - sometimes the car issues are political.

You and Gatlin should both check that out for yourselves.

... Gatlin should both check that out ...

I have and you are – as always – posting some more Bullshit.

What the hell do you want everyone to think “libertarian car talk” is?

Eric Peters is a libertarian using his “car web site” as a personal blog to promote his libertarian views on politics.

And you take the hate-cops and anti-government articles from there to post on LF wanting us to believe they are isolated independent political objective commentaries from some “car guy.”

"Politics Archives - EPautos - Libertarian Car Talk - Eric Peters Autos"

“Libertarian Car Talk” !!!

Laughing my ass off …

...Gatlin check that out ...

Hey, Deckard, what does this tell everyone?

“Eric Peters@LibertarianCarG”

“Eric Peters is a Libertarian gearhead, columnist, and author.”

A “libertarian columnist and author” – GET IT ???

Post your articles, of course, and we will comment on them.

But. for heavens sake, STOP LYING about your sources.

They are what they are …

The only thing worse than a liar is a deceitful libertarian liar.

...Gatlin check that out ...

“Eric Peters is a freelance Anarcho-Libertarian writer, who uses cars and bikes as the vehicle for making the case for freedom and self-ownership.”
https://mises.org/profile/eric- peters

Read those word very CAREFULLY, Deckard.

Here, I will help you to better understand: It says that Eric Peters MASKS his case for libertarian freedom and self-ownership by using cars and bikes as the vehicle.

You GOT it now???

Actually the vast amount of articles are about cars - his the political section is relatively small.

Here at LF, we're lucky to see one article a year from Eric which is about cars.

I guess we can blame you for creating this impression of Eric's writing.

What a novel notion, blame Deckard for everything. So new, so unusual here at LF.

Peace out. Enjoy your weekend.

What a novel notion, blame Deckard for everything. So new, so unusual here at LF.

Sure seems like Gatlin has a personal vendetta against anything that smacks of liberty.

I post from libertarian sites - he poats from leftist-commie sites.

And I'm the bad guy? Go figure.

Peace out. Enjoy your weekend.

Hope yours went well too.

Here at LF, we're lucky to see one article a year from Eric which is about cars.

Sometimes the lines are blurred between politics and cars.

Yeah, that must really chap your wrinkled ass that someone writes about freedom and self-ownership.

Mayne you can get Google and Facebook to ban his site for posting his opinions.

Apparently - they scare you.

Yeah, that must really chap your wrinkled ass that someone writes about freedom and self-ownership.

I do however find it quite amusing – well laughable – about the way libertarians think they own the term and adhere to the false libertarian notion of self-ownership.

Libertarians support the idea that a government’s only purpose is to protect life, liberty and private property. One way this is done is through an idea they call self-ownership. This is the notion that each individual owns himself, just like one who owns a piece of property. Thus, the government should have no say on what we do with ourselves.

David Boaz in his book, The Libertarian Mind, expresses this principle in the following way: “The right of self-ownership,” he says, “certainly implies the right to decide for ourselves what food, drink, or drugs we will put into our own bodies; with whom we will make love (assuming our chosen partner agrees); and what kind of medical treatment we want (assuming a doctor agrees to provide it).”

This idea of “medical treatment” would certainly include the right to suicide. This is very much of an issue for those living in California, since Governor Brown just signed an assisted suicide law there.

This self-ownership extends not just to our bodies, but to our minds as well. Thus, classical liberal author John Stuart Mills wrote: “Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.”

Hence, they believe in absolute freedom of thought and freedom of expression, including the right to any form of pornography. The only limit to their view of freedom over oneself is when someone engages in an activity that denies rights to another person.

Learn All About the Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our TimesThe False Libertarian Notion of Self-Ownership It should be mentioned that their notion of denying rights to others is very short-sighted. Who could deny that an individual who decides to become a drug user denies the rights of those with whom he associates? Think here of husbands, wives, children and family members who will have the weight of dealing with a drug user thrust on their shoulders.

This notion of self-ownership means that libertarians are very individualistic. For them, their self-interest is more important than the common good. That is why they are opposed to military conscription. They consider the draft to be a form of slavery.

Included in this notion is the idea that the only purpose of society is to help the individual. They have no concept of a higher purpose for society, of a society of greater value than the individuals in that society. If you disagree, they disparage you as a “communitarian.”

Boaz expresses this in the following words: “Communitarians in modern America” he says: “are people who believe that ‘the community’ should in some way take precedence over the individual.”

Thus, they harshly criticized John McCain when he called on Americans to serve “a national purpose that is greater than our individual interests.” Boaz even goes so far as to claim, “civil society itself is not an organization and does not have a purpose of its own.”