Liberty's Flame

#1: Hank Rearden To: Deckard (#0)

LOL Loons will always be with us. Let's keep them at a distance.

Hank Rearden posted on 2019-05-16 10:09:00 Reply Private Reply

#2: Deckard To: Liberator (#0)

Thought this might interest you.

Deckard posted on 2019-05-16 10:10:28 Reply Private Reply

#3: jeremiad To: Deckard (#0)

No NO, really they just shot some film on Earth for practice, then some on the moon after they got there. I don't know how they shielded the film from the radiation during the travel, but in 1969 technology was much more advanced than it is today.

jeremiad posted on 2019-05-16 13:40:54 Reply Private Reply

#4: Hank Rearden To: jeremiad (#3)

1969 technology was much more advanced than it is today.

That's for sure. Back then, we were going to the Moon, over and over.
Now we can't even put our own guys into Earth orbit.

Hank Rearden posted on 2019-05-17 13:38:25 Reply Private Reply

#5: Liberator To: Deckard (#2)

Ha...just now noticing this. Thanks. I've seen volumes of material that totally debunk the moon landing and even the ISS.

And yet, there will still be millions of detractors who insist:

"But..but...They told us we went FIVE TIMES!!...the photos...the flag on the moon...the TV broadcast...the moon rocks...playing golf...the moon buggy...Neil Armstrong....etc."

Liberator posted on 2019-05-20 18:33:50 Reply Private Reply

#6: Liberator To: jeremiad (#3)

In 1969 technology was much more advanced than it is today.

With all due respect, please re-think the sense of above statement.

Liberator posted on 2019-05-20 18:34:48 Reply Private Reply

#7: Liberator To: Hank Rearden (#4)

Never went, bro.

Guys from NASA even admit it can't be done. And that's with today's tech that's a gazillion times more advanced.

Liberator posted on 2019-05-20 18:36:43 Reply Private Reply

#8: goldilucky To: Liberator (#7)

Guys from NASA even admit it can't be done.

Can you quote me which one made this statement? Was it Buzz Aldrin?

goldilucky posted on 2019-05-20 22:36:27 Reply Private Reply

#9: Hank Rearden To: Liberator (#7)

Never went, bro.

I was immersed in the space program then and for some time afterward.

They went.

Hank Rearden posted on 2019-05-21 10:24:56 Reply Private Reply

#10: misterwhite To: Deckard (#0)

That is embarrassingly bad.

misterwhite posted on 2019-05-21 11:00:24 Reply Private Reply

#11: Liberator To: goldilucky, Hank Rearden, jeremiad, misterwhite, Deckard (#8)

Can you quote me which one made this statement? Was it Buzz Aldrin?

Ol' Buzz fesses up to a small child.

Liberator posted on 2019-05-22 10:08:40 Reply Private Reply

#12: Liberator To: Hank Rearden (#9)

Did you work at NASA? (Or for the space program in some capacity?)

Liberator posted on 2019-05-22 10:09:12 Reply Private Reply

#13: misterwhite To: Hank Rearden (#9)

I was immersed in the space program then and for some time afterward.

I went to college to get my engineering degree to be part of the early space program. By the time I graduated, NASA was winding down lunar landings and were laying off people.

misterwhite posted on 2019-05-22 10:18:10 Reply Private Reply

#14: Hank Rearden To: Liberator (#12)

No, private aerospace company, as did my father who worked on the Surveyor program to do the scouting before we landed men on the Moon. Which we did.

I don't understand why so many are so willing to soak up nonsense to deny a magnificent achievement by mankind.
It's like saying the ancient Egyptians couldn't possibly build the pyramids, so obviously it must have been aliens.

Hank Rearden posted on 2019-05-22 11:13:24 Reply Private Reply

#15: Liberator To: Hank Rearden (#14)

I don't understand why so many are so willing to soak up nonsense to deny a magnificent achievement by mankind.

Maybe because the Space Program "achievements" and "science" are not only unproven, but clearly debunked? Our history also has been tampered with and hidden. (I know we will disagree on this theory.)

No, private aerospace company, as did my father who worked on the Surveyor program to do the scouting before we landed men on the Moon. Which we did.

Well, that would explain your firm position on the matter. Nothing will change your mind. Nor mine. I respect your opinion and the engineering work you and dad have done.

For the record regarding my opinion, I believe 99% of those who'd worked at NASA and different aerospace companies had/have all the confidence in the world that their goal and mission was accomplished with all sincerity and skill, and their jobs completed and done according to specs...

That said, the problem is...once your/their legit task was completed -- and due to compartmentalization -- they then handed off the ball to those relative few tasked with the "Final Steps."

Liberator posted on 2019-05-22 11:36:06 Reply Private Reply

#16: Liberator To: Hank Rearden (#14)

It's like saying the ancient Egyptians couldn't possibly build the pyramids, so obviously it must have been aliens.

They couldn't have. And didn't. As an engineer you should realize this. No, it wasn't "Aliens" who helped build them, BUT...close.

I have researched this subject for truth as well, but you and most wouldn't believe this truth of the matter either. The truth to our history is hidden and locked away by the elites (In the restricted bowels of the Vatican catacombs for instance.) And even when our history isn't hidden, its distorted, fabricated, and contrived. That is exactly what going on before our very eyes today as the MSM substitutes lies for truth and those IT deems "evil."

Liberator posted on 2019-05-22 11:41:11 Reply Private Reply

#17: Liberator To: misterwhite, Hank Rearden (#13)

By the time I graduated, NASA was winding down lunar landings and were laying off people.

Didn't it seem strange to you that NASA didn't send back THOUSANDS of photos and videos of the earth from the moon?

Or...

Didn't use its supposed lunar missions to set up some kind of moon base?

Or...

Didn't use their knowledge of space travel and landing to extend their next Mission to Mars?

Why suddenly scuttle the entire NASA project??

Liberator posted on 2019-05-22 11:49:52 Reply Private Reply

#18: misterwhite To: Liberator (#17)

Why suddenly scuttle the entire NASA project??

Once we beat the Russians and landed on the moon, public interest (read: money) waned. NASA's mission changed to the construction and maintenance of a space station.

misterwhite posted on 2019-05-22 12:12:12 Reply Private Reply

#19: jeremiad To: Liberator (#6)

It was sarcasm. Obviously though, if we could do it in the late 1960's it should be easy and safe enough for there to be at least tourism flights to the satellite.

jeremiad posted on 2019-05-22 19:48:36 Reply Private Reply

#20: Hank Rearden To: Liberator (#17)

Why suddenly scuttle the entire NASA project??

misterwhite answered you correctly. Political priorities and Watergate assured attention was shifted elsewhere once the Russians were put in their place. And Jimmy Carter was focused on wrecking the economy.

Hank Rearden posted on 2019-05-23 11:39:35 Reply Private Reply

Source:	YouTube
Published:	May 8, 2019
Author:	WeAreAllGnosis 333
Post Date:	2019-05-16 09:35:21 by Deckard
Views:	4860

Wikileaks releases unused footage of moon landing showing it was REALLY filmed in Nevada desert...