Breaking: The House Just Passed A SECOND Extreme Gun Control Bill

Source: Organic Prepper
Published: Feb 28, 2019
Author: Dagny Taggart
Post Date: 2019-02-28 20:19:03 by Hondo68
Views: 2955

For the second day in a row, gun-grabbers in the US House of Representatives have passed an extreme gun control bill.

Yesterday we reported that the House of Representatives voted to pass H.R. 8, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019, which would require background checks for all firearm sales, including private transactions and purchases made online and at gun shows. Currently, only federally licensed firearms dealers, importers, and manufacturers are required to conduct background checks on customers under federal law.

We also reported that the House would be voting on another gun control bill this week – H.R. 1112, the Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2019, which has been nicknamed the “Charleston Loophole” bill:

That bill would extend the amount of time firearms dealers must wait for a response from the background check system before the sale can proceed to 20 days. Currently, they can make the sale if they haven’t received a response in three days. (source)

The National Rifle Association (NRA) warned that H.R. 1112 is “worse” than H.R. 8:

Under that bill, gun sales from licensed dealers would be subject to the discretion of federal officials. Through either malice or incompetence, the legislation creates an unworkable system where gun buyers could be placed in an endless loop of background checks and would never actually receive the firearms they wish to purchase. (source)

Today, the House voted to pass H.R. 1112 on a largely party-line vote of 228 to 198.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, a survivor of domestic violence, attempted to amend the bill to keep the three-day time limit on background checks for domestic violence victims trying to buy a gun, reports USA Today:

“Do we really want to tell victims of domestic violence they have to wait up to 20 business days,” the Arizona Republican asked, “before they are allowed to adequately defend themselves?” (source)

The NRA published a statement in response to the vote, which reads:

“The anti-gun politicians in the House of Representatives continue to employ the shameful tactic of exploiting tragedies to market gun control that won’t prevent criminals from committing murder. It’s a sham and the Charleston Loophole bill is the perfect example of their dishonesty. The assertion that a supposed 10-day delay would have prevented a crime that took place over 60 days after the initial delay is ridiculous. This legislation would not have prevented the Charleston murders, and even worse, the legislation is so poorly drafted it would put law-abiding citizens who need a firearm for self-defense at risk by trapping them in an endless loop of delays. The NRA will continue to fight for the constitutional right of law-abiding Americans to defend themselves and their families without apology.” (source)

The Republican-controlled Senate is very unlikely to pass the bill, and as we reported yesterday, President Trump would likely veto it anyway:

In a statement, the White House announced it opposed the bills for violating Second Amendment rights.

“The extensive regulation required by H.R. 8 is incompatible with the Second Amendment’s guarantee of an individual right to keep arms,” the statement reads. “By overly extending the minimum time that a licensed entity is required to wait for background check results, H.R. 1112 would unduly impose burdensome delays on individuals seeking to purchase a firearm.”

The two bills are expected to pass in the House, but would then need to be approved in the Senate, where Republicans hold a majority. In its statement, the White House suggested President Trump would veto both pieces of legislation if they pass the House and Senate.

The gun grabbers are NOT going to stop.

The gun grabbers in Congress are not going to stop trying to take away our rights. They will continue to chip away with insidious measures. We will see continued efforts to diminish our rights.

And the worst thing is, they’ll call it “common sense” measures. Terminology like that sets it up so that anyone who objects is a nutcase. It makes it seem as though those of us who demand our rights be unfettered are fringe lunatics instead of self-reliant, law-abiding citizens.

This bill may not pass this Senate. If they pass it, President Trump will most likely veto it.

But this is a sign of things to come. They’re not going to stop and imagine if we have a gun grabber in the White House.

They ARE coming for our guns. Don’t let anyone fool you.


Poster Comment:

We have a gun grabber in the White House. "Take The Guns First" Trump.

If he's re-elected, it's Amnesty & Gun Confiscations. Lame duck, the gloves are off. Destroy America is job #1.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: IbJensen    To: hondo68 (#0)

We have a gun grabber in the White House.

Well it's certainly not the president!

The Democrat Communist Party is on it's way to the scrap heap of history along with the many RINOs.

IbJensen posted on 2019-02-28 22:31:05   Reply   Private Reply


#2: paraclete    To: hondo68 (#0)

So what you are saying is some politicians had the guts to ignore the NRA and opt for a checking process that might work, but it is a piric victory because they know it won't pass the Senate so Trump can sign it

paraclete posted on 2019-02-28 23:21:25   Reply   Private Reply


#3: Hondo68    To: paraclete, Take The Guns First, Bill Of Love, amnesty (#2)

Trump will sign it after the election, even if he loses. Got a couple of months before the inauguration, about the third week of January 2021.

Trump has declared his desire to "Take The Guns" but he's afraid to sign legislation until after the 2020 election. He's for Bill of Love amnesty but can't do it right now for the same reason. Americans hate both.

Hondo68 posted on 2019-02-28 23:31:15   Reply   Private Reply


#4: GrandIsland    To: paraclete (#2)

Don’t worry about our constitutional rights. Stay in fag UK, and worry about fighting for the rights of towelheads, the gunless knife owners... and all those Britt pickle kissers.

GrandIsland posted on 2019-03-01 06:41:36   Reply   Private Reply


#5: sneakypete    To: hondo68 (#3)

Trump has declared his desire to "Take The Guns" but he's afraid to sign legislation until after the 2020 election. He's for Bill of Love amnesty but can't do it right now for the same reason. Americans hate both.

Don't worry your pretty little head about it,missy. You are wrong.

sneakypete posted on 2019-03-01 10:00:16   Reply   Private Reply


#6: A K A Stone    To: GrandIsland (#4)

He is from Australia. And he is a decent guy.

A K A Stone posted on 2019-03-01 10:06:24   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Gatlin    To: A K A Stone (#6)

Excellent posts.

I stand with you in FULL SUPPORT of Israel.

Fuck Deckard and hondope for promoting anti-Israel bullshit.

Gatlin posted on 2019-03-01 10:15:19   Reply   Private Reply


#8: Tooconservative    To: hondo68 (#0)

Interesting that the GOP managed to insert an amendment that ICE is to be notified whenever an illegal tries to buy a gun (about 10 per day). This was defeated in Judiciary committee when they worked this bill but the GOP managed to add it back in on a motion to recommit and it passed the House.

26 Dems voted for it, nearly all who come from districts won by a handful of votes and that voted Trump in 2016.

Pelosi could not have been happy.

DailyCaller: The 26 Democrats Who Voted To Pass ICE Amendment In New Gun Bill

Tooconservative posted on 2019-03-01 10:26:38   Reply   Private Reply


#9: Gatlin    To: sneakypete (#5)

You are wrong.
Nothing unusual about that.

He always is …

Gatlin posted on 2019-03-01 10:45:57   Reply   Private Reply


#10: IbJensen    To: All (#1)

Well it's certainly not the president! The Democrat Communist Party is on it's way to the scrap heap of history along with the many RINOs.

I should have added they won't grab guns.....one way or the OTHER!

IbJensen posted on 2019-03-01 11:15:40   Reply   Private Reply


#11: GrandIsland    To: A K A Stone (#6)

Australia was UK’s dumping ground for their rapist and most deviant criminals. He/she is as libtarded as it gets,he/she feels he/she should have a fucking opinion regarding MY constitutional rights, from Australia... and you call that a “decent poster”?

You must be running for political office. lol

GrandIsland posted on 2019-03-01 17:57:09   Reply   Private Reply


#12: Gatlin    To: A K A Stone, GrandIsland, Buckeroo (#6)

He is from Australia.

How do you know that? Because he says he is? And because he uses an IP address in Australia?

Anyone can just say they are Australian and anyone can then get an IP address in Australia to post from.

Look:

How to Get an Australian IP Address from Anywhere in 2019
Oh, he makes good posts. But isn’t the fact that an Aussie takes such an intense, I mealy REALLY intense, interest in discussing American politics and that he just HAPPENED to find LF unusual?
Look at the definition of Paraclete:
Paraclete definition: An advocate or intercessor.
Who or what is he a “advocate” for?
Look at the definition of intercessor:
Intercessor: A person who intervenes on behalf of another.
Who is he intervening on behalf of?
One should listen when someone is trying to tell you WHO they are.
Paraphrasing: Of all the chit-chat sites in the world, he just stumbled into yours.

Wow !!!!

I will leave you with this:

Deceiver -
Your ass tells you you need to fart, gotta let one go, and right now. Upon sphincter relaxation, you discover the backlog in there wasn't all just the 3rd state of matter. Nope. There was some liquid, and some solid, too. You have been...deceived. And you need to change your shorts, at a minimum.
"Where's Bob?"
"He went home to change his clothes. It was urgent."
"What happened?"
"Well he was in a meeting, and just had to fart, or so his ass promised him. Massive pressure. He finally lets 'er go. Well it turns out he shat some, too; he was deceived by his own ass into thinking it was just gas, but it had mass".
"Deceiver!"
"Yes, filthy deceiving ass. Never trust a fart!"
"Amen to that, brother."
I say the biggest communication problem on a forum is “that we read to reply” and not try to understand who is doing what and for what reason.

Always remember, Stone, to never trust a fart …

Gatlin posted on 2019-03-02 04:10:57   Reply   Private Reply


#13: paraclete    To: GrandIsland (#11)

Australia was UK’s dumping ground for their rapist and most deviant criminals. He/she is as libtarded as it gets,he/she feels he/she should have a fucking opinion regarding MY constitutional rights, from Australia... and you call that a “decent poster”?

Have to call bullshit on that one, and remember before Australia was used as a dumping ground for the disadvantaged and disaffected of the British Isles, they were sent to america. I have an opinion because whatever dickhead ideas you get over there seem to surface in Australia shortly after.

You need to get a clear view on history, there are more rapists and deviants in america than there are in Australia

paraclete posted on 2019-03-03 19:48:53   Reply   Private Reply


#14: paraclete    To: GrandIsland (#4)

Don’t worry about our constitutional rights. Stay in fag UK, and worry about fighting for the rights of towelheads, the gunless knife owners... and all those Britt pickle kissers.

I don't live in the UK, so know nothing about that. I don't worry about you, I feel sorry for you, you brainwashed idiot

paraclete posted on 2019-03-03 19:50:34   Reply   Private Reply