I loath weakness.

Still, it's stupid for the gov to try to bleed money out of this Good Samaritan type.

The buck may have better off on its feet, in the wild.

The buck either is strong enough to survive ON ITS OWN... or it’s food for another species. There is no compassion when it comes to a species surviving. Compassion is a weakness... and the tree hugging fucking fruit that interfered with nature, should be kicked in his nut sack until his nose bleeds OR he mentally toughens up.

The use of “good samaritan“ is just weak compassion libtard white-wash to make the sheep feel bad for the tree hugger and hate for government. That’s called YELLA journalism.

The use of “good samaritan“ is just weak compassion libtard white-wash to make the sheep feel bad for the tree hugger and hate for government.

Attaboy psycho! Keep up the deranged rants.

That is just dumb.

There is nothing wrong with rescuing a deer.

I rescued a raccoon once. A baby one on a job. We kept it for a pet for a few weeks before releasing it in the wild.

I rescued a raccoon once. A baby one on a job. We kept it for a pet for a few weeks before releasing it in the wild.

And it later died because you enabled it to rely on another. You were it’s EBT card.

Compassion isn't a weakness. It is a virtue.

That is just dumb.

Kindness is also a “virtue”... but given to the wrong person, is a weakness. Like picking up a hitchhiker... and 5 minutes into the ride, you’re shot in the head. A week later, the hitchhiker is staying at a motel ordering pizza... from the cash of your wallet.

Don’t be dumb.

For every coon squashed in the road by a car, a new coon is born. Same in the urban jungle.

It didn't die on my watch

I gotta ask... why is that important? It’s a freaking wild animal, lower on the food chain than you... with a life expectancy of 2-3 years in the wild. Do you think a shark (who in the ocean is higher on the food chain than you) would nurse you back to health and release you on shore, should it find you injured and bleeding in the ocean?

Then ask yourself... what species will survive longer on this rock? lol

And it later died because you enabled it to rely on another.

Baby racoons rely on their mother anyway, that's the natural way. Stone was a surrogate mother for a couple of weeks because the real one was not around,

He protected it from predators and fed it, preforming the same functions as a mother as best he could. It's not welfare to take care of babies whether human, or raccoon.

Even macho GI must have relied on handouts when it was a baby. According to your logic that makes you WEAK. And you're still sucking on the .gov teat, so not much has changed.

It's not welfare to take care of babies whether human, or raccoon.

Raccoons can survive on their own after 5 months... it’s the inner city coons that stay in their crib until they’re 35.

" The buck may have better off on its feet, in the wild.

Still, it's stupid for the gov to try to bleed money out of this Good Samaritan type. "

Agree completely !!

Otherwise, why not fine people that have bird feeders, and other wild life feeders ?

Regardless of your feelings of natural selection, this is just wrong !!

Following "natural selection " why prop up scum sucking politicians, bureaucrats, unnecessary govt employees, inner city potato's, etc, etc ?

The man did not hurt anyone, leave him alone !!

it’s the inner city coons that stay in their crib until they’re 35.

Attaboy! Say - aren't you late for your KKK meeting?

Attaboy! Say - aren't you late for your KKK meeting?

Black Lies Matters BLM