Washington is already taking sides in the battle between President Trump and incoming Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, with Trump ally Sen. Rand Paul slamming the 2012 GOP presidential nominee.
Paul tweeted that Romney is a “Big Government Republican” and faux conservative.
In reacting to Romney’s attack in the Washington Post on Trump, Paul also made clear that he does not think Romney, who is still to be sworn in as a new senator, has any affinity for former President Reagan.
Paul tweeted this morning, “Like other Big Government Republicans who never liked Reagan, Mitt Romney wants to signal how virtuous he is in comparison to the President. Well, I’m most concerned and pleased with the actual conservative reform agenda @realDonaldTrump has achieved.”
Poster Comment:
Romney is a piece of shit. Rand Paul is the best Senator by a long shot. Hopefully Rand runs after Trump serves his 12 years. Yeah 12 years.
#1: Hondo68 To: A K A Stone (#0)
On that basis you voted for him.
Rand Paul/Thomas Massie 2020!
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-02 12:13:23 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#0)
Why stop there? Why not make him "Dictator for Life"? You'd like that.
Just another reason why I refer to the rabid Trump supporters as "cultists"
Deckard posted on 2019-01-02 12:45:36 Reply Private Reply
#3: IbJensen To: A K A Stone (#0)
Romney was 'poison lite' while Obozo was unadulterated poison! Now President Trump has the job of trying to put the nation back together again in spite of the evil, treacherous leftist Democrat-Communist Party and their RINO co- conspirators.
IbJensen posted on 2019-01-02 15:59:35 Reply Private Reply
#4: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#2)
lol
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-02 18:56:47 Reply Private Reply
#5: Hondo68 To: A K A Stone, Deckard (#0)
Rand Paul on the Cavuto show.
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-02 21:18:39 Reply Private Reply
#6: GrandIsland To: hondo68 (#5)
Why can’t you Paultards have the class Rand has when it comes to Trump?
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-02 21:45:33 Reply Private Reply
#7: buckeroo To: A K A Stone (#0)
Didn't you vote for Romney in 2011 for the US President 2012-2016 term against 0bama? Why the change in perspective NOW? He was a POS then as he is now. He is a fuckin' globalist pig.
buckeroo posted on 2019-01-02 21:59:31 Reply Private Reply
#8: buckeroo To: GrandIsland, hondo68, A KA Stone (#6)
hondo68 didn't vote for "Mitt." But you did in 2011 just like Stone.
One of the truths of these forums is there are records.
buckeroo posted on 2019-01-02 22:58:26 Reply Private Reply
#9: A K A Stone To: buckeroo (#8)
Where do you get this 2011 stuff? It was 2012.
A K A Stone posted on 2019-01-02 23:30:26 Reply Private Reply
#10: Hondo68 To: buckeroo, The Fog of War, Karl Rove (#8)
Their guru Karl told them that Mittens was a winner.
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-02 23:32:44 Reply Private Reply
#11: Hondo68 To: GrandIsland, neo-Maverick Mitt (#6)
Neo-Mavericks
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-03 00:13:31 Reply Private Reply
#12: GrandIsland To: buckeroo (#7)
One word, dumb shit. VIABILITY.
Something you Paultards don’t understand. Your inability to understand that concept is the reason why Obama, after a horrendous first term, was a TWO TERM POTATO.
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-03 07:19:48 Reply Private Reply
#13: buckeroo To: GrandIsland (#12)
buckeroo posted on 2019-01-03 20:56:19 Reply Private Reply
#14: buckeroo To: GrandIsland, A K A Stone (#12)
Blame Stone for the vote of Mitt. I didn't vote for the globalist PIG.
buckeroo posted on 2019-01-03 20:58:28 Reply Private Reply
#15: GrandIsland To: buckeroo (#13)
We could be talking about Thomas Jefferson himself, time traveled to 2020... but none of that means an ounce of shit IF HE AIN’T VIABLE.
How the fuck can you NOT understand that?
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-03 22:09:32 Reply Private Reply
#16: GrandIsland To: buckeroo (#14)
You are dumber than a dried tampon.
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-03 22:13:01 Reply Private Reply
#17: Hondo68 To: GrandIsland, Mittens the loser, not viable (#16)
Massholes, Mormons and morons may vote for him, but he's hated nationally as well as worldwide.
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-03 22:20:02 Reply Private Reply
#18: buckeroo To: GrandIsland (#16)
Edit: a lot of people believe in the classick cliché of: "the best of two evils." I don't. I could give a shit. I care about electing the best candidates.
I voted for Ron Paul.
buckeroo posted on 2019-01-03 22:44:07 Reply Private Reply
#19: Deckard To: buckeroo, GrandIsland, hondo68, A KA Stone (#8)
I notice the two clowns (GrandIsland, A K A Stone) aren't denying that.
Deckard posted on 2019-01-04 06:56:18 Reply Private Reply
#20: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#19)
Hope that answers your question, drug lover.
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-04 07:18:21 Reply Private Reply
#21: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#20)
No you didn't princess.
You did vote for Romney, right cock lover?
Deckard posted on 2019-01-04 08:06:37 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hondo68 To: Deckard, McCain, Romney, bottom of the barrel losers, Obama, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Bob Dole (#19)
Typical of the GOP brand of partisan hacks who got Obama elected twice. Their candidates in '08 & '12 were so bad that they were sure losers in a national election. Worse than the two time loser Bob Dole, who gave us Jimmy Carter & Bill Clinton in '76 & '96 respectively, .
But they tell us that they're better than SOMEONE. McCain & Romney aren't better than anyone, they're not viable in the USA.
Hondo68 posted on 2019-01-04 10:02:10 Reply Private Reply
#23: Deckard To: hondo68 (#22)
Electoral College: The result of the above analysis is that Paul defeats Obama by a 342−196 margin, compared to the 332−206 margin by which Obama defeated Romney. The difference is that Paul manages to win Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington, all of which were lost by Romney.
Also, Paul does not lose any state that Romney won. This is a net gain of 136 electoral votes for the Republican candidate. In terms of states carried, Paul carries 36 and Obama carries 14+DC, while Obama carried 26+DC and Romney carried 24 in the real 2012 race. This produces the following electoral map.
Deckard posted on 2019-01-04 10:36:10 Reply Private Reply
#24: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#23)
HAAAAAAA... with his whopping 6% following.
lol
GrandIsland posted on 2019-01-04 17:43:31 Reply Private Reply