What are these pre-election mail bombs?
By John Eidson
American Thinker
October 25, 2018
Are the pre-election mail bombs the work of a right-wing nut? Or a false flag October surprise carried out by someone on the other side?
At this point, no one knows who sent mail bombs to Time Warner/CNN and prominent Democrats. There's speculation that ISIS is responsible. Unlikely. If ISIS wanted to send bombs to anyone, it would be to the man who gave orders that virtually wiped ISIS out.
Maybe the responsible party is a conservative crazy, of which there are plenty. Then again, maybe the culprit is the party that embraces Saul Alinsky's "win at all costs," "ends justify the means" election tactics.
When a political party decides it must win at all costs, what won't it do? Following are two things The Democratic Party did that show the answer to the previous question is...just about anything.
In the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, covert Democrat operatives admitted in a Project Veritas hidden camera investigation that they directed a nationwide voter fraud operation paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC:
We've been busing people in for 50 years and we aren't gonna stop now.What we do causes massive changes in state legislatures and Congress.
We target every Republican-held state in the nation.
A second Project Veritas investigation uncovered an operation where the same Democrat operatives trained paid protesters to infiltrate Trump campaign events and incite violence:
We send our people into the lines at Trump rallies to start confrontations.We are contracted directly with the DNC and the Hillary campaign.
We don't care what the legal people say – we need to win this m-----------.
Democrats tried to rig the last presidential election by orchestrating nationwide voter fraud and inciting violence at campaign events of the opposing party's nominee. Having failed at sufficiently rigging the 2016 election, who's to say they wouldn't fund a covert operation to send mail bombs as a dirty-tricks surprise timed to unfold less than two weeks before the midterms?
It's not as if such a thing would be out of their character.
John Eidson is a 1968 electrical engineering graduate of Georgia Tech; a lifelong conservative; and the father of two law-abiding, self-reliant sons.
#1: Vicomte13 To: nolu chan (#0)
Should be real easy to track when these things were sent, and a mail clerk or CCTV camera showing somebody bringing the boxes in, knowing what he looked like, the time, tracking the car.
This simply should not be hard to investigate, rapidly. Executive branch should be all over this and throwing the resources at it.
Vicomte13 posted on 2018-10-25 15:32:59 Reply Private Reply
#2: medicalmalcontent To: nolu chan (#0)
medicalmalcontent posted on 2018-10-25 16:08:09 Reply Private Reply
#3: BorisY To: medicalmalcontent (#2)
All The neTboT - AnTifa
Baseball - baTTing
All Those windows ouT
Where's wikileaks aT
On all Their- where - abouTs
Love
boris
CuT The nsa budgeT too
BorisY posted on 2018-10-25 16:27:23 Reply Private Reply
#4: nolu chan To: Vicomte13 (#1)
I don't see this as an amateur effort, so I don't suppose these parcels originated at any post office at all. I would be looking to avoid CCTV face time as much as possible.
A person working at a processing and distribution center (P&DC) could bypass the cancellation and small parcel buundle sorter (SPBS) process, and dump the parcels in one of the containers of mail going to the applicable 3-digit zip. This could be done on the floor or on the dock. It could also be done by a mailhandler or a driver in the truck used for pickup for delivery to the next transit point, such as a regional facility.
In the truck would be ideal. The floor is ringed by enclosed overhead catwalks with one way windows manned by postal inspectors, and there are cameras all over.
It would be difficult to determine from the visible evidence, when the parcels entered the mailstream, or whodunnit.
It could well be a postal worker or contract driver in Florida, if that is where the point of origin was.
nolu chan posted on 2018-10-25 18:13:57 Reply Private Reply
#5: nolu chan To: BorisY (#3)
ANTIFA has been mentioned.
Other considerations may apply. So far, all recipients have a common factor - they are all Hillary supporters. Notably missing from the list is Bernie Sanders. Also notably missing is any candidate running for office.
Hillary (and Debbie) rigged the primary process to screw Bernie. Hillary has resurfaced just in time to screw up the Dem midterm effort, to prominent calls for her to disappear. Bernie bros have been mentioned as possible people of interest. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was the common factor for a return address.
It seems to exhibit the same level of intelligence as the Kavanaugh gang rape story. Perhaps Brennan/Clapper are lurking in the background.
nolu chan posted on 2018-10-25 18:31:01 Reply Private Reply
#6: Justified To: nolu chan (#0)
Did you notice how they misspelled "Florids" but got "Debbie Wasserman Shultz"?
Found a "getter done" sticker on it as if some stupid backwards flyover hillbilly wrote it!
Also for this to be the CNN "mail room" and no mail to be seen in sight?
There is so much that points to fake/false flag/October surprise.
Justified posted on 2018-10-25 18:43:17 Reply Private Reply
#7: nolu chan To: Justified (#6)
Note they got Brennan's name wrong as well, and Brennan is at MSNBC, not CNN.
I believe the errors are deliberate.
Some have commented (elsewhere) that the "From:" and "To:" look strange. I find those common on official government mail or messages or memoranda.
The stamps are not canceled, but that can happen in the normal course of things, or if the mail was inserted into the mail stream after the point at which it woulld have been stamped.
nolu chan posted on 2018-10-25 18:53:09 Reply Private Reply
#8: Vicomte13 To: nolu chan (#0)
Vicomte13 posted on 2018-10-26 07:42:55 Reply Private Reply