Unlike the allegations of Justice Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct and excessive drinking as a teenager, there is no question here about the facts as to what happened, since they occurred on national television. At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Judge Kavanaugh’s behavior was startingly non-judicial in nature. From the outset in his prepared statement, he was angry and confrontational in manner. He was aggrieved and complaining about the situation in which he found himself. He was impolite and challenged the integrity of the Senate questioners and portrayed the hearing in the starkest partisan terms. Kavanaugh made no apparent effort to bring a lifetime of professional expertise and perspective to bear on the difficult issues under consideration. Instead, he was dismissive of the inquiry and was careless on matters of fact that had been asserted by other potential witnesses on the subject under discussion. He made obfuscating responses to questions about the meaning of words. He made no apparent effort to hold emotions in check and shouted at U.S. Senators and accused them of wrongdoing. He repeatedly sought to shift the attention and blame to others for what was taking place. He resisted further legal inquiry into the issues under discussion. He approached the inquiry with an attitude of entitlement and self-pity. His conduct was remarkably unprofessional.

Absolute bs!

He was called a rapist! OMG I would have kicked your ass! Then not only calling him a rapist they then called him a gang rapist! The fact that they can still chew food is a a HHHHHHHHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE sign of restraint!

This is more bs trying to smear a good man. All the accusers must be investigated and if shown lied must be prosecuted for bringing false allegations!

This is politics of the worst kind!

Shame on you demoncrats!

Demoncrats are so evil even the devil is scared of them!

If this does not wake up the rest of the sane world that demoncraps are at war with them nothing will open their eyes!

Let's simply focus on his 45-minute opening statement -- made after he was falsely accused by the Democrats of being a murdering (almost) rapist (almost), flasher (could have been him), and gang-rapist (well, he was there, I think) at ten different parties.

How dare he be upset that the Democrats destroyed his reputation, his life, and his family with unsupported allegations! Where's the decorum and gravitas (not that those were shown by the Democrats on the committee)?

They should release the names of the parties that filed the complaints !!

I would sure like to know what Roberts is blackmailed with !!

The GOP needs to go on the offense, release the dirt on DiFi, Shumer, Durbin, etc, etc, etc, then go after them !!

Had he walked into that hearing completely stoic in simply denying the sex assault accusations with a straight face, he would have lost the nomination for not being credible, and furthermore, spent the rest of his life as a presumed sex offender.

But because he went in as a man, passionate about his innocence, he succeeded in convincing the majority of the public of his innocence but at a cost of disqualifying himself as a USSC justice for not having the proper temperament.

So... we all now know how any single person in the USA can take down a USSC nominee.

Although Kavanaugh’s behavior was the very opposite of what one hopes for and expects in a judge, it succeeded in its immediate intent of winning the applause of President Trump and his Republican supporters. Yet his performance, which has been accurately satirized on Saturday Night Live, appalled the rest of the country and raised strictly legal questions about his temperament to sit as a judge on any federal court, let alone the Supreme Court.

Next Steps

The situation is unique in that never before has a Supreme Court appointee joined the court at a time when a fellow judge has concluded that misconduct claims against that appointee warrant review and when a former Supreme Court Justice has concluded that the appointee’s behavior was disqualifying.

Technically, Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims. But if complaints against a sitting Justice are not dealt with in an impartial apolitical manner, then there will be an asterisk against Judge Tymkovich and Justice Kavanaugh for the remainder of their terms, and indeed the U.S. Supreme Court itself.

There is therefore a risk that Mitch McConnell's seeming accomplishment of a “rock-solid Republican majority on the Supreme Court for a generation” may yet turn out to be something of a Pyrrhic victory.

Give the Republicans a few more "pyrrhic" victories like the Kavanaugh victory and the U.S. Supreme Court will remain solidly conservative for decades, claiming a 6-3 or 7-2 youthful majority appointed for life while maintaining good behavior.

Unlike the allegations of Justice Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct and excessive drinking as a teenager, there is no question here about the facts as to what happened, since they occurred on national television.

[...]

Technically, Supreme Court justices are not subject to the misconduct rules governing these claims.

As a matter of absolute fact, the alleged bullshit occurred prior to Kavanaugh being confirmed and taking his place of the bench of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The situation is unique only in that the lowlife losers have never before thrown such a temper tantrum following their abject defeat and the glorious victory of the nominee being confirmed.

In every way imaginable, not just technically, sitting justices are not subject to such misconduct alleged by losers throwing a temper tantrum after confirmation and swearing in. According to Article 3, Sec 1, Supreme Court justices "shall hold their offices during good behaviour." There is no exception empowering disgruntled losers claiming that a justice drank beer or threw ice cubes as a teen. There is no exception emowering infantile complaints against a justice putting despicable, scumbag senators in their place during confirmation hearings.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/11/john-roberts-brett-kavanaugh-misconduct-complaints/

Chief Justice Refers Kavanaugh Misconduct Complaints To Federal Court

1:06 PM 10/11/2018 | Politics
Kevin Daley | Supreme Court Reporter
The Daily Caller

Chief Justice John Roberts referred 15 judicial misconduct complaints against Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for further investigation Wednesday.

The referral is likely of little consequence, however, as Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court places him beyond the reach of ordinary judicial rules, making him removable only through impeachment.

“I’m a little disappointed that Chief Justice Roberts sent the Kavanaugh complaints to the 10th Circuit Judicial Council given that its chief judge, Tim Tymkovich, was picked by the Bush administration during the time Kavanaugh was working on judicial nominations in the White House counsel’s office,” Gabe Roth, executive director of the judicial oversight group Fix the Court, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit received a number of complaints after Kavanaugh’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, alleging he made false statements and failed to maintain judicial temperament. (RELATED: Supreme Court Weighs Trump Administration’s Power To Detain Criminal Aliens)

Judge Merrick Garland would ordinarily process these complaints in his capacity as chief judge of the D.C. Circuit. Garland recused himself from the matter, however, so Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson disposed of the complaints by referring them to Roberts. The Washington Post first reported on Henderson’s referral.

“The complaints seek investigations only of the public statements he has made as a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States,” Henderson said in a statement. They do not pertain to the sexual misconduct allegations Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez and others lodged against Kavanaugh, as judicial conduct inquiries do not reach events which occurred before a judge’s elevation to the federal bench.

Judicial conduct and disability inquiries generally remain confidential until they are completed.

Now that Kavanaugh is a justice, it’s unlikely he will face consequences, whatever the merit of the complaints. Roth noted the rules governing judicial behavior do not apply to Supreme Court justices.

“I fully expect the Tenth Circuit Judicial Council to dismiss the complaint against Justice Kavanaugh,” Roth said. “The Judicial Conduct and Disability Act excludes Supreme Court justices from its definition of ‘judge,’ and given Kavanaugh’s recent elevation, he no longer falls within the scope of those who can be investigated under the current law.”

Kavanaugh heard his first arguments as a justice Tuesday.

This is a ploy to use the judiciary to overturn the will of the people. Again.

If the Senate thought he lacked temperament they had the opportunity to vote against him.

Well, there's that. But election day is less than a month away and they have a willing MSM to make believe the fight goes on. I guess it sounds better to the rubes than an admission that Feinstein et al. got their asses handed to them, and the whole thing was exposed as a sham.

Oh, and Hillary promises that civility will return once they win. Just like Obama promised improved race relations if he won.