Why do you continually try to scaremonger as you repeatedly spread such ridiculously exaggerated rumors of some fictious impending danger?

...ridiculously exaggerated rumors of some fictious impending danger?

You're a government-worshiping, brainwashed sheeple.

Hey, didn't you vote for this guy?

Trump: "Take the guns first, go through due process second"

Tater is a clear and present danger, be prepared.

Tater is a clear and present danger …

You bet your “cotton picking ass” that I am definitely a “clear and present danger” to every asshole Paultard libertarian as I continue to condemn them for having such a preposterous fantasy.

So preposterous that one can only wonder how alleged intelligent adults can seriously entertain it.

Ah, but the power of the human mind to rationalize things is truly awesome in their mythical world.

… be prepared.

Your warning is futile for there is absolutely no way to “be prepared” from my attacks with more “truth bombs” released than could ever be imagined.

..ridiculously exaggerated rumors of some fictious impending danger?

You're a government-worshiping, brainwashed sheeple.

You are one sick asshole who continually spreads your ideology of fear through propaganda articles you mainly parrot that are collected from The Free Thought Project along with other yellow journalism sources and the likes thereof in your effort to fulfill a concealed agenda. The difference between you and a terrorist is that you fight with false information and not direct violence.

Trump: "Take the guns first, go through due process second"

You may be surprised to learn this is no new idea since SCOTUS has repeatedly authorized depriving persons of liberty or property without first according them a full trial-type due process proceeding – which comes later. This according to law professor John Banzhaf, who teaches many of these fundamental Supreme Court due process cases.

While the Constitution provides “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” there Have been numerous situations where the deprivation did take place long before there is time for a full evidentiary hearing in court known a “due process hearing”.

The “take the guns first, go through due process second" action is most common, and not surprising that one this is most closely analogous to the seizure of weapons to which Trump mentioned.

For example: It does occur when there are ANY REASONABLE GROUNDS to believe that a law enforcement official is not fit to continue patrolling with a firearm. . SCOTUS has UPHELD the “take-first and due-process evidentiary hearing later” procedure, even in cases where the risks of not acting promptly do not involve public health or safety.

Hey, didn't you vote for this guy?

Hey, you are damned well right.

I most certainly did vote for Donald Trump and I continue to be proud of doint that with each passing day as Trump continues his actions to “Make America Great Again”.

God Bless Donald Trump !!!

Aren't you the clown who believes that Americans have no right to defend themselves against government tyranny?

Look asshole - the plan all along is to DISARM American citizens.

Your ignorance does not negate that fact.

What Can Be Done When They Come for the Guns?

RESIST!

https://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/default.xqy?keys=FOEA-print-04-02-02-4598

This was a documented early and insidious intrusion into the right to keep and bear arms. They have been coming for our guns ever since.

Meeting Minutes of University of Virginia Board of Visitors, 4 Oct. 1824

[excerpt]

No Student shall, within the precincts of the University, introduce, keep or use any spirituous or vinous liquors, keep or use weapons or arms of any kind, or gunpowder, keep a servant, horse or dog, appear in school with a stick, or any weapon, nor, while in school, be covered without permission of the Professor, nor use tobacco by smoking or chewing, on pain of any of the minor punishments at the discretion of the Faculty, or of the board of Censors, approved by the Faculty.

[...]

Substitutes in the form of arms shall be provided by the Proctor, at the expence of the University; they shall be distinguished by numbers, delivered out, recieved in and deposited under the care and responsibility of the Instructor, in a proper depository to be furnished him; and all injuries to them by a student shall be repaired at the expence of such Student.

This was approved by the board. The board included Thomas Jefferson, drafter of the Declaration of Independence, and James Madison, drafter of the Second Amendment.

What Can Be Done When They Come for the Guns?

That's like asking, "What Can Be Done When Your Daughter Says She's Pregnant?

The time to deal with those issues is waaaay before they happen with the intent of preventing them.

Oh wait, now I remember you.

Whether it's occasional forgetfulness or loss of short-term memory that is now so obviously interfering with your daily life, there are many causes of memory loss.

To what do you attribute your poor memory problem?

Is it medications, alcohol or drug use?

I strongly suspect the latter based on your posting history and how you constantly promote the use of drugs.

Aren't you the clown who believes that Americans have no right to defend themselves against government tyranny?

And “there you go again” using your inflammatory rhetoric….”government tyranny.”

What do you mean “tyranny?”

I look at the historical definition of tyranny and see that it referres to a ruler (“tyrant”) who is not legitimate, according to the law or tradition of the country. In simple words, he did not properly come into the line of rule but as in the inheritance, like kings.

Defend “themselves against government tyranny?”

Why worry about defending against government tyranny when the absolute best way to avoid tyranny is to implement a governmental system of checks and balances. The United States did that a long time ago.

The Founding Fathers brilliantly saw to that task when they established our system of government in which each branch keeps a check on the other branches with no one branch controlling too much power. You do agree, don’t you?

If you avoid tyranny, which our system of government was designed to do and effectively does, then there is no use to needlessly concern yourself worrying about defending against tyranny?

Est-ce pas vrai?

Look asshole - the plan all along is to DISARM American citizens.

Your ignorance does not negate that fact.

Look asshole - the plan all along is to DISARM American citizens.

Show “the plan” of which you speak and anticipate the usage thereof. Can you?

Left Wing Loon President Trump advocates Chairman Mao's position on firearms ownership.

He says that there will be a ban on bump stocks in a couple of weeks, and he's also pushing Stop and Frisk. All of these are violations of the 2nd amendment, with some 4th amendment violations thrown in for good measure.

He's very dedicated to the David Hogg/Dianne Feinstein agenda.

... the plan all along is to DISARM American citizens.

This point has been discussed and dismissed.

Nothing here.

Move along ...

Left Wing Loon President Trump advocates Chairman Mao's position on firearms ownership.

In your effort to demonize President Trump and feel you are attempting in some way to prevent him from taking weapons out of the hands off the people when he is doing no such thing, you have now through your blatant stupidity ignorantly joined the zealots who fabricate malicious claims to attack President Trump.

One of the false assertions is the repeated claim that “they” are coming to take your guns away like the commie Chairman Mao did. This is perhaps the most repeated fear statement and thusly links gun control to communism for a paranoidal association. This association is done so it will appear that anyone who supports gun control is portrayed as being a communist.

The automatic association you have made here between Trump and communism is just plain dishonest and thoroughly exposes your ignorant and scheming ways. Shame on you….shame on you!

Go make a check and get back to me if you find on any website that deals in Chinese law, a law that prohibited anyone from having any guns during the revolutionary period in China. I contend there is literally no law during the revolutionary period that prohibited anyone from having any guns and furthermore, there is absolutely no source for claiming that the Party took people’s guns away.

I challenge you to prove me wrong.

In your search for the truth you will find that during the revolutionary time the people in China were armed. They carried their guns to work, carried them into the fields and carried them everywhere.

No, Mao didn’t ban people from having guns. Mao’s government officials were the ones that gave guns out to people in order to arm their “People’s Army."

He [Trump] says that there will be a ban on bump stocks in a couple of weeks, and he's also pushing Stop and Frisk. All of these are violations of the 2nd amendment, with some 4th amendment violations thrown in for good measure.

You need to stay on topic.

He's [Trump is] very dedicated to the David Hogg/Dianne Feinstein agenda.

That’s BULLSHIT and you damn well know that it is.

Stop making up lies!!!

Quit making up lies attempting to defend Mao & Donnell.

You made the association.

Now you need to show any evidence Chairman Mao restricted or confiscated guns.

Can you?

You made the association.

Now you need to show any evidence Chairman Mao restricted or confiscated guns.

Can you?

Trump: "Take the guns first, go through due process second"

Hey, fuckstain, tell me, the last 4 presidential candidates you voted for... what have they done to protect my 2nd amendment rights?

Nothing you say? That’s what I thought. Shut your cream catcher.

“All political power comes from the barrel of the gun: You register and ban the firearms before the slaughter.” Mao Tae Sung 1938

So, I’m here to tell your deceiving and lying ass that Mao never said: “You register and ban the firearms before the slaughter.”

You need to stop putting out false bullshit and trying to pass off a lie as a factually true historical quotation just to promote your sick agenda.

You are just like Deckard, another sick POS who will blindly believe anything you find on the Internet, especially if it feeds your confirmation bias.

Mao never wanted gun control.

Mao wanted the laboring people to awaken to the importance of having guns in their own hands. He said that by having guns, they can create Party organizations. He continued by saying that tjey can also create cadres, create schools, create culture, create mass movements and everything in Yenan has been created by having guns. He continued saying that all things grow out of the barrel of a gun. Mao then concludes by saying that experience in the class struggle in the era of imperialism teaches them that it is only by the power of the gun that the working class and the laboring masses can defeat the armed bourgeoisie and landlords; in this sense we may say that only with guns can the whole world be transformed.

Mao never wanted to take the guns from laboring class or keep the guns out of their hands.

YOUR MEME IS PURE BULLSHIT – IT IS A LIE AND SHOULD BE TAKEN DOWN.

I will now present the 1938 paragraph below that contains the CORRECT phrase; the central phrase (in bold), cited as deriving from the 1938 speech via the Selected Works, is thr EXACT wording given in Mao's Quotations.

Communists do not fight for personal military power (they must in no circumstances do that, and let no one ever again follow the example of Chang Kuo- tao), but they must fight for military power for the Party, for military power for the people. As a national war of resistance is going on, we must also fight for military power for the nation. Where there is naivete on the question of military power, nothing whatsoever can be achieved. It is very difficult for the labouring people, who have been deceived and intimidated by the reactionary ruling classes for thousands of years, to awaken to the importance of having guns in their own hands. Now that Japanese imperialist oppression and the nation-wide resistance to it have pushed our labouring people into the arena of war, Communists should prove themselves the most politically conscious leaders in this war. Every Communist must grasp the truth, "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party. Yet, having guns, we can create Party organizations, as witness the powerful Party organizations which the Eighth Route Army has created in northern China. We can also create cadres, create schools, create culture, create mass movements. Everything in Yenan has been created by having guns. All things grow out of the barrel of a gun. According to the Marxist theory of the state, the army is the chief component of state power. Whoever wants to seize and retain state power must have a strong army. Some people ridicule us as advocates of the "omnipotence of war". Yes, we are advocates of the omnipotence of revolutionary war; that is good, not bad, it is Marxist. The guns of the Russian Communist Party created socialism. We shall create a democratic republic. Experience in the class struggle in the era of imperialism teaches us that it is only by the power of the gun that the working class and the labouring masses can defeat the armed bourgeoisie and landlords; in this sense we may say that only with guns can the whole world be transformed. We are advocates of the abolition of war, we do not want war; but war can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.

— Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. II, pp. 224-225^[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_power_grows_out_of_the_barrel_of_a_ g un.

Mao never wanted to take the guns from laboring class or keep the guns out of their hands.

Wow - defending Mao huh?

WTF are you doing on this site commie?

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Who took the guns?

It matters greatly that you continue to post LIES and I say that it’s time for Stone to bridle your lies and reign you in from continuing to post them.

To this end, I am now calling on Stone to immediately delete your posts #15 and #19 that contain unproven accusations….in other words, multiple lies.

I challenged you on the Mao quote lie by showing you where the quote you posted was a lie when I reproduced the entire paragraph containing the correct remark Mao made in 1938.

But that did not phase you and now “here you come again” when you continue to post the SAME lie in post #19 showing that something happened with Mao and you are unable to verify it happened.

It is bad enough when you post a lie where you tried to show that in 1938 Mao Ta Sung said “you register and ban the firearms before the slaughter” and you cannot show a source for that quote.

But it is far worse that you are posted a FLAT OUT LIE about President Donald Trump and I am here to say that you have gone TOO far with your constant lying.

You have now passed being repulsive when you lied with an accusation where you stated that “Left Wing Loon President Trump advocates Chairman Mao's position on firearms ownership” thereby accusing President Trump of contemplating a Mao position and action that Mao NEVER stated or held.

STOP with the damned LIES, hondo !!!

I am now calling on Stone to immediately delete your posts #15 and #19

Yet you want to continue to post your commie propaganda and declare your love for Chairman Mao.

WTF are you doing on this site ...

I’ll kick your stupid ass later.

I am now calling on Stone to immediately delete your posts #15 and #19.

Yet you want to continue to post your commie propaganda and declare your love for Chairman Mao.

I want no such thing.

I want to continue attacking and debunking lies.

And that is what I damned well will do.

Understand?

Right now I am on this site in the process of trying to get hondo’s lies deleted and especially his lie about President Trump,

Everyone here knows Hondo is a liar. He isn't truthful. He exxagerates and stretches and outright lies.

Maybe I should just ban him and Fred Mertz. They don't add a whole lot here.

Fred just whines and creis like a snowflake. Hondo makes stuff up like a little kid.

We know who he is.

Maybe I should just ban him and Fred Mertz. They don't add a whole lot here.

And I can also say I feel the ban action would add stature to your forum.

I really don’t know how you have tolerated them for so long.

Anyway, I have no problem with Fred since he placed me on bozo and I no longer read his posts.

And I am just about to the point of completely ignoring hondo. In fact, I am probably already there.

Edit -

Whatever you may decide to do, please leave Deckard alone.

Deckard continues to provide a platform for some great entertainment.

His irrational musings would be dearly missed by all.

Fred’s Ass Hurtz & Hondope

They are squatters... nothing more.

Real tough guy, aren't you ...

Nope.

I'm just a truthfully straight forward ole country boy who will challenge any and all lies.

Don't you ever forget that !!!

China established gun control in 1935.

America beat China by one year to establish gun control when the first major federal fun control law passed in the 20th century was the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934. The National Firearms Act was passed after Prohibition-era gangsterism peaked with the Saint Valentine's Day massacre of 1929.

"Gun control" isn't synonymous with “gun confiscation” libertarian asshole.

The subject hondo and I were discussing was “gun confiscation” and never “gun control.”

But since you stuck your nose in, I ask you to now show me where Mao said: “You register and ban the firearms before the slaughter.”

The subject hondo and I were discussing was “gun confiscation” and never “gun control.”

The lies just never stop from Chairman Mao's Canary, tater tot.

I was discussing Gun Control/Confiscation, and Gatlin was mostly off topic with pro-Mao/Trump commie propaganda, shuck 'n jive about gun control not being confiscation, and Donnell & Mao are real cool cats.

So called "gun control" tyranny is accompanied by and enforced with jail, confiscations, 4th amendment illegal search and seizure (theft), blacklists including prohibition against voting for a representative government (permanent "felon"). At this point, one is a tax slave, a second class peon/serf. Does the phrase "Taxation without Representation" sound familiar?

Gun Control = Gun Confiscation

" Gun Control = Gun Confiscation "

Yes it is. That is obvious, and elementary knowledge to any one with a bit of common sense, and even a minimal amount of historical knowledge!!!

However, those that are not as smart as they think they are, will fail to understand !!!