Sanders Demands FBI Investigate Whether Kavanaugh Lied to Congress -- Grassley Responds

Source: Bernie Sanders/Chuck Grassley
Published: Sep 29, 2018
Author: Bernie Sanders/Chuck Grassley
Post Date: 2018-09-30 14:31:45 by nolu chan
Views: 2197

Sanders Demands FBI Investigate Whether Kavanaugh Lied to Congress

Saturday, September 29, 2018

BURLINGTON, Vt., Sept. 29 – U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) sent the following letter Saturday to Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) demanding that the reopened FBI investigation into Judge Brett Kavanaugh examine the veracity of the judge's testimony before the committee, in addition to accusations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick.

"A fundamental question the FBI can help answer is whether Judge Kavanaugh has been truthful with the committee. This goes to the very heart of whether he should be confirmed to the court," Sanders wrote.

Sanders also called on the Senate to give the FBI as much time as the bureau needs to complete a thorough investigation. "First and foremost, we need the truth," said Sanders.

Below is the text of the letter:

Dear Chairman Grassley,

In order for this FBI investigation regarding Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to be complete, it is imperative the bureau must not only look into the accusations made by Dr. Ford, Deborah Ramirez and Julie Swetnick, it should also examine the veracity of his testimony before the Judiciary Committee.

The Senate should not constrain the FBI to one week and must allow time for a full investigation. I would request that you inform the FBI that you will not consider their work complete until they examine the truthfulness of Judge Kavanaugh’s statements under oath while testifying before the Senate throughout his career, given the very serious fact that lying to Congress is a federal crime.

If you are concerned with a delay in this confirmation process, remember that Senate Republicans refused to allow the Senate to consider Merrick Garland’s nomination to the Supreme Court for nearly a year.

In addition to investigating the accusations made by multiple women, a thorough investigation should include a review of Judge Kavanaugh’s numerous untruthful statements in his previous testimony before Congress. Specifically:

  • In his previous testimony before Congress, Judge Kavanaugh was asked more than 100 times if he knew about files stolen by Republican staffers from Judiciary Committee Democrats. He said he knew nothing. Emails released as part of these hearings show that these files were regularly shared with Kavanaugh while he was on the White House staff. One of the emails had the subject line “spying.” Was Judge Kavanaugh being truthful with the committee?

  • In 2006 Judge Kavanaugh told Congress he did not know anything about the NSA warrantless wiretapping program prior to it being reported by the New York Times. This year an email revealed that while at the White House he might have been involved in some conversations about this program. Was Judge Kavanaugh being truthful with the committee?

  • In 2004 Judge Kavanaugh testified the nomination of William Pryor to the 11th Circuit “was not one that I worked on personally.” Documents now contradict that statement. Newly released documents also call into question whether Judge Kavanaugh was truthful that the nomination of Charles Pickering “was not one of the judicial nominees that I was primarily handling.” Was Judge Kavanaugh being truthful with the committee?

  • In 2006 Judge Kavanaugh testified, “I was not involved and am not involved in the questions about the rules governing detention of combatants.” New evidence released as part of these confirmation hearing contradicts that assertion. Was Judge Kavanaugh being truthful with the committee?

  • Kavanaugh testified before the committee that he did not believe polygraphs were reliable. In 2016 he wrote, “As the Government notes, law enforcement agencies use polygraphs to test the credibility of witnesses and criminal defendants. Those agencies also use polygraphs to ‘screen applicants for security clearances so that they may be deemed suitable for work in critical law enforcement, defense, and intelligence collection roles.’ . . . The Government has satisfactorily explained how polygraph examinations serve law enforcement purposes.” (Sack v. United States Department of Defense, 823 F.3d 687 (2016)) What changed his opinion or was he misleading the committee as to his beliefs about the reliability of polygraph tests?

Additionally, several statements made by Judge Kavanaugh under oath regarding his treatment of women and his use of alcohol appear not to be true. The scope of the FBI’s investigation must include investigating the following statements:

  • Judge Kavanaugh repeatedly told the committee he never drank to the point where he didn’t remember something. He also denied ever becoming aggressive when he drinks. However there have been many reports from those Judge Kavanaugh attended high school, college and law school with that contradict this assertion. Was he being truthful with the committee?

  • Judge Kavanaugh testified he treated women “as friends and equals” and “with dignity and respect.” Numerous entries in his school yearbook would seem to contradict this. Was Judge Kavanaugh’s statement to the committee truthful?

  • Judge Kavanaugh claimed that he and Dr. Ford “did not travel in the same social circles.” Dr. Ford said she dated Chris Garrett, referenced as a friend in his yearbook. In fact she testified Garrett introduced her to Kavanaugh. Was Judge Kavanaugh’s statement to the committee truthful?

  • Kavanaugh claimed he did not drink on weeknights but an entry on his calendar for Thursday July 1 states, “Go to Timmy’s for Skis w/ Judge, Tom, Pj, Bernie, Squi.” Kavanaugh clarified to Sen. Booker that “Skis” referred to beer. Was his original statement to the committee truthful?

A fundamental question the FBI can help answer is whether Judge Kavanaugh has been truthful with the committee. This goes to the very heart of whether he should be confirmed to the court. If a thorough investigation takes longer than a week, so be it. First and foremost, we need the truth.

Sincerely,

Bernard Sanders

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

https://www.scribd.com/document/389793278/Grassley-to-Bernie-Sanders-29-Sep-2018

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Justified    To: nolu chan (#0)

Just shows you how demented Sanders really is. He is not the nice guy they claim he is. You know him by the fact that he pushes socialism to young people like crack dealers push crack to children!

This also shows you that they demoncrats know that if Kavanaugh is confirmed its over for them in the supreme court.

There has been no evidence of any wrong doing by Kavanaugh which demands then if Kavanaugh is not lying who is? Now we must investigate the accusers and the people pushing the accusers. This would only be equal justice if the government investigates the demoncrats and the accusers!

There is an ole saying. Watch what you ask for because you might just get it!

Justified posted on 2018-09-30 14:52:58   Reply   Private Reply


#2: GrandIsland    To: Justified (#1)

The filthy piece of shit wants to get the sheep hooked on welfare, like a crack dealer gets a drug lover hooked on heroin.

GrandIsland posted on 2018-09-30 17:19:53   Reply   Private Reply


#3: nolu chan    To: Justified (#1)

Now we must investigate the accusers and the people pushing the accusers.

I believe Ford is mentally ill and not responsible. I believe her attorney manipulated her to go to Washington and testify at a televised hearing. I also believe her attorney failed to ensure her client made an informed decision to go, with the knowledge that she could have been interviewed in California or wherever she was at, or she could have testified at a private, closed hearing at the Senate.

nolu chan posted on 2018-09-30 20:29:05   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Justified    To: nolu chan (#3)

If they are a demoncrat they have mental issues. That goes without saying! LOL

Demoncrats will get away with this unpunished as always. I do not care if the people punish them I believe the government should have mechanism to go after people who cause this kinda of problems. There should be limits!

Justified posted on 2018-10-01 13:49:22   Reply   Private Reply


#5: BorisY    To: nolu chan (#3)

her attorney manipulated her

The melTdown is priceless

spearchucking crazies

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2018-10-01 14:58:36   Reply   Private Reply


#6: BorisY    To: All (#5)

evenTually

we'll find ouT

The beach people were

son of sam

neighborhood dogs

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2018-10-01 16:01:01   Reply   Private Reply


#7: nolu chan    To: BorisY (#6)

The beach people were

son of sam

neighborhood dogs

And the people who occupied the area behind Ford's second door may have been running a psychology business.

nolu chan posted on 2018-10-01 16:27:24   Reply   Private Reply


#8: BorisY    To: nolu chan (#7)

my infallible inTuiTion

keeps Telling me

iT was forTune Telling illegal aliens

from mars

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2018-10-01 16:59:09   Reply   Private Reply