Senate questions Kavanaugh on fourth allegation after anonymous letter sent to Sen. Gardner’s office
Posted 5:12 pm, September 26, 2018,
by Web Staff,
KDVR
Updated at 05:45PM, September 26, 2018
WASHINGTON -- The Senate Judiciary Committee is questioning Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh after an anonymous letter was sent to Sen. Cory Gardner's office.
Republican Judiciary Committee members outlined the letter and questioned Kavanaugh during a phone call on Tuesday, according to a transcript.
The anonymous complaint sent to Gardner's office said that Kavanaugh physically assaulted a woman he socialized with in the Washington, D.C., area in 1998 while he was inebriated.
In the phone interview, Kavanaugh said the events did not occur.
"We're dealing with an anonymous letter about an anonymous person and an anonymous friend. It's ridiculous," he said, according to the transcript.
The sender of the letter detailed the alleged event that involved her own daughter, Kavanaugh and several friends.
A portion of the letter was read to Kavanaugh. "When they left the bar under the influence of alcohol. They were all shocked when Brett Kavanaugh, shoved her friend up against the wall very aggressively and sexually. There were at least four witnesses including my daughter."
Sources told FOX31 that the letter was "extremely anonymous" and that it lacks many details.
In a statement, Sen. Gardner's office said that the letter "contained no names, no address, and no contact info."
"Upon receiving the anonymous letter we immediately notified the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is handling the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. The letter was shared with both Republican staff and Democrat staff," the statement said.
"Due to privacy regarding mail that comes into our office, we do not share the content of correspondence," the statement continued. "Additionally, this anonymous letter contained no name or no contact info so our office is unable to contact the individual that sent the anonymous letter."
[snip]
#1: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#0)
Even for the 'Rats, that's hitting Desperation Rock Bottom.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-09-26 20:52:02 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#0)
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-09-26 21:03:29 Reply Private Reply
#3: nolu chan To: Hank Rearden (#2)
I believe the victim. She has the right not only to be heard, but to be believed.
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-26 21:38:15 Reply Private Reply
#4: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#3)
I truly hope that was sarcasm.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-09-27 01:34:16 Reply Private Reply
#5: Justified To: nolu chan (#0)
Repugs cower and refuse to fight, Again!
America is getting fucked, again!
Who really cares that a man who has done right all his life is getting smeared by vague innuendo's that are not being challenged!
Demoncrat party is the most vile group of people in the history of the world with the repugs being the whimpist group of people in history!
I am sick of this! How do we win and still lose in the end!!!!
Justified posted on 2018-09-27 13:29:15 Reply Private Reply
#6: nolu chan To: Justified (#5)
Not all of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GONHkIGagY
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-27 20:11:12 Reply Private Reply
#7: nolu chan To: Hank Rearden (#4)
Considering that Victim #5 would have been dead for 35 years, I hope it was sarcastic. I just applied Sen. Mazie Hirono's words to the situation. It's ridiculous in any context.
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-27 20:22:43 Reply Private Reply
#8: Justified To: nolu chan (#6)
ITS ABOUT FREAKING TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BTW that's how pissed I am about this crap!
Justified posted on 2018-09-27 20:53:38 Reply Private Reply
#9: nolu chan To: Justified (#8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klFIK_2IP5A
Ford couldn't testify Monday because of her fear of flying, necessitating her travel by car, yet she may qualify for frequent flyer miles.
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-27 21:22:48 Reply Private Reply
#10: nolu chan To: Justified (#8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xgqvd7fvR5o
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-27 21:26:07 Reply Private Reply
#11: nolu chan To: Justified (#8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypv8fcRpiSE
This shitbag starts by asking Kavanaugh if he is familiar with the term Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one, false in all. My instant thought was to give an example, if a person were to claim he was a veteran who served in Vitenam, when he actually obtained five deferments, then secured a slot in the reserves, and never left the States, that would be false in one thing, and he could be considered false in all things. Another example would be someone who claimed to have been captain of the Harvard swim team when in reality he was never on the team.
nolu chan posted on 2018-09-27 21:54:38 Reply Private Reply
#12: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#7)
Zackly.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-09-28 17:21:45 Reply Private Reply
#13: CZ82 To: All (#0)
https://noqreport.com/2018/11/02/judy-munro-leighton-admits-wasnt-jane-doe- accused-brett-kavanaugh-rape/
CZ82 posted on 2019-01-17 16:56:52 Reply Private Reply