The Baltimore police claim that the boy was accused of trying to break into a neighbor’s house. However, the boy’s family says he was merely trying to find their lost cat ...

... by breaking into a neighbor's house.

"The boy's family" my ass. You mean "the boy's mother". And she needs to understand that just because you come up with a reason for breaking into someone's house doesn't mean you're allowed to break into someone's house.

When Deontay’s mother, Kimberly Townes saw her children being ordered to get on the ground, she stepped in and spoke up.

And that's when things went south. But she blames the cops, not herself. Figures.

Her kids will grow up imitating their mother and one day Deontay will end up dying in a hail of police bullets.

And she needs to understand that just because you come up with a reason for breaking into someone's house doesn't mean you're allowed to break into someone's house.

There's no admission the kid was ever trying to break into a house. If he was merely in the yard, that's likely not trespassing or any kind of offense.

If there's reasonable suspicion of a crime, then yes, the cop is within his authority to detain and mom doesn't have a right to order the kids into the house. But it is certainly well within mom's right to be on the scene and be involved in the process, given the kid is a minor.

There's not enough info here to say who made the first wrong move. The cop obviously lost his temper so it's an even bet as to who that was.

the boy is mentally disabled.

Never a shortage of stories regarding... the retard that went wrong.

There's no admission the kid was ever trying to break into a house. If he was merely in the yard, that's likely not trespassing or any kind of offense.

According to the article, "The Baltimore police claim that the boy was accused of trying to break into a neighbor’s house."

Was he or was he merely tresspassing? That's for a judge to determine after hearing the testimony of everyone involved. The police are there to enforce the law, not hear the case. And certainly mama is not an impartial trier of fact.

"But it is certainly well within mom's right to be on the scene and be involved in the process"

By "involved in the process" you mean telling her 13-year-old son not follow police orders and to interfere with the arrest"? No, she has no "right" to do that. She's lucky this "hot-headed out-of-control crazy" cop didn't arrest her, too. Right?

Never a shortage of stories regarding... the retard that went wrong.

And if the cops didn't know he was a retard then they should have known he was a retard. It's their fault, you see.

Retarded or not, WTF is mama doing on the sidelines yelling and screaming for her son not to do what the cop says?

he's lucky this "hot-headed out-of-control crazy" cop didn't arrest her, too. Right?

Actually, the cop probably should have arrested her. She got off easy.

Because they a liberal Paultards, that’s why. lol

WTF is mama doing on the sidelines yelling and screaming for her son not to do what the cop says?

Because she’s a dysfunctional retard herself. Any surprise this genetic piece of shit came screaming out of her welfare goop chute, 13 years ago?

According to the article, "The Baltimore police claim that the boy was accused of trying to break into a neighbor’s house."

Two key words: "claim" and "accused".

Was he or was he merely tresspassing? That's for a judge to determine after hearing the testimony of everyone involved.

If I'm not mistaken, it's not trespassing to enter private property unless the property is clearly marked, and possibly fenced. I think you've made the point yourself about cops knocking on doors.

The police are there to enforce the law, not hear the case. And certainly mama is not an impartial trier of fact.

Neither are the cops.

By "involved in the process" you mean telling her 13-year-old son not follow police orders and to interfere with the arrest"?

We don't know the level of her involvement. That she wasn't arrested seems to make it clear even the police didn't consider her involvement as obstructing.

We don't know details of what happened. I'm man enough to admit it, as I've already done. Feel free to man up yourself. (And you can interpret that any way you want).

Because she’s a dysfunctional retard herself. Any surprise this genetic piece of shit came screaming out of her welfare goop chute, 13 years ago?

Somehow, I suspect this 13 year old mentally deficient kid is still more mature than you are.

Somehow, I suspect this 13 year old mentally deficient kid is still more mature than you are.

I’ve never acted a retard fool and caused the cops to have to police the sheep. But this little retard did. Somehow I suspect you’re just as retarded, as this window licker.

Somehow I suspect you’re just as retarded

Somehow, I believe that you are as suspicious as you say.

But I suggest you pay more attention to your own mental development and stop embarrassing good cops everywhere with your childish vulgarity which is apparently just part of who you are. Not that I'm telling you how you should live. It's a suggestion. I respect your right to make an ass of yourself online, which is a right you have clearly demanded, in true libertarian fashion.

If Deckard does have an ill-regard for cops, it's no doubt your kind of cop that has fostered that sentiment.

The Baltimore police claim that the boy was accused of trying to break into a neighbor’s house. However, the boy’s family says he was merely trying to find their lost cat. Either way, police showed up and the scene went from calm to all hell breaking loose in a matter of minutes. The first video shows the officer ordering the 13-year-old boy, Deontay, and his 11-year-old sister to sit down. Although that video ends abruptly, it shows the two children complying with the orders. When Deontay’s mother, Kimberly Townes saw her children being ordered to get on the ground, she stepped in and spoke up. “He told them get on the ground,” Kimberly Townes, the child’s mother, told WBAL-TV. “I said, ‘No, they ain’t getting on no ground.’ She 11 and he’s 13. They not getting on the ground. So I told them, ‘come on.’ When I said that, he grabbed my son, like close armed him, hit him down, tried to get the handcuffs on him, then he started closed fisting my son.” As the video shows, Deontay was certainly fighting back, but this could be considered self-defense as he had apparently done nothing wrong. However, his resistance was met with brute force by the officer who was twice his size.

Yeah. Sounds like the mother needs to go to jail, too.

BTW is "mentally disabled" code word for he is a criminal?

There's not enough info here to say who made the first wrong move.

Then there is this "break into a neighbor’s house" from the article.

BTW this is freethought which in my opinion clickbait site.

BTW this is freethought which in my opinion clickbait site.

They write their shit with a bias slant, and leave all important info out... just like YAHOO news does for the snowflakes. Agitate propaganda. Millennial sheep getting triggered... just like a few of our posters.

There are a few here that are sheep enough to take the paultard worm... hook, line and sinker. lol

Two key words: "claim" and "accused".

Correct. And who should sort that out? The police? The boy's mother? Or a judge?

"If I'm not mistaken, it's not trespassing to enter private property unless the property is clearly marked, and possibly fenced."

Again, correct. Was the boy merely in the neighbor's yard or was he attempting to break into the neighbor's house (as reported to the police)? Shouldn't this be settled by a judge?

"We don't know the level of her involvement. That she wasn't arrested seems to make it clear even the police didn't consider her involvement as obstructing."

Sure we do. It's on the video. She was obstructing. She should have been arrested.

"We don't know details of what happened."

We know enough to have an opinion. We don't know enough to convict him of a crime. That's up to the judge.

Sure we do. It's on the video. She was obstructing. She should have been arrested.

I didn't watch the video. But in other cases you say the judge should decide. In this case you decided. Why are you being a hypocrite?

Then there is this "break into a neighbor’s house" from the article.

Well, that's according to the biased and racist neighbor who saw what was happening and called the police. Now, are you going to believe the neighbor or the retard and and his overly-protective mother?

I didn't watch the video. But in other cases you say the judge should decide. In this case you decided. Why are you being a hypocrite?

I'm not. I'm saying she should have been arrested for obstruction, then let the judge decide her guilt or innocence.