| This weekend I was writing about the dismay being expressed by various European leaders these days as they come to realize that the status quo is changing and they cant simply take advantage of the United States anymore. One area where thats abundantly clear is found in the subject of military spending. Western Europe, in particular, has had a pretty smooth ride since the Second World War, being able to save a lot of money by not funding large military forces and relying on America to keep them secure.
Nowhere is this more evident than in Germany. While we touched on this briefly yesterday, there are some recent developments in the news coming out of Europe which merit a closer look. Germany has already stated that they have no intention of hitting their required goal of spending 2% of GDP on their military for at least the next decade. In the meantime, their military has fallen into such a state of disarray that they cant even certify enough pilots because there arent enough functional aircraft for them to log their required flight hours. (LA Times)
Its not just the helicopters and planes. As was previously disclosed, half of their tanks and all but one of their submarines are out of commission. Sadly, Angela Merkel has little motivation to act on these deficiencies with any sense of urgency. As the linked analysis points out, a strong military really isnt a priority for most of her citizens. In fact, many take their less militaristic stance as a point of pride. Following the horrors of the world wars, generations of Germans have grown up idealizing the concept of a world without war. Its a beautiful thought, but it ignores one very significant reality. Germany, along with most of the rest of western Europe, was largely able to sit out the cold war and not get dragged into any other conflicts to a significant degree precisely because America was doing all the heavy lifting. Perhaps criticizing the United States and talking about how you may have to back off from this relationship at the precise moment when most of your armys machinery is up on blocks with the tires having been stolen isnt the best timing imaginable. Heres a thought. Angela Merkel managed to hold her tongue when Donald Trump was calling for a military parade in Washington, but she had previously criticized Russia for planning a similar display. Perhaps thats because Germany couldnt put together enough military hardware these days to stage a parade more than a block long. |
Poster Comment:
And guess who is now going to lead NATO's rapid-response force? Germany! One can only hope they have a few jeeps still running so their generals can get around to issue orders to countries that have real military capabilities.
StarsAndStripes: As Germany prepares for NATO crisis-response role, its military readiness is abysmal
| . . .
Among the failures: none of Germanys submarines is operational, only four of its 128 Eurofighter jets are combat-ready and the army is short dozens of tanks and armored vehicles needed for NATO missions. In addition, troops are short on the basics: body armor, night vision gear and cold-weather clothing. . . . |
#1: paraclete To: Tooconservative (#0)
There is a simple answer to this, completely abdicate and give 2% of their GDP to the US to defend them, then the US will have more to spend on the military more justification for bases in Europe and a real ability to confront Putin on the ground. The day of the mercenary has returned
paraclete posted on 2018-05-22 04:51:44 Reply Private Reply
#2: A Pole To: paraclete (#1)
It would be 70 billion dollars, each year. Add other EU countries and it will be 340 billion.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-22 05:53:11 Reply Private Reply
#3: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#2)
Trump would probably take it but would want a chance to recruit EU soldiers, probably offering citizenship too.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-22 05:56:00 Reply Private Reply
#4: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#3)
More willing to take this offer would be men from poor Central American countries like Honduras and Guatemala than citizens of Norway or Luxemburg.
They would be also cheaper.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-22 06:22:46 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#4)
They're not sending us their best, just the rapists.
I heard that during the 2016 election.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-22 06:32:25 Reply Private Reply
#6: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#5)
The best Europeans get cushy jobs in Norway, Germany etc ...
To get cannon fodder you need to look for the more desperate.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-22 06:38:37 Reply Private Reply