Why Socrates Hated Democracy
| Source: | YouTube |
| Published: | Nov 28, 2016 |
| Author: | The School of Life |
| Post Date: | 2018-05-21 06:26:08 by A Pole |
| Views: | 2960 |
| Source: | YouTube |
| Published: | Nov 28, 2016 |
| Author: | The School of Life |
| Post Date: | 2018-05-21 06:26:08 by A Pole |
| Views: | 2960 |
#1: A Pole To: Pinguinite, sneakypete, Vicomte13, Tooconservative, Deckard (#0)
A Pole posted on 2018-05-21 06:27:06 Reply Private Reply
#2: Justified To: A Pole (#0)
The two points where America screwed the pooch is when we gave the people the right to vote for senators which was suppose to be for the state itself and woman the right to vote. I know omg how much a Cretan can you be! Woman are natural communist and family oriented which means they want freebies paid for by the government or we the hardworking people. Where the men knew they had to work to earn it to get it.
Justified posted on 2018-05-21 08:08:04 Reply Private Reply
#3: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#1)
Did Socrates and Machiavelli ever write anything as profound as "Grab 'em by the pussy"?
I didn't think so.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-21 08:16:52 Reply Private Reply
#4: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#3)
You indeed have a profound intellect. I am in awe!
A Pole posted on 2018-05-21 08:25:09 Reply Private Reply
#5: Stoner To: A Pole (#0)
I had a argument with a few guys at work one time about it. They kept talking about our democracy. Told them we were not a democracy, but a Republic. They scoffed. Told them over the weekend to do their research and prove me wrong. On Monday, they could not.
Stoner posted on 2018-05-21 11:27:16 Reply Private Reply
#6: A Pole To: Stoner (#5)
Rome was a Republic, that is why she was able to defeat enemies and become a great Empire with Emperor at the helm. After conversion to Christianity and transfer of the capital city from Milan to New Rome on Bosphorus lasted another thousand years.
Athens were a Democracy and lasted much shorter. Sparta was a Republic and lasted much longer.
Swiss Confederacy is very stable and is prevented from turning to conquests by its federal decentralized structure.
All such stuff and more is in Machiavelli.
http://www.online-literature.com/machiavelli/titus-livius/
A Pole posted on 2018-05-21 11:51:16 Reply Private Reply
#7: sneakypete To: A Pole (#1)
sneakypete posted on 2018-05-21 13:24:00 Reply Private Reply
#8: sneakypete To: Stoner (#5)
That's wrong. I am certain you mean to write "professional liars".
sneakypete posted on 2018-05-21 13:26:16 Reply Private Reply
#9: Stoner To: sneakypete (#8)
Stoner posted on 2018-05-21 13:56:52 Reply Private Reply
#10: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#6)
I notice you don't mention his history of Florence, widely regarded as far and away his best work by historians. The rest of his books were derivative and nothing special. And only the reputation for cynical wickedness that The Prince has had since the Victorian era really keeps his name alive at all.
I think it is just wrong to consider Machiavelli a major political thinker or writer. He wasn't famous, he was infamous.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-21 14:13:57 Reply Private Reply
#11: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#10)
You are grasping at straws, how silly.
On this site you can navigate:
Literature Network » Niccolo Machiavelli » Titus Livius
Click on » Niccolo Machiavelli » and you will see there History of Florence, (which I have read as well as all other works of Machiavelli available in Polish or English. Including his theater piece Mandrake (La Mandragola), which indeed is not on this site ;)
A Pole posted on 2018-05-21 14:27:12 Reply Private Reply