
After making its debut at the 2014 Geneva Motor Show (pictured) in March, the saltwater technology has now been certified for use on European roads. (source)
Nanoflowcell AG is the company behind the design, and they are currently preparing the technology for mass production.
Weve got major plans, and not just within the automobile industry. The potential of the NanoFlowcell is much greater, especially in terms of domestic energy supplies as well as in maritime, rail and aviation technology NanoFlowcell AG Chairman of the Board Professor Jens-Peter Ellermann.
This is huge news, and is another example out of so many that clearly show how we have so many ways to do better here. Although money remains an issue, it doesnt have to be.
All cars should be required to be made from this type, or other similar types of clean green energy. A few years ago, if you told somebody its possible to fuel a car by pouring saltwater into it, they would have called you a conspiracy theorist.
Last Year The U.S Navy Developed a Technology To Create Fuel From Seawater
Scientists at the U.S Naval Research Laboratory have developed a technology to recover carbon dioxide and hydrogen from seawater and convert it into a liquid hydrocarbon fuel. This could be a tremendous breakthrough and eliminate the need for old ways of generating fuel.
Its just another example of the many ways of generating energy that are now available that could end our dependence on fossil fuels. These new, clean green ways of generating energy have been around for decades, so why are we always talking about them without ever implementing them?
Refueling U.S. Navy Vessels, at sea, is a costly endeavor in terms of logistics, time, fiscal constraints and threats to national security sailors at sea. In Fiscal year 2011, the U.S. Navy Military Sea Lift Command, the primary supplier of fuel and oil to the U.S. Navy fleet, delivered nearly 600 million gallons of fuel to Navy vessels underway, operating 15 fleet replenishment oilers around the globe. (source)
The Navy successfully used the new fuel-from seawater process to power a radio-controlled scale-model replica of a World War II aircraft with an internal combustion engine. Below is the footage from the test flight.
In close collaboration with the Office of Navel Research p38 Naval Reserve program, NRL has developed a game changing technology for extracting, simultaneously, CO2 and H2 from seawater. This is the first time technology of this nature has been demonstrated with the potential for transition, from the laboratory, to full-scale commercial implementation. Dr. Heather Willauer (source)
Researchers say that this approach could be commercially viable within the next seven to ten years. They state interest in pursuing land-based options that could provide a solution to our current problems.
Again, another option, and example showing the power of human potential, so whats stopping us from the implementation of cleaner and greener technologies?
Not long ago, Department of Defence adviser Dr. Harold Puthoff made some noteworthy comments while discussing the reality of free energy. This is what he said:
Ive been taken out on aircraft carriers by the Navy and shown what it is we have to replace if we have new energy sources to provide new fuel methods.
You can watch that full interview HERE.
Whether it be Solar, Free Energy (zero-point), or converting seawater, its clear we can do better than we are doing now. Its remarkable how Barack Obama has constantly pointed out that we will be using oil, gas and coal for the next twenty years, and that we dont have the technology to lift our dependence off of these resources. Those who are looking into it can clearly see that this simply isnt true. We have the means to live in ways that are more harmonious with the planet and all beings on it.
#1: sneakypete To: Deckard (#0)
sneakypete posted on 2018-05-06 15:22:06 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hank Rearden To: Deckard (#0)
Did they drive it to the show, or was it towed there in the back of a truck?
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-05-06 16:14:52 Reply Private Reply
#3: no gnu taxes To: Deckard (#0)
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-05-06 17:07:34 Reply Private Reply
#4: paraclete To: Deckard (#0)
Reality check. This technology may be fine for naval uses but much of the world is far from the sea so the inferstructure to implement this will be a huge expense, not to mention that as hydro stations replace gas a massive fleet of rusting vehicles will need to be recycled. I expect the transport of sea water, a corrosive liquid will present its own difficulties
paraclete posted on 2018-05-06 17:43:44 Reply Private Reply
#5: A Pole To: paraclete (#4)
There is no need to bother with all those novelties. Let other countries waste money on them. The trusty XX century technology is sufficient.
As we all know the history came to the and as wise Fukuyama said.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-06 17:51:56 Reply Private Reply
#6: misterwhite To: Deckard (#0)
"Tank" is an appropriate word. One liter of water weighs one kilogram. 400 liters = 400 kilograms = 880 pounds. Of fuel. The car weighs over 5,000 pounds.
misterwhite posted on 2018-05-06 19:48:20 Reply Private Reply
#7: misterwhite To: Hank Rearden (#2)
misterwhite posted on 2018-05-06 19:49:30 Reply Private Reply
#8: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#6)
It's not the weight that disqualifies it as a serious proposal for mass transportation needs. It's the cost.
But if they reduce costs sharply, this could become a viable solution for some transport needs. Semis and delivery vehicles and buses, just to name a few.
As a personal car, this seems a complete failure other than as a rich man's toy ("Look what I bought that you can't afford!")
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-07 07:24:20 Reply Private Reply
#9: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#8)
Cars and airplanes also were "a rich man's toy".
Chinese and even Europeans will not wait until someone else does "reduce costs sharply"
A Pole posted on 2018-05-07 08:06:39 Reply Private Reply
#10: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#8)
misterwhite posted on 2018-05-07 08:16:01 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#9)
The revolution will not come until they do reduce costs sharply.
This isn't the first time such an insanely priced vehicle came along making these same kinds of promises.
Don't bet your nation's industrial car production on a single prototype. You'll notice that no big players are making that bet.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-07 09:10:05 Reply Private Reply
#12: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#10)
And just where do they expect to get such vast quantities of water from? Take Germany for example. Do they have enough lakes and reservoirs to collect so much water if they transformed all their vehicles for using such a system?
And keep in mind, 400 liters is 105 gallons of water to fill the tank. That's quite a lot when you multiply it by millions of vehicles. So in this latest WunderKar, you're getting under 4mpg of water.
What country has enough water and capacity to deal with transforming a First World fleet of vehicles fueled by rampant water-wasting? There's a developing crisis of fresh water supplies around the world already. China, Iran, California, places in the Midwest, all are drilling wells several miles deep due to declining aquifers and increased population.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-07 09:17:33 Reply Private Reply
#13: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#12)
Good point, especially that oil is more plentiful and cheaper than water in the oceans, lakes and rivers.
One should stay away from novelties. For example China is going crazy with super fast railroads. Railroads should be abolished as a costly waste of money. Highways built by FDR are much better and more frugal for the taxpayers.
Perhaps even better idea would be to return to the infrastructure before New Deal.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-07 09:43:32 Reply Private Reply
#14: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#12)
The amount of power is dependent upon the flow of ions from one water tank to the the the other through a very expensive "nano-membrane". This means salt water in one tank and distilled in the other. Distilled water is expensive and salt water is rare.
This Rube Goldberg machine makes hydrogen-powered cars look feasible. As my dad used to say, "Just because you can doesn't mean you should".
misterwhite posted on 2018-05-07 09:45:24 Reply Private Reply
#15: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#14)
Salt water is rare away from coasts other than a few inland seas. Assuming you could filter seawater enough to use in these Seawatermobiles.
Distilled water could be collected from the exhaust of the growing numbers of hydrogen vehicles powered by fuel cells. It is their only emission.
So you can picture how you pull your hydrogen vehicle into the service station to fill up on hydrogen and at the same time drain your 30 gallon reservoir of distilled water collected from your exhaust into a tank at the service station, all very clean. They then use that distilled water to help fuel up Joe Schmoe and his Seawatermobile at the next pump.
I dunno. It isn't all that convincing. More like a story from the old Omni magazines about gee-whiz gadgets that are going to revolutionize the world completely in a few years. Except they never do.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-07 10:04:13 Reply Private Reply
#16: Hank Rearden To: Deckard (#0)
That would make the inventors the richest people on Earth, yet we've never seen this happen, have we?
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-05-07 12:23:55 Reply Private Reply
#17: no gnu taxes To: Tooconservative (#15)
I remember that publication. They either had problems that were easily solved or could not possibly be solved. They always claimed they were difficult to solve. Didn't Larry Flynt own that magazine?
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-05-07 12:33:58 Reply Private Reply
#18: Tooconservative To: Hank Rearden (#16)
Much like the cold fusion tycoons, eh?
If they're so smart, why aren't they rich from their big invention (that they won't ever let anyone thoroughly inspect)?
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-07 21:09:39 Reply Private Reply
#19: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#18)
Several great inventors, artists and benefactors of mankind died poor.
You, see becoming rich is often a sign that you are a thief and a thug.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-08 02:03:13 Reply Private Reply
#20: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#19)
We can always rely on you to toe the Soviet propaganda line, comrade.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-08 07:25:32 Reply Private Reply
#21: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#20)
You worship Golden Calf so you will not understand.
The rich for you are holy and the poor are cursed.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-08 08:43:00 Reply Private Reply
#22: Tooconservative To: A Pole (#21)
Ah, the rhetoric of the Holy Soviet empire. No wonder Poland's history is so miserable if you are a representative sample.
I'm not at all fond of the rich. And I oppose the economic structures and policies that are designed to benefit the wealthy at the expense of everyone else and the constantly growing debt crisis, the actual source of their wealth disparity.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-05-08 09:20:49 Reply Private Reply
#23: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#22)
The reverse is true. Most of Poles (perhaps 60%) think like you and that is why "Poland's history is so miserable". Americans were lucky to be isolated by the oceans, and having unlimited resources.
If they were in the middle of Europe and had powerful neighbors, just the Civil War would be their doom, as foreign powers would take sides, enter and dismember USA.
Not that you are capable to imagine and understand that.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-08 09:44:42 Reply Private Reply
#24: Hank Rearden To: A Pole (#23)
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-05-08 12:44:24 Reply Private Reply
#25: A Pole To: Hank Rearden (#24)
Thanx, but I prefer Benedict and Francis over John Paul II
A Pole posted on 2018-05-08 15:57:42 Reply Private Reply
#26: tpaine To: Hank Rearden (#24)
The German polish sausage is better, same with Jewish jokes, and I got the hardly waits for an American (USA) Pope.
tpaine posted on 2018-05-08 20:06:08 Reply Private Reply
#27: Hank Rearden To: A Pole (#25)
Pope Quitter was OK, Pope Dope the First is just an economically-illiterate turdworld socialist asshole who needs to go.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-05-09 11:50:46 Reply Private Reply
#28: A Pole To: Hank Rearden (#27)
A Pole posted on 2018-05-09 11:57:25 Reply Private Reply
#29: Hank Rearden To: A Pole (#28)
Pope Dope the First is a useless commie turdworld asshole. Guess you'll never understand, but then you guys went along with communism for quite some time.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-05-09 19:50:59 Reply Private Reply
#30: A Pole To: Hank Rearden (#29)
I guess guys like you will see Commies under the bed for ever. You live in the past.
A Pole posted on 2018-05-10 04:33:39 Reply Private Reply