http://GeoengineeringWatch.org "Natures former balance is no more, the hand of man has forever altered what once was." ~ Dane Wigington
Poster Comment:

| Source: | FromThe Trenches/YouTube |
| Published: | Apr 27, 2018 |
| Author: | April Lee |
| Post Date: | 2018-04-27 10:37:47 by Deckard |
| Views: | 5492 |
http://GeoengineeringWatch.org "Natures former balance is no more, the hand of man has forever altered what once was." ~ Dane Wigington
Poster Comment:

#1: Jameson To: Deckard (#0)
Completely Insane............
These are called contrails and perfectly natural.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-jets-leave-a-white/
Jameson posted on 2018-04-27 11:32:19 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hank Rearden To: Deckard (#0)
Scientifically-ignorant, gullible, stupid people will be the end of civilization.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-27 12:22:54 Reply Private Reply
#3: misterwhite To: Hank Rearden (#2)
There is no scientific data that supports global warming. None. All of the temperature data collected is then "adjusted" for various made-up factors ... which results in (surprise!) an increase in temperature.
Second, who's to say that the Earth isn't returning to the temperature it should be?
Third, doesn't solar activity have any effect? Remember back in the 70's when we were supposedly entering an ice age? And whatever happened to "acid rain" which was going to destroy the planet?
Lastly, water vapor accounts for about 97 percent of the total (natural plus man-emitted) greenhouse warming of the planet." The current concentration of carbon dioxide is about 0.04%. In pre-industrial times it was 0.03%.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-27 14:02:55 Reply Private Reply
#4: calcon To: Deckard (#0)
calcon posted on 2018-04-27 14:34:51 Reply Private Reply
#5: Jameson To: misterwhite (#3)
Should I believe you.....some character pounding on a keyboard and professing advanced knowledge on a right-wing argument clinic??
Or actual scientists (lots of them) producing empirical evidence....???
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
I think I'll believe NASA.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-27 14:38:25 Reply Private Reply
#6: misterwhite To: Jameson (#5)
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments- account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/
I believe the raw temperature data collected by NASA, NOAA and the UKs Met Office. I don't believe the adjustments they make to that raw data.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-27 15:15:02 Reply Private Reply
#7: Jameson To: misterwhite (#6)
Are you a scientist?
I'm not either......
I'll still take their word for it.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-27 15:50:34 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: Jameson (#7)
Nope. And I wasn't back in the 70's when "scientists" told me a global ice age was approaching, that acid rain would destroy the planet, the ozone hole will give us all cancer, killer bees were coming to America to wipe us out, AIDS will kill everyone, there will be mass starvation due to overpopulation, bacon causes cancer, and GMO food is dangerous.
You take their word on all that, too?
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-27 16:07:21 Reply Private Reply
#9: Jameson To: misterwhite (#8)
No, I'm placing my trust in the hundreds of scientists and organizations that are backing this finding.
This issue has nothing to do with the junk science you've mentioned.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-27 16:12:46 Reply Private Reply
#10: GrandIsland To: Jameson (#7)
And if the scientist sold you a bridge... youd be whipping out your libtarded wallet.
Haaaa
GrandIsland posted on 2018-04-27 17:05:13 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: Hank Rearden (#2)
Let's hope so.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-27 19:48:33 Reply Private Reply
#12: jeremiad To: Deckard (#0)
jeremiad posted on 2018-04-27 21:48:11 Reply Private Reply
#13: paraclete To: Deckard (#0)
paraclete posted on 2018-04-27 23:13:14 Reply Private Reply
#14: misterwhite To: Jameson (#9)
They are all working with the same corrupted data. Which is why Trump recently demanded they produce their raw data ... before it was "adjusted".
"A proposed policy would bar the E.P.A. from considering research that doesn't release its raw data for review".
-- New York Times
You're in favor of that, right? No more "secret science"? No more, "trust me"?
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 10:38:01 Reply Private Reply
#15: misterwhite To: Jameson (#1)
No, no. no. They're now called "chemtrails".
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 10:43:45 Reply Private Reply
#16: Jameson To: misterwhite (#14)
Just because DD45 is tweeting doesn't make the "corrupted data" argument any more valid.
A proposed policy
Lots of agendas are proposed as policy.....
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 11:07:50 Reply Private Reply
#17: Jameson To: misterwhite (#15)
Listening to re-broadcasts of "Coast-to-Coast AM" again?
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 11:10:06 Reply Private Reply
#18: misterwhite To: Jameson (#16)
We'll see how quickly that raw data is turned over. If ever.
This whole "the Earth is getting hotter and man is the cause" bullshit is about to come to a crashing end.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 11:18:33 Reply Private Reply
#19: Deckard To: jeremiad (#12)
Pretty sure the posters who have weighed in on this thread are not old enough to remember the 70's or 80's.
And yes, contrails DO dissipate quickly - something that the "experts" here fail to grasp.
Deckard posted on 2018-04-28 11:25:13 Reply Private Reply
#20: Jameson To: misterwhite (#18)
Sure.......
Then what?
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 11:33:09 Reply Private Reply
#21: misterwhite To: Jameson (#20)
Hopeully, public lynchings for everyone involved in this "global warming" scam.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 11:39:48 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hank Rearden To: Jameson (#5)
Odumbass told NASA their highest priority will be to promote the fucking Mooslum deathcult.
And NASA went along with that jugeared jackass's bullshit.
And you believe NASA. You're as dumb as a democRat. They're corrupted just like the Injustice Dept.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-28 11:48:14 Reply Private Reply
#23: Hank Rearden To: Jameson (#20)
Then we bring the 'Rat party to a crashing end, if it doesn't happen this summer as the corrupt Odumbass regime's domestic-spying scandal metastasizes.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-28 11:49:24 Reply Private Reply
#24: Jameson To: misterwhite (#21)
Why?
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 11:56:49 Reply Private Reply
#25: Jameson To: Hank Rearden (#22)
Right.....
It's all a corrupt conspiracy..........
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 11:59:13 Reply Private Reply
#26: Jameson To: Hank Rearden (#23)
You are a loon.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 12:00:02 Reply Private Reply
#27: misterwhite To: Jameson (#24)
For all the damage caused to the fossil fuel industries, the people who lost their jobs, the cost of regulations, and the billions spent on junk science.
Maybe not lynching. That's too quick. Perhaps burning at the stake ... using old oil and coal.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 12:20:30 Reply Private Reply
#28: Jameson To: misterwhite (#27)
I think if you check Google Finance, you'll find the gas/oil industry is doing quite well.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 12:23:20 Reply Private Reply
#29: misterwhite To: Jameson (#28)
Recently. Better than coal, I bet.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 12:39:08 Reply Private Reply
#30: Jameson To: misterwhite (#29)
Yes of course.
Natural gas has been replacing coal at a torrid pace for more than a decade.
Technology, like fracking and horizontal drilling have caused the natural gas industry to compete quite well against coal....
Domestic competition has killed the coal industry.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-28 13:01:38 Reply Private Reply
#31: misterwhite To: Jameson (#30)
No. Regulations did that. There is still a huge coal export economy, if we have people mining.
misterwhite posted on 2018-04-28 13:06:34 Reply Private Reply
#32: Hank Rearden To: Jameson (#25)
Patience, grasshopper. Watch and see.
Unlike democRats, I observe and don't make crap up.
Obviously, you're not following the corrupt Odumbass regime's domestic spying scandal unfold as it's dragged into the sunlight.
For instance, do you understand the implications of the latest FBI-lovebirds texts released this last week? I'll wait for your analysis.
So you're in for quite the surprise and like all 'Rats, won't understand why you lost this November, either. Mark my words.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-28 13:27:51 Reply Private Reply
#33: Deckard To: Hank Rearden, Jameson (#32)
Yet the so-called "scandal" continues under Trump - we now have a Republican president, and domestic spying on American citizens by the NSA has continued and even increased.
You really think either of those two puppets gives a shit about the 4th amendment rights of Americans? Of course not.
Deckard posted on 2018-04-28 15:23:04 Reply Private Reply
#34: Jameson To: Hank Rearden (#32)
Implications?
Doesn't affect me at all. I don't care.
"...understand why you lost this November,..."
Poor grammar............
Lose what?
Jameson posted on 2018-04-30 07:41:07 Reply Private Reply
#35: Jameson To: Deckard, Hank Rearend (#33)
The POTUS can do nothing about "collecting intelligence" aka spying.
The 4th amendment can only protect us in a court of law, even then, not always. - Thanks for the "patriot act" republicans!!
It has been going on for decades, and will continue. There is nothing that any of us can do about it.
Fact of life. Stomp your feet, shake your fist at the TV, get all liquored up and go off on a rant....it doesn't matter, and you don't matter.
Get on with your life.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-30 07:53:27 Reply Private Reply
#36: Jameson To: misterwhite (#31)
Sorry, it was technology that made the harvesting of natural gas cheaper....
That's competition....
Jameson posted on 2018-04-30 07:58:44 Reply Private Reply
#37: Deckard To: Jameson, Hank Rearden (#35)
Deckard posted on 2018-04-30 08:36:12 Reply Private Reply
#38: Hank Rearden To: Jameson (#34)
You don't care that the State Dept under Odumbass was getting campaign disinformation from the Clinton Crime Family and incorporating it into the intel operations?
Did you know, or perhaps you don't give a shit, that the State Dept is specifically barred from intelligence gathering, in order to foster trust with other nations?
Congratulations, you've earned my first and only Block. You're just too damn leftist and ignorant to waste any more time on. We'll just outvote and beat you, leaving you to wallow in your arrogant ignorance.
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-30 11:46:23 Reply Private Reply
#39: Jameson To: Hank Rearden (#38)
Fake News
you've earned my first and only Block
I don't care.
Jameson posted on 2018-04-30 11:55:19 Reply Private Reply