They didn't get their way, and because of that they have thrown a tantrum and broken the furniture, and they were allowed to do it. But NOW they need to not get their way again, and be punished in a way that is so painful that they are afraid to have another tantrum.

Trump's and our enemies have crossed the line, and they need to be forcibly pushed back across the line, and made to understand that they will be compelled, by force, to obey the rules. They do not get to do what they are doing. It is not our way. They have been allowed to get away with it for too long. They are trying to hijack the prosecutorial powers of government to destroy a President and his officers.

Therefore, the prosecutorial powers of government need to be seized by the President and his officers and turned on the enemies. What they want to do to him needs to be done in retaliation to them, and carried through to the bitter end.

The Clintons and the Democrat cabal driving this narrative need to be crushed beneath the wheel of prosecution and police power. They're TRYING to do it to us. But we outnumber them, are stronger, and we are not the criminals. They are. They're like the Japanese. They've launched Pearl Harbor. This needs to end with the nuclear weapons of both Clintons, Obama, and several former cabinet officials and judges being frog marched in handcuffs before the cameras and spending the rest of their lives in prison.

To quote an apt popular story: "When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die."

But we outnumber them...

But we don't. We do (barely) outnumber Dems in a handful of crucial states for the electoral college.

Otherwise, Felonia von Pantsuit would be prez right now.

...are stronger, ...

In gun ownership and little else.

and we are not the criminals.

These are not considered crimes unless a Republican commits them.

But we don't. We do (barely) outnumber Dems in a handful of crucial states for the electoral college.

"We" doesn't mean "Republicans".

It means Americans who aren't Democrats. They're a third of the population. We're two-thirds. Also, there are SOME Democrats who didn't like it when Republicans did this same thing to Clinton - because they thought it was wrong - and now they don't like seeing Republicans do it Trump.

I'm an Independent who sees it precisely like that. I thought that the witch hunt against Clinton was an attack on the Republic and hated it, and I hate the revenge move by the Democrats now.

But maybe you're right.

Felonia von Pantsuit

LOL!!

That's funny!! Did you come up with that?

I'm gonna start using it right now!! - I'll credit you....

Good one!

I understand his anger and frustration. I feel it too.

I sure do get it. I just saw it as brutally harsh language for a President to be using on a morning TV show. But maybe that's why he was elected. People see sincereness coming from him.

Vicomte13 But we outnumber them...

But we don't. We do (barely) outnumber Dems in a handful of crucial states for the electoral college. --- TC

TC's claim above is a perfect example of tribalism from a self described conservative --- in reality a closet trump hater..

Your reply is right on:---

We" doesn't mean "Republicans".

It means Americans who aren't Democrats. They're a third of the population. We're two-thirds.

That's funny!! Did you come up with that?

I'm not that original. It's been a popular phrase on Righty blogs like HotAir or AoS or Townhall where I read.

The more formal version of the nickname is Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit.

I'm not that original.

yeah, alright then...

Really funny!

I'll be forced to only use it in private convos... since I cannot cite it...

Thanks

I'll be forced to only use it in private convos... since I cannot cite it...

Thanks

Why not? This isn't an academic institution. You can plagiarize all you like and nobody can do anything about it, unless you cut and paste lines out of the Wall Street Journal.

It means Americans who aren't Democrats. They're a third of the population. We're two-thirds.

I'll take some issue with the math you're using...

I, myself am NOT a Democrat, I am NOT a republican, AND I most certainly AM NOT a member of your "we're 2-turds" tribe.

Of the 100 or so people who would come to mind in my circle of friends...probably 70 would definitely identify as not supporting either party and would certainly not be supporting any immediate future candidates who would defend or affirm President golden shower........even though some did vote for him...

Why not? This isn't an academic institution.

Yeah, I know - but - it's kind of like stealing jokes... - most comedians have done it, but it's still a bad idea...

Even if it's funny!

brutally harsh language for a President to be using on a

Good for Trump. Toughen up the masses of pussified sheep.

Yeah, I know - but - it's kind of like stealing jokes... - most comedians have done it, but it's still a bad idea...

Even if it's funny!

If it weren't for plagiarism there would be very little humor in this world, just as if it weren't for lies, there would be very little sex.

If it weren't for plagiarism there would be very little humor in this world, just as if it weren't for lies, there would be very little sex.

An extremely attractive woman once told me that she wouldn't have sex with any man who didn't have 9 inches. I had to send her away telling her, "I won't be cutting off 3 inches for any bitch."

The more formal version of the nickname is Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit.

Mine is "Hillary Milhous Felon" and I may have invented it; no way to be sure.